4
types-strictyaml 1.7.3.0 (pypi.org)
submitted 5 months ago by to c/python@programming.dev
NSFW 7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This has been missing for about a decade.

strictyaml validates yaml files against a schema. Potentially dangerous user input within yaml files can be safely parsed, validated, and used.

types-strictyaml is a static typing stubs only package. Which is a weird kinda package. Especially when testing it.

Recommend Python apps/packages that have user facing config files to use strictyaml. Now there is one less reason not to.

If you are curious about the semantic version str.

1.7.3.0 --> For strictyaml-1.7.3 stubs package release version 0.

danger ahead

Open to PRs expand testsuite coverage. This is not your normal testsuite; might be in danger of learning something new.

all 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 10 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I mean YAML is pretty gnarly but is it really NSFW?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Haven't seen other posts from Programming.dev users, but since apparently the instance was suffering from people abusing the account creation system to cause problems, maybe it's an instance-wide behavior while they're handling the issue?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    This community users don't post much cause we are lazy and shy. And posters are faced by us holding up a mirror. Most flee. Their own reflections being either too pathetic or hideous for them to defend.

    This discourages posters that lack thick skins or who are unprepared for fight club.

    Everyone is welcome to hold my feet to the fire. Don't pull your punches. Review the source code, discuss, post issues, and create PRs. Building out the testsuite is a rich target. Like shooting fish in a barrel. Only those who don't shoot, miss.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 1 point 5 months ago

    Coders are easily lead astray. That checkbox called out to me with it's seductive clickability and deceptively plain design. What it lacks in esthetics it makes up for in mystery. What does NSFW mean? Thought it meant no sex for whitey.

    And for the Captain Obvious amongst us, my point is the UI lacks clarity leaving room for interpretation. Without that clarity, i'm as right as you are.

    Very much doubt anyone will get laid with the release of a stubs package. So the tag is appropriate.

    What matters is the excuse is somewhat plausible.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I guess technically any bug or security flaw is not safe for work

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 5 months ago

    Unless related to AI there is no funding. A lowly stubs package is in fact not safe for work and definitely not safe on a resume, can't discuss it with your wife, friends, or in public. Even the testsuite is a freak of nature.

    Can anyone even open the github repo without contracting a social stigma?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent