Dorsey admitted that his new messaging app had not been reviewed or tested for security issues prior to its launch.

all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 20 points 1 year ago

Of course it hasn't. He can just publish it and all his ball licker fans will just gobble it up.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    dorsey really didn't have a single original idea in years. first that guy pushed mastodon-but-worse, now hes trying to push briar-but-a-lot-worse

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    What was his Mastodon clone? I feel like his name sounds familiar, but I'm blanking on the app/website name now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Looking at the code, it reads like it was written by LLM: chatty commit messages, lack of spelling/capitalization errors, bullet points galore, shit-ton of "Fix X" commits that don't read like they're increasingly-frustrated, worthless comments randomly scattered like "i + 1 // add 1 to i" without any other comments on the page.

    No security review because none of the code has been reviewed and he doesn't know what's in it.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    No one likes writing tests! Give him a break!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 2 comments in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    So Dorsey "invents" a Briar clone that's untested, and calls it Bitch At?

    Another win. Shave that stupid beard

  • source