I wonder if this is why the released report is missing several sections.

It’s obvious, more than anything, that Ken Martin hired his buddy to do this thing, and he was extremely unqualified for the job. Israel and Gaza aren’t the only things that are missing. Most of the report, itself, is missing.

Clearly, the reason Ken Martin didn’t wanna release this report is because it is, for the most part, unfinished. It’s an embarrassment.

Why is it necessary for the DNC specifically to commission such a study, why can't an independant poltical-science oriented commission produce a report in the interests of estsblishing at arms length what shit needs to change regardless of whether democrats endorse or approve or release it at all?

Imagine that.

Even if the author didn’t think this was the reason, you’d think they’d even bring it up once to debunk it.

Does anyone really need the DNC "autopsy report" anyway? They push candidates who'll take money from any pac and don't really give a shit about doing what's good for the majority. They don't take "risks" like standing up for anything. Their just like a huge, shitty HR department who try to do enough to keep their jobs as long as they can

I wouldn't have expected it to. There are both cynical and earnest interpretations of that. Cynically, they are avoiding pissing off AIPAC. Earnestly, the American electorate as a whole isn't moved by the plight of Palestinians.

I'll leave everyone to their own choice of interpretations, but you don't have to morally agree with the latter to feel it is true. Both could be true.