$1 million to save all those lives is way too much. That's almost 0.00025% of an Elon Musk
America, as a country, would sooner sacrifice a million children than tax a billionaire to support safety nets like flood warning systems
$1 million to save all those lives is way too much. That's almost 0.00025% of an Elon Musk
America, as a country, would sooner sacrifice a million children than tax a billionaire to support safety nets like flood warning systems
They spent it on a giant wall they were trying to build at the border to save them from dangerous people looking for jobs.
You know how Republicans hate "woke"?
It makes sense. If you wake up and just look at results, you see what their priorities get you.
The US anytime their citizens need something: Ugh, bit WHO is going to pay for it!?
The US when any CEO twists his financial dick: Have you ever seen what a billion dollars in a suit case looms like?
It's as if Texas officials deserve to drown to death. Oh well, that's rightwingers for you
As sad as this story is, I’m struggling to figure out why this is something that I should know
People should know and have evidence on hand that policy and budget decisions directly effect lives.
This is another lesson available, we are individuals that are part of communities which can learn from this lesson vicariously.
This community had a conversation that ended with a vote, where people chose not to pay more taxes and to not figure out the minutia of how to run the system effectively - nor did they receive a grant from above levels of government - nor did they determine a local low cost solution - and because of that people were swept away in a flash flood they had no clue was coming like countless times in history and prehistory.
There will always be a balance between safety and budget, just as with all other qualities, and its a constant difficulty always filled with consequences wherever the decisions made land.
But some consequences are easier to bare than others.
The next time this community thinks about floods and what to do about them they're perspective will likely shift with the weight of the dead bodies left in the debris field, and it should be hoped that other communities who know this news understand that too.
The effort and cost of government is for our collective benefit, because the world is rough, and by working and sacrificing together we can make it easier if we choose to.
This article adds to the story and make you think about the decisions you and your community are making.
This lemmy according to the description is for "all the things that make your life easier". As sad as it may be I really don't gain anything from learning a random place on the other side of the world made bad policy decisions.
You learn to make better policy decisions in your community. You learn that one in a thousand occurrences do actually happen and are worth planning for on a community scale.
It’s my own country, and I would be happier if I could un-know this.
Yeah, I'm not even in that country, I'm not sure how it's relevant to us all.
Many countries have corrupt governments sadly, it sucks, and I wish them the best in however they fight their internal societal enemies.
Every example of repugnican mismanagement SHOULD be posted everywhere for all to see
The NYT wants you to think this instead of how eliminating our safety nets is already devastating and going to make this worse. Basically, they want you to blame the local government, not the federal government. So the YSK should be replaced with "We want you to think" or WWYTT
Weren't the warning systems gutted?
But in a recent interview, Rob Kelly, the Kerr County judge and its most senior elected official, said that local residents had been resistant to new spending. “Taxpayers won’t pay for it,” he said, adding that he didn’t know if people might reconsider now.
Did he take a poll? When politicians claim the taxpayers will or won't do something, it's likely a farse.
This was brought up after a flood originally, wouldn't they have reconsidered then?
no comments (yet)