5
What are some provocative but legit characterizations of a substance you learned and that makes sense? (lemmy.world)
submitted 6 months ago by to c/drugs@lemmy.world
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cocaine

bipolar in a powder

all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Mmmh not substance specific, but

"slow drugs are for fast people and fast drugs are for slow people"

(works better in Finnish, but replace slow with downers and fast with uppers and it's the same)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    A friend once told me, "I will never try cocaine, because I already like it, I just don't know I do."

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago*

    I've tried cocaine several times. Didn't really affect me. Not to the extent I'd pay money for it at least, but I can see why one would if one wasn't me.

    Which sounds arrogant as fuck. Which probably explains why I don't need the coke.

    And yeah while the first time I tried it was mostly flour, one time I was in Amsterdam and we got that shit from an international dealer whos car's secret stashes I got to see. So 'twas good blow.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    LSD is being behind the steering wheel of a trippy car. Mushrooms is being strapped into a trippy rollercoaster.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    I understand the sentiment but don't necessarily characterise it the same way.

    The way I thought of those is that LSD is like playing with a mischievous 500-year old demigod, whereas mushrooms are like an ageless cosmic entity with no limits or form

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent