submitted 6 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
๐Ÿคช 1

all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] 46 points 6 months ago

Here are a range of estimates of AI data center water use for California, based mostly on simple fundamental physics of converting energy use to water use for cooling. I did these calculations and then, perhaps appropriately, checked and explored these estimates using four AI models

He guessed, then asked the sycophant machine to tell him he is a smart and clever boy.

To illustrate his point he used a nightmare-inducing AI generated image with talking headless birds and water flowing uphill into both ends of a tube.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 16 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Did OP expect this not to downvoted here?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] [S] -14 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    This is not Reddit. Downvotes does not matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    True, but downvoted posts get even less views.

    I'm down voting because even a common HVAC tech could discredit this author into obscurity. This entire article is laced with assumptions probably as a result of improper AI use.

    Edit: As a datacenter solutions architect I also can tell you this article is garbage as everything comes down to BTUs. The higher the electrical use, the higher the heat output resulting in the equivalent tons of cooling needed to negate it. Go look up 'BTU calculator' if you think I'm full of shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -11 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Exactly. How dare someone post anything that threatens Fedi's visceral, quasi-religious hatred of ... neural networks

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 2 points 6 months ago*

    NN suck. Unless you're a God programmer then following a non-trvial NN along to it's output is bonkers. It might as well be spagetti code, written in Latin, in a black box.

    Can't imagine why don't people love having (their) works used to produce slop competition - how superstitous and irrational! /s

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 19 points 6 months ago

    Yes, it uses less than the public thinks, but it still uses too much. 1 ounce is too much. AI can fuck right off. It is not entitled to our world.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 9 points 6 months ago

    Slurp gobble.

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [โ€“] 8 points 6 months ago

    In other news, shit tastes less bad than the public thinks.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 7 points 6 months ago

    I just glanced over out of curiosity.

    That fucking AI Slop image used for visualization itself is almost too much to bear...

    And - maybe I just got something wrong, please correct me otherwise - what's up with the units used in the handmade and AI-verified calculations?

    • what's 70mm (millimetres) of water? Did they mean mm^3^?
    • one bullet point estimated the evaporation per square meter, the next one is about per cubic meter of floor space (?)
    • overall, I'd guess you'd have to calculate the evaporation for the total air volume and not the plain floor space... Which is, well a fucking lot more
  • source