You’ll need to verify your age by June or lose access to PlayStation social features.
don't threaten me with a good time.
You’ll need to verify your age by June or lose access to PlayStation social features.
don't threaten me with a good time.
Bitch, how you gonna ask me for age verification when the account itself is 18+ years old??
Need a law that says that if a company enables age verification, and leak someone's PII, then that company has to pay for all of each affected individual's hardships for the rest of their life due to the company leak.
Maybe even backwards compatibility as well. If a company requires age verification, then they must fund individuals to obtain individual identification since it's not free for people or tax payers.
Best I can do is six months of free credit monitoring.
And a free download code for little big planet
You really mean BEST you can do, since the majority of companies not only do they not pay a single cent, but they don't even pay you.
And a penalty and mandatory oversight to ensure they fix the problem.
If they were to verify your age using the credit card you probably already have on file to pay for the social features they’re age-gating, then that would be one thing. But of course they use a third party biometrics company with a proven history of leaking biometric data and require a government ID or a face scan, neither of which they’ll be getting from me lol.
Pretty bad look for a company with a horrendous reputation for data leaks.
climate change, school shootings, fascists, pandemics, AI, gambling... what's one more thing?
You're forgetting the systemic pedophilia
that has always been a thing, i was just listing the new fun stuff.
🎶
Climate change
Poland Spring
Polymarket gambling
Fascists
Smart Bombs
Insider trading
October 7th
trade wars
inflation
Systematic pedophilia
...
So wait, this means I can never subscribe to PlayStation Plus again?
Okay.
I'm with you. I used to love being in on the bleeding edge of technology. Now it just disappoints me. Enshittifcation is the norm. Instead of "how can we make this game more fun," it's all about "how can we wring more profit out of this," and gathering personal data for marketing is a favorite method. I never thought I'd become a Luddite, but here I am.
I don't want to come off as some sort of luddite, but tech is starting to become dreadful rather than exciting. It's less "what cool things can we do" and more "how can govs and corpos surveil, control, and extract more money from everyone."
It's difficult to pin an exact time, but (aside from medical advances) I would say that technology peaked about 10 years ago in terms of advancements still representing a benefit to the average person. "Advancements" since then have been getting increasingly detrimental.
Need a room mate? I've wanted to do this for years now lol. I mean, except the suicide part.
I'm doing the same and streaming my experience. I bought a Retrofreak and playing a bunch of obscure Japanese famicom, superfamicom, sega mark iii, master system, mega drive, game gear, game boy, gba, and finally pc-engine games. I live right next to a used game store too. It's so great. I haven't bought a new PC game for myself in about a year (I buy switch games for my kids).
Oh! I also hacked my 3ds lately so I'm playing a bunch of games on that too.
I really should dig out my old 3DS XL. I left lots of unfinished games on that flash cart.
This is also me. Come step into the future with me by coming to the past where everything is better!
I'm seriously gonna buy a good set of solar panels, build a log cabin in the woods and just live there.
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
I never bought the network adapter for my PS2, so they won't be adding any age verification to it.
My account itself is 18 years old. If your account itself is of legal age can you skip age verification?
Wouldn't it be easier to implement it like Steam did where account age and payment options were considered? They're basically asking for 2011 to just happen again willingly.
UK specifically right now, will probably spread soon to other places.
While Sony won’t be requiring age verification for UK and Ireland PlayStation accounts until June, you can verify early and avoid losing access to features. Both Microsoft and Sony are making age verification mandatory in the UK as more parts of the Online Safety Act come into force this year.
Because realistically nobody is against it. People can whine all the want, they will verify anyway rather than miss out on online gaming, social media, porn etc. You personally might be the outlier and maybe you even convinced your family and friends, but sadly unless at the bare minimum 50% of users outright leave the platform enforcing age verification they couldn't care less about our feelings.
I think it’s more fair to say people will still comply, rather than saying nobody is against it.
It’s amazing how far most people will bend before breaking.
True. Unless you walk away from the platform, in earnest, age verification moves forward.
Yes. Most would rather kneel.
I’d rather use an old console and play offline. Don’t feed the system by buying more digital.
I'll be going offline when my OS asks for my ID. I've been online since 98 or so. I don't want to leave, even tho the net is a super shitty place now, but there is just no choice at this time. In the mean time I am building an off line library of stuff
While I don't entirely disagree, I also think the amount may be a bit more than you think. Just to go off of the backlash Discord faced forcing them to wait a few months in hopes nobody will care later. If absolutely nobody was against it for them, they wouldn't have bothered with even that much. Then again, that's PC vs Console, so I'm not sure if the demographics would be drastically different.
If you'll allow me a moment to gather my thoughts

Don't you need a credit card to buy the onlines? I am aware of gift cards that may be purchased with cash. But like, that takes work. You have to get up. It is far easier to age a few years and get a credit card. Therefore,

They're doing this because of OSA. I'm starting to wonder if the end game here is like the one for tobacco, where it will be illegal for anyone born before 2008 to use the Internet.
Not sure which is worse, Sony adding age-gating to PlayStation or The Verge adding pay-gating to the article about it.
wtf why? so, if are too old you can't play?
I already don't use the social features of my PS5. I don't even play online games with it since I ain't paying extra for that bullshit; I get all my MP games on PC unless they are couch multiplayer games.
I'll gladly accept a PlayStation without social features. I just want to play games. I am 100 years old. I own a mansion and a yacht.
I know this isn't the point, but ffs The Verge. "Add age verification to it is consoles"? Seriously?
that appears to be OP's headline, not from The Verge.
Oh, well then "seriously, OP?" Though in this case the grammar issues are not as bad, because I expect professional media organisations to hold themselves to higher standards than randoms on the Internet.
Though it adds a layer because I hate when people editorialise headlines without it being clear that that's what was done. It's misleading and in this case was totally unnecessary, since the un-editorialised headline got the message across just fine.
top 63 comments