top 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 8 points 6 months ago*

I dunno all life today is an example of an unbroken lineage back to the begining of all life in existence (on earth), yes most branches wither and die but there's also no such thing as a 'new' species, just the latest permutation or branch of one that was there before.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Funny that this is some profound statement

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    He's not wrong. I'd be surprised if we had any more than 2,000 years left, the way things are going. And most of that is time taken for the small groups scattered across the planet after the bigger catastrophies to die off.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Yea... Probably some felonious fraudster convincing people they can be exalted to godhood... Own their own planet... Impregnate all their wives. Populate the planet with their spiritual children.

    Yea... Sounds legit. 💯

  • source
  • [+] 5 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Do you know anything about black holes or dwarf stars? Like roughly how long they last? Also you seem to think heat death is for sure and it's not. Not at all. It's the current most popular theory but crunch and rip are still fully possible.

    Silly scifi goth

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    Based on what we know right now, I agree. There is more about physics that we don't understand than what we do, and who knows what might be harnessed!

    Humans won't be doing any of the harnessing, of course. That species is fucked.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Was posting on im14andthisisdeep?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Michel Mayor, Nobel laureate in physics, discusses important questions such as "dude, wouldn't it be cool if we could send people to live on other planets on the far side of the galaxy?" and "if there are aliens, what do you think they're like?"

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Very valid points. I’m guessing humanity will disappear much sooner: we are our own worst enemy. At the rate we are going it may well be over in a couple of hundred years.

  • source
  • [–] -5 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    Noble laureates, the most abundant source of opinions found so far.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I'll take his over most other louder ones like Elon Musk.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    We get it. You're a contrarian.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    No, just this thought belongs in Shower Thoughts.

    This "Nobel Laureate" needs to check his hubris and condescension.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    I find it always funny how people defend every platitude that comes from a decorated scientist because he got amplified through "pop sci" media.

    This is exactly how we got people like Feynman, Montagnier or Pauling.

    I don't think this is scientific or ethical in the end.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago*

    I love J R Gott's application of the Copernican Principle to the observation of the human race (and anything else). The chances are that you are an average observer of the human race (or anything else) and exist in the 95% range, which gives us between a few thousand and a million years left.
    We are almost definitely not going to last. But we will almost definitely last longer than reality TV.

  • source