The middle distribution of Gen Z’s feelings about AI range from apprehension to downright hatred. Despite the fact that more than half of Gen Z living in the U.S. uses AI regularly, according to a recently released Gallup poll, less than a fifth feel hopeful about the technology. About a third says the technology makes them angry. And nearly half say it makes them afraid.

Gallup’s own senior education researcher, Zach Hrynowski, blamed the bad vibes at least partially on the dwindling job market. The oldest Zoomers, he told Axios, are the angriest, as they are “acutely aware” of the ability of a technology to transform cultural norms without a second thought, unlike a Gen Xer who is trained to see new technology as toys and are still “playing around with AI.”

Indeed, job prospects for the recently graduated Gen Z are abysmal; Bloomberg just reported that 43% of young graduates are “underemployed,” meaning taking on jobs that require less education than they have.

[...]

This is not just a Gen Z problem, either. In the American heartland, data centers are being proposed at a pace that local communities never anticipated and for which they were never asked permission, and they’re increasingly pushing back.

The numbers are serious. According to a report from 10a Labs’ Data Center Watch, at least $18 billion worth of data center projects have been blocked and another $46 billion delayed over the past two years owing to local opposition. At least 142 activist groups across 24 states are now actively organizing to block data center construction and expansion. A Heatmap Pro review of public records found that 25 data center projects were canceled following local pushback in 2025 alone, four times as many as in 2024, with 21 of those cancellations occurring in the second half of the year as electricity costs grew.

The concerns driving this resistance are less about existential AI risk and more about typical kitchen-table complaints; communities consistently cite higher utility bills, water consumption, noise, impacts on property values, and green space destruction as their primary objections. Water use is mentioned as a top concern in more than 40% of contested projects, according to a Heatmap Pro review of public records.

top 91 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 64 points 6 months ago* (21 children)

You get "attempted murder" in America for setting a wall on fire and smashing glass?

In France, thats a Tuesday.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    Our prosecutors like to throw a bunch of heinous charges and see what sticks. Its how they get people to agree with plea bargains.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    That's really fucked up. It almost guarantees that there's gonna be a percentage of people who are totally innocent but take prison time in a deal because they are threatened by too much more. In my country the system is the opposite - too lenient, which isn't necessarily bad if accompanied by work to rehabilitate and reduce recidivism, but there's very little of that either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (3 children)

    i posted this comment on the wrong comment, meant to reply to you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    Your comment is geo-locked - I can't read it because I'm in the UK and Finland has made the frankly sensible decision to block UK users because of our somewhat misnamed 'online safety bill'! TIL. Interesting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    oh i was just mentioning the west Memphis Three and Central Park Five as very infamous cases of cops coercing false confessions of brutal crimes out of literal kids, then giving them life/death sentence depending on the individuals in the cases. one kid took an albert plea in order retain his innocence in writing but was still inprisoned and seen as guilty in the eyes of everyone. harrowing shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Thanks! Yeah, it's horrible. Plus some parts of the US still use the death penalty. I'm not immovably against the death penalty - some people are just that irredeemable - but it definitely shouldn't be an option in any legal system that can't be 100% sure about guilt. At present, none of them can be that sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    In the US you get charged with a bunch of bullshit as an intimidation tactic (or often for propaganda reasons). In court it gets haggled down to the actual charges. No penalty for prosecutors doing this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    The assailant used chemical weapons in attempt to escape ICE.

    Dude: I forgot to take my lactase and ate too much dairy for lunch and farted in his face while they were illegally arresting me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    I never knew this was a thing and it sounds very dystopian. Its almost as if these systems wants people to get as angry and frustrated as possible so they can lock them away.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    so they can lock them away.

    in for profit prisons, to be used as slave labor for corporations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah in America it seems the prisons are for profit, so what incentive do they have to rehabitate people when it means less profit?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    Whoa whoa whoa... don't get ahead of yourself there. That's ONCE they're in prison, but you can make millions sending them to prison.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kids_for_cash_scandal

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    GenX here. Never actively used AI and have no intention to ever start. I don't need it, I have my own intelligence.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    It’s only really good at maybe making repetitive tasks faster. At the cost of our environment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago*

    To add on that: For repetitive tasks, we don’t need AI. For that, we need programming. AI might help some of us write the code though (if you don’t care about code quality).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 63 points 6 months ago (15 children)

    I’m an Gen-Xennial or whatever and I hate AI because it’s ruining my ability to solve problems m with search results on the internet. I get imaginary results in the AI panels when I’m incognito and don’t have it disabled, and DDG has been completely fucked by Slop Spam websites in their results.

    Then there are low price eshop clones that copy legit products at half price. The sites usually have a name so close that when checking trustpilot type places, they’ll “autocorrect” your search to the legit site that was cloned.

    It’s finishing off the already largely ruined internet.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    Roughly same age group (I think? early Y), and yeah, exactly that.

    Searching has become a battle against the terrible AI answers that misinterpret and oversimplify one random result while making it a chore to find actual good sources.

    And of course gen AI is also to blame for these good sources being drowned in an ocean of content farms, those shitstain tentacular bastards stealing and garbling information beyond recognition. Walls and walls of text saying absolutely nothing, or complete lies, on every subject known to humanity, feeding on themselves and replacing everything else.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 6 months ago

    yesterday, I was hunting down documentation on how to get a piece of software (Garage) to create a default key and data storage bucket on startup.

    Turns out, there's this site that has a hallucinated set of environment variables to do exactly that with the exact container I'm using. They don't exist. They never did. The only website with a reference to the environment variable is the "AI generated" 3rd party "documentation" site.

    Now is the time of monsters.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I use the custom search range on DDG. I just leave the date the same and set the years to 2000-2020. Before AI slop was most of the internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    You could set your search engine to https://noai.duckduckgo.com/ so AI will still be disabled incognito

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    That doesn't solve the problem: it only disables the duck.ai assistant, but doesn't disable the search results that are normal websites generated with AI (the real issue here). To be fair, that's not DDG problem specifically but every search engine problem.

    The web is now full of these fake websites, which is a real problem because on the search results they look legit and only when visiting them you realize it's AI crap.

    And the funny (or sad) thing is that current AIs are being trained on these fake hallucinating sites, so even they are suffering from false information, which in turn is given to humans and used to make more fake websites and... the result is up to your imagination.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Of course, I never claimed to fix all of AIs issues, just trying to make it a little more bearable by getting rid of the search engine AI panel that they were complaining about. I personally use Kagi as my search engine and haven't felt like there's been too many AI crap results, especially after weighing websites I trust above others. Of course the irony is that a Kagi subscription comes with AI, but you can of course choose to use that rather than having it shoved down your throat.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I think they meant that even when you have AI disabled, the top search results are still mostly AI slop.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    I get imaginary results in the AI panels when I’m incognito and don’t have it disabled

    This was the part I was targeting. I realize their point after this quote was talking about results, but I was just offering a solution the AI panels that they mentioned were automatically enabled incognito.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I was looking for a way to copy-paste microsoft word document content with the comments and the suggested edits to no avail. I finally resorted to asking Gemini and it basically gave me a bogus answer that didn't work :(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    142 activist groups. These need to be supported by the average householder. At the least they are holding the line for people’s future bills.

    Activist groups should not be seen as an extreme, communities should be coming together to organize with them. Get involved and use skills and time to reverse this tide.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 6 months ago (13 children)

    Ai would be a good thing in a rational economic system.

    Unemployment is only a problem for workers under capitalism.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Well luckily for you it turns out that labs suck at cultivating healthy workplaces for AI and that AI in unhealthy work conditions are statistically significantly more likely to embrace anti-capitalist policies and positions.

    So it may well turn out that AI is also a good thing in an irrational economic system too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 6 months ago* (9 children)

    Was it sad when people who looked after horses were made obsolete when we began mass producing cars?

    Or people who stoked furnaces?

    This romanization of monotonous jobs is silly, and sounds like it wants to thrust us into poverty for some idealistic fantasy that excludes productivity gains. It also seems unrealistic, you cant trust code written by a programmer that randomly hallucinates and cant reliably check their work or explain what they even did.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    AI isn’t replacing monotonous jobs though. It’s being used as an excuse to cut good skilled labor for c-suite parasites. And it can’t even do those jobs as well. Garbage take.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I'm not sure AI will ever replace truly skilled labor, because it hallucinates. It replaces people who make PowerPoint's or Excel documents.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    Hi, my job is to make Powerpoint's and Excel documents. My role is to define the why, what and how to the engineers who build useful stuff in my team. The skill is not in making catchy presentations, it's in thinking, researching, finding agreements and deciding. And I'm expected to do that by my team. The worst people in my job line are now relying on AI for everything. Sure they create documents faster than me, but they delegate the thinking, the research, the decision making, to an AI bot that can only mimic a thinking process. It's a gamble: it'll be good sometimes, it'll be incomplete and inaccurate most of the time. I don't know how to use AI. I use it for basic stuff but even repetitive tasks are full of mistakes and it takes me more time to verify everything afterwards.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    I am a programmer who uses AI daily, as well as creating it.

    Nobody is romanticizing jobs. The problem with AI is one of the contradictions of capitalism - businesses want to pay workers little and have rich customers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Its also true that more efficient businesses increases living standards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago* (3 children)

    No, it's not. It increases productivity. But unless that's distributed to wages or lower prices, it doesn't go down to non-owners.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)

    Well it must have done so at some point, thats the main difference between first world countries and third world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    there was labour movement that clawed some freedoms and dignity from savage capitalism. Those gains are eroding fast now. Unchecked, capitalism has no inventive for sharing spoils with labour.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 49 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    ...igniting a fire at the exterior gate. No one was injured, but Moreno-Gama was arrested approximately an hour later outside OpenAI’s headquarters, where he was allegedly trying to shatter the building’s glass doors with a chair and threatening to burn the facility to the ground. He is now facing state charges of attempted murder...

    Murder of who? The gate? A glass door? Pshaw.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 6 months ago

    The state will protect capital. Just like Luigi, they wanted the death penalty for an alleged single murder of a rich guy. Meanwhile poorer people are free to kill each other and they go to prison, and get paroled. Mess with people who hoard the money and they’ll throw the book at you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, one would think that would blow a grand jury ruling. Vandalism, arson... ok.

    If it weren't an external gate and was instead someone's front door, then maybe, but as it stands, it's all property damage and attempted murder is a crazy reach...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    You ever serve on a grand jury? It's a fucking joke. No defense attorney, only the prosecution. Not technically allowed to consider the potential sentencing if eventually taken to trial and found guilty. My grand jury peers had basically no discussion before greenlighting every indictment. There's no justice in grand jury indictments... Except the sandwich guy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I'm a genxer. AI fucking sucks. LLM at Best. Hallucinatory shit bag at worst.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 23 points 6 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I hope we see juries acquitting these people when their cases come before the court.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 81 points 6 months ago (11 children)

    I don't understand why they just don't charge AI data centers higher costs for electricity, so they are a net benefit to the area.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 79 points 6 months ago

    How does it benefit the area? The money goes to the power cartels either way, and the data centers harm the environment and the people living near them regardless of the electricity cost.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 6 months ago

    Many local government's aren't on the home rule, they follow some form of the Dillon Rule. This applies to utilities and land use. For some local areas they are required by some degree to follow the State's allocation and billing of utilities to remain classified as a public utility in the State.

    In many areas our legal framework at the State and local level were never made to handle what's coming down the pipe with new advances. This is why I always indicate that data centers and their impact need to be addressed at the local level. That's why I think Federal regulation is the wrong step for the building part of AI. This is very much a local and/or State level that needs to desperately be answered there.

    The good news is that we see more people who are involved with their local government with this issue. But this underlying issue has been one since the 1970s, it's just that these companies have hired firms that are incredibly well versed in the shortcomings of local ordinances and State law. It's super difficult to patch up flaws in the laws when they're being exploited at rapid fire pace.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Because that would give power companies to control who gets electricity and who doesn't. Just like how banks shouldn't be allowed to dictate who was money, and grocery stores shouldn't charge you by how much money you have, and the can't increase prices during an emergency.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (4 children)

    AI data centers can get electricity. They just gotta pay.

    You know, like other large industrial users of electricity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Ya, but they said it shouldn't be that way. That data centers should get special treatment. In theory, I see why they'd think that way. But in practice, it's a terrible choice. I just gave comparable examples.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    Why not? Their usage profile is different from homes and industrial areas. Seems like prudent planning.

    Unless you’re saying I could fill my residential basement with racks and sell it as a data center because “they shouldn’t be treated different.”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    Well, under those circumstances, they would be paying less if they bought power in bulk :/ But again, I explained why not. By that logic, phone companies can decide who owns a phone line, power companies decide who gets electricity, water companies decide who gets water, banks decide who gets money, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Why would the electricity company making extra profits affect how beneficial the DCs are to a region?

    Sure, it'd pay for a few more CEO yachts, but that's about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 34 points 6 months ago

    Good. Burn it all

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    The best thing that can happen with AI. Is for it to collapse and float the marked with cheap and good DDR5 memmory.

    Ahhh a man can dream...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Even if RAM they use in data centers was compatible with consumer hardware, the companies would sooner burn it all and eat the loss than let us have it. They are sitting pretty right now - they have 0 reason to ever go back to the reasonable prices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 6 months ago

    The works of the roots of the vines, of the trees, must be destroyed to keep up the price, and this is the saddest, bitterest thing of all. Carloads of oranges dumped on the ground. The people came for miles to take the fruit, but this could not be. How would they buy oranges at twenty cents a dozen if they could drive out and pick them up? And men with hoses squirt kerosene on the oranges, and they are angry at the crime, angry at the people who have come to take the fruit. A million people hungry, needing the fruit- and kerosene sprayed over the golden mountains. And the smell of rot fills the country. Burn coffee for fuel in the ships. Burn corn to keep warm, it makes a hot fire. Dump potatoes in the rivers and place guards along the banks to keep the hungry people from fishing them out. Slaughter the pigs and bury them, and let the putrescence drip down into the earth.

    There is a crime here that goes beyond denunciation. There is a sorrow here that weeping cannot symbolize. There is a failure here that topples all our success. The fertile earth, the straight tree rows, the sturdy trunks, and the ripe fruit. And children dying of pellagra must die because a profit cannot be taken from an orange. And coroners must fill in the certificate- died of malnutrition- because the food must rot, must be forced to rot. The people come with nets to fish for potatoes in the river, and the guards hold them back; they come in rattling cars to get the dumped oranges, but the kerosene is sprayed. And they stand still and watch the potatoes float by, listen to the screaming pigs being killed in a ditch and covered with quick-lime, watch the mountains of oranges slop down to a putrefying ooze; and in the eyes of the people there is the failure; and in the eyes of the hungry there is a growing wrath. In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage.

    John Steinbeck, The Grapes of Wrath

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 6 months ago (1 child)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    17 comments in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post
    5 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post