It's not a world government.

Exactly. The UN is NOT a world government and we need to stop expecting it to act as one. That was never the intention of the UN.

That being said, a lot of people talk about the necessity for the "rule of law," but there cannot be the rule of law without some kind of government with the authority to enact and ENFORCE laws. If nations are not willing to sign on to something like that, we cannot have the rule of law. Instead we will have the rule of whichever country has the largest, most powerful military and/or economic influence. I know a lot of Americans are fine with that arrangement because that position is currently occupied by the US, and has been for more than half a century, but the US might not always occupy that role. I wonder how those Americans would feel about this arrangement if China, for instance, were the world's hegemon instead of the US?

Trump's "Board of Peace" is intended as basically official world police and several countries have signed up for it because they want to actively enforce "peace" towards anyone they disagree with.

The UN will never succeed in anything useful unless their resolutions carry economic or military weight.

For a "place to gather and talk" they sure do use a lot of money and resources. Maybe they should switch to remote work lol

Ah, yes, whatever would we do if nobody was stopping international conflicts from getting out of control? If the UN werent there to stop them, we might have the most-heavily-armed nation in the history of humanity actively funding genocide by a client state (with the actual diplomats saying their goal was to start literal Armageddon), kidnapping heads of state, assassinating heads of state, and suborning the second-most-nuke-filled country's annexation of another country by lifting embargoes! Man, could you imagine if the headquarters of the United Nations were in THAT country, and everybody just... Did nothing? Man, what a crazy world we would live in.

It sure is a good thing that that same country doesn't also refuse to sign any of the treaties meant to "save us from hell", like the one saying "we won't use land mines", or the one saying "genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes are bad, and we should send people who do them to be punished", or, oh yeah, all those treaties that are meant to actually make it so we don't boil ourselves alive on a gods-forsaken world? Man, that would be wild.

Don't get me wrong: many UN organizations do really good work. Look at the WHO! Man, it's a good thing that that same country understands the important work of preventing and reducing the impact of the next Pandemic! What an awful world we would live in if they, say, decided to stop funding the WHO!

And as we can see, there ar no nazis in the world.

(I like the UN, but they really ar kinda useless..)