Ca aurait rien changé au résultats. J’espère ils apprendront leur lesson et amélioreront leur systeme.
C’est pas une raison d’abandonner l’e-vote car ca peut etre tres utiles pour les handi et puis les gens a l’etranger.
Ca aurait rien changé au résultats. J’espère ils apprendront leur lesson et amélioreront leur systeme.
C’est pas une raison d’abandonner l’e-vote car ca peut etre tres utiles pour les handi et puis les gens a l’etranger.
Electronic voting sucks. No way to audit anything.
2048 is a suspiciously round number (it's 2^11^) to the point that I came into the article expecting to read about an error affecting some subset of the records. But no, that's the exact number of votes cast using the system, out of a larger and less round pool of potential voters.
So apparently it's a coincidence, but it's making my brain itch.
Switzerland does not strike me as having a notable level of corruption or tax evasion, so nothing could even masquerade as a “good reason” for a cashless society there. I imagine the Swiss are also smart about national security and how a cashless society would compromise that. So not surprising the population opposes the war on cash.
But I guess the irony is that the politicians are not voting with the people despite Switzerland being known for having a direct democracy (even to an inappropriate extent considering how people vote on whether each naturalization candidate can take Swiss nationality).
1 comment