Programmer Humor

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 6 points 8 months ago (1 child)

AM?

🏁 1

parent

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 10 points 8 months ago

parent

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's not art, it's a fleshlight.

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

Conversely, if it's a fleshlight, then by definition it is art

parent

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

honestly, nm scale anything is so teensy it's art to me.

parent

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 5 points 8 months ago

Yeah, well I upvoted this when it said 69 upvotes, and I feel proud of that.

[–] JoShmoe@ani.social 3 points 8 months ago

Pattern recognition based spite and libido sounds like things someone would have already attempted.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 child)

Can* never

[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

No. Since this is based on something else, it follows the argumentation of the original.

parent

[–] Kojichan@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

Guess I'm a computer. shrugs

[–] SleveMcDichael@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago

Not necessarily, this only implies that computers are a part of a set of things that can be neither spiteful nor horny, and things that can be neither spiteful nor horny must never make art, not that all things that can be neither spiteful nor horny are computers.