cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/64497109

Source: https://eupolicy.social/@finnmyrstad/116141082378515849

❓️Have you noticed that digital products and services are getting worse? So have we!

➡️We have published a report about enshittification, on how and why digital products and services keep getting worse - and how we can turn the trend (hint: open tech, enforcement, public policy++)

Obviously @pluralistic is a big inspiration and help in this work.

More than 80 groups in Europe and the US has joined in a call to action.

More here: www.forbrukerradet.no/breakingfree

Enjoy this short film!

all 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 65 points 8 months ago

the Norwegian Consumer Council has delved into enshittification and how to resist it.

To every political entity in the world: Be more like Norway.

  • source
  • [–] 47 points 8 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 27 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    This makes me so proud to be Norwegian! (Which hasn’t been easy lately 😅)

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Why is that? Other than not winning any curling medals 😁

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I am guessing it has to do with the royal family. One of the kids assaulted and raped girls if I recall correctly and the princess has ties to Epstein

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • MAKE IT SHITTY!

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Anybody working on enshitification of Lemmy pls?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    enhsitificator looking kinda 🫣

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    Something about the way that garage is organized is so nice

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    I was hoping for it to end with "go opensource". But well, that would be asking for too much.

  • source
  • [+] 5 points 8 months ago* (1 child)
  • 10 comments in c/enshitification@slrpnk.net view that post
    [–] 25 points 8 months ago

    Grabbed the PDF and commented over here with:

    The Norweigans missed the most important (and easiest!) action:

    • Public services themselves need to get off Facebook & Twitter. If they can’t walk the walk and take their own advice, it’s not just an optical embarrassment. As someone who already boycotts the shitty gatekeepers (Cloudflare, google, ms, fb, apple, twtr), I am already free from enshittification

    except when I must interact with a public service.

    WTF?! The only unmanagable evil force I must deal with comes from the gov itself, who imposes shitty gatekeepers in the course of doing public tasks. I can’t boycott the government.

    Belgian public services ALL use Microsoft for their email. So you should do everything on paper in Belgium. But what do they do? They scan paper letter/form/submissions and then they email it to themselves via Microsoft’s server. I shit you not. Microsoft is inescapable even by the most disciplined. And it’s only because the government itself will not ditch the motherfuckers.

    Exceptionally, it’s somewhat redeeming that the Norweigans mention that public services should use open source. But that just scratches the surface. The very first thing they should do is get off Facebook and Twitter.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago

    This is incredible. Thank you for the hard work and incredible effort. This isn’t some low quality crap - this is golden

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    Fun video, but fucking hell.. even that webpage is enshitified by some vimeo garbage:

        Enable JavaScript and cookies in your browser settings.
        Once JavaScript and cookies are enabled, refresh this page.
    
    For detailed guidance on how to enable JavaScript and cookies in your browser, refer to your browser's help documentation or support website.
    
    Ray ID: …
    
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    Ray ID

    looks more like Cloudflare bot protection than vimeo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    It’s apparently a bit of both. I have never seen Cloudflare give those javasript messages. That was inside of a Vimeo frame on the webpage. But indeed CF is in play because of the ray id. Vimeo likely uses CF to push its enshitified content.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago

    I love "Shitx".

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    This is awesome. If another American happens to read this, here is the text of a letter I adapted from the letters I found on Breaking Free that you could send to your rep and senators (if you need an easier way to do this, check out resistbot):

    Letter text:

    I write as your [COUNTY/STATE] constituent to express serious concern about the increasing concentration of power in digital markets, the deterioration of digital services that American consumers and businesses depend on, and the risks posed by current moves to weaken oversight of dominant technology companies.

    At a time when digital services are becoming less useful and more exploitative, deregulatory efforts aimed at the technology sector represent an unprecedented risk to consumers, small businesses, and national security. Recent geopolitical instability has made clear how vulnerable our digital infrastructure becomes when a handful of dominant companies control the platforms on which our economy, communications, and civic life depend.

    Major technology companies are using their outsized market power and resources to steer innovation, shape markets to their advantage, and lobby decision-makers against meaningful oversight. They spend heavily to block or weaken privacy legislation, antitrust enforcement, and consumer protection rules. They exploit their dominance to normalize business models that depend on the mass collection and monetization of personal data—often in ways that are incompatible with Americans’ reasonable expectations of privacy and autonomy.

    These companies are locking in consumers and business customers, then degrading their services without fear of consequence. Websites and apps are increasingly overrun with ads and low-quality content. Useful features are removed or downgraded. Switching to alternatives is made deliberately difficult. This is not the behavior of companies competing in a healthy market—it is the behavior of monopolists extracting value from a captive user base.

    The United States still lacks comprehensive federal privacy legislation. Efforts like the American Data Privacy and Protection Act have stalled under industry pressure. Meanwhile, the Federal Trade Commission’s capacity to enforce existing consumer protection authority is under sustained attack. Proposals to limit the FTC’s rulemaking power and cut its enforcement budget would remove the last meaningful check on anticompetitive and exploitative practices in digital markets.

    Rather than weakening oversight, Congress should be taking concrete steps to restore competition and protect consumers. I urge you to support the following:

    First, rebalance power between service providers and consumers. Americans should be able to control their digital experiences: to decide how they use products they have purchased, to switch to alternative services without punitive barriers, and to modify services to suit their needs. Right-to-repair principles and data portability requirements are essential.

    Second, reduce dependency on dominant platforms. Competition in digital markets must be restored. This requires vigorous antitrust enforcement by the DOJ and FTC, and legislative action where existing law is insufficient. Congress should advance interoperability and data portability requirements that allow new competitors to emerge. The federal government, as one of the largest technology procurers in the world, should leverage its purchasing power to support open-standards-based alternatives to dominant platforms.

    Third, enforce existing laws. Far from hindering innovation, clear rules provide the guardrails that make fair competition and genuine innovation possible. Weak enforcement allows dominant firms to continue anticompetitive and harmful practices at the expense of consumer choice, service quality, and the competitive landscape. The FTC and DOJ must be adequately funded and empowered to carry out their enforcement mandates.

    Fourth, pass comprehensive federal privacy legislation and close legal loopholes. Americans deserve clear, enforceable protections against deceptive design patterns, manipulative personalization, and addictive interfaces. Without a strong federal standard, consumers are left with a patchwork of state laws that large companies can navigate and small competitors cannot.

    The digital economy touches every aspect of daily life in Tennessee and across the country. The path we are on, toward greater concentration, less competition, and weaker oversight, is not inevitable. With adequate enforcement of existing law, targeted new legislation, and strategic public investment in open alternatives, we can have a digital economy that serves the public rather than exploiting it.

    I appreciate your attention to these concerns and welcome the opportunity to discuss them further.

  • source