all 47 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 59 points 8 months ago (14 children)

I didn't realize there were states where groceries were taxed.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 8 months ago (8 children)

    I thought states that taxes groceries were the norm. If this is not true I will be even madder.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I live in ohio. Food not taxed, drinks are.

    In OHIO.

    Yeah, Ohio has its shit together more than your state.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I've lived in Missouri my whole life and never really grocery shop when I go out of state. You telling me other states just pay the sticker price?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 8 months ago (13 children)

    Really surprised to hear they have sales tax on ALL food, not just packaged stuff or restaurant food! Not sure what the rationale is for that.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Far from it dude! I’m in Canada.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    oh, yeah. most US states still require sales tax on all food, regardless of if it's raw or not.

    it's yet another one of those things Americans don't realize how fucked up it is until someone points out why it's fucked up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    The vast majority of states do not tax food items.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago

    keep in mind the definition of what foods are and are not taxed vary from state to state.

    some state may not tax you for a box of cereal, while another will because it's been prepared and is "ready to eat".

    that would mean that the only time tax benefit would help consumers is when they are buying raw foods such as fruits and vegetables. something that most Americans can't afford and usually purchase canned (processed).

    just because a state has a law that forbids them from "taxing groceries" doesn't mean there's a direct benefit to consumers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago*

    Its a republican majority in Missouri.

    That's why.

    And yes I know a republican suggested this bill. It's all theater. Get one of them to introduce something like this so the rest can strike it down but then you feel some slight glimmer of hope because, "well_ they are trying to help us!!"

    But they aren't. They never are.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    In the EU and the UK all food has sales tax. It's around 20 percent for "luxury" food and around 5 percent for necessary food like bread and milk (some countries have more levels, like France, which has 20, 10, 5 and 2.5).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 8 months ago

    The state of misery always lives up to its name.

  • source
  • [+] 37 points 8 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah fuck the bill’s sponsor and her desire to reduce costs for a family of four by $50 every month

    State Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman, an Arnold Republican, said the bill is an attempt to increase affordability for Missourians as prices rise.

    “Missourians are paying more and more for necessities,” Coleman said. “Most of us agree fundamentally that essential services should not be funded on the backs of the poor.”

    Coleman said a family of four would save $54 per month with the removal of grocery sales tax.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    It's nice to try to reduce the cost for the citizens but with less tax money some other tax needs to be increased or some service will have to save money.

    Dimmitt also said that because the bulk of property taxes go to schools and other jurisdictions, local governments rely on sales taxes to fund police and fire departments, road repairs, trash and recycling, among many other services.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    Regressive taxes are the name of the game. Tax the poors and get them pay for the government.

    That is all tariffs are as well. A regressive tax that the poor pay. They had been trying to ram through a flat tax which would do the same thing for years and now they are doing it underhandedly with tariffs.

    That is why the Republicans aren't throwing a fit, because it is secretly exactly what they have always wanted.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    Tax cuts only benefit corporations. They already price their goods at the maximum that consumers will (read: are able to) pay. Guess what happens if consumers can suddenly pay 10% more because they don’t have to pay 10% tax?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    well you no longer have to do the off-label calculation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    one of the things i love about australian taxes: by law the displayed price must include all taxes… the price on the label/menu/sign/website/whatever is the price you pay… by law

    always catches me out in the US adding tax and tip 😓 i end up spending way more than i’d intended and having a far worse experience because of it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    So the opposite must be true too right? When taxes go way up companies drop their prices to compensate because, according to you they only charge what consumers can pay. Except that doesn't happen at all. Instead tariffs just caused prices to go way up without any intervention by corporations.

    What complete nonsense.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    $54 a month isn't exactly a lot. I'd question the sense of that tax altogether, because it induces processing and collection costs

  • source