If you’re anything like my parents, you probably wouldn’t even understand most of the content that floods my social media, no matter how hard I try to avoid it.

Here’s a recent example from Instagram: “Do y’all females ever tell ur homegirls ‘Sis chill you letting too many dudes hit?’” Essentially, that means: “Women – do you ever tell your girlfriends that they’re whores and need to stop letting so many guys fuck them?” The reel, posted by a 19-year-old man, appeared on my Instagram feed without me wanting to see it, or ever interacting with any other similar content. The comments that followed were pure misogyny. “Women see body count as a leaderboard and they try to outdo each other,” was one of them. Translation: all women are competitively promiscuous.

Consider the use of the word “female” in these posts. It is not a neutral term here, it is a term of abuse. It’s used by teenage boys to degrade us and equate us to animals. Boys are never described as “males”, but girls are always “females” – the equivalent of sows or calves, creatures that are less than human. We’re also “thots” (whores), “community pussy” and “bops”. “Bop” stands for “been over passed” and is a derogatory term used by boys to refer to a girl they’ve decided has been “passed around” or had too much sex. Sexual equality has ceased to exist online. It’s absolutely fine for boys to have sex, but when girls do, they are called worthless and referred to as objects. “When community pussy tries to insult me, I just want to beat that bitch up.” That’s a message I saw on TikTok.

I’m a 15-year-old schoolgirl and like most teenagers I spend a fair portion of my spare time on social media, often scrolling through short-form videos on apps such as Instagram or TikTok. All of my friends use those apps, and many spend multiple hours a day on them. I actively try to avoid online misogyny, but I am met with it incessantly whenever I open my mainstream social media apps. It only takes a few minutes before there’s subtle or overt misogyny, such as comment sections on a girl’s post filled with remarks about her body, videos made by men or boys captioned with a degrading joke, and even topics such as domestic violence or rape, trivialised and laughed about.

top 74 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 126 points 8 months ago (5 children)

The age verification debate misses the real point. These commercial algorithms are harmful for everybody.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    The identity verification debate is the point and it is the only reason this article exists in the first place.

    These commercial algorithms are harmful for everybody.

    Also true.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago

    From what I'm seeing, the messaging is "we want to protect children, thus age verification".

    To your point, it is identity verification they're doing.

    My point is, age verification isn't even the right solution to the problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    It's a business of outrage. Just say the most vile things you can think of, wait for some people to react to it, no matter how, and watch the algorithm do it's work. Congratulation you are now an influencer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 118 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (20 children)

    Using social media has ruined my self-esteem and my relation to being a girl in this world, and nearly every day I feel hatred towards my gender, my appearance, or even teenage boys as a category. The misogyny I see from boys my age online, which is echoed in real life too, has made me grow resentful and bitter towards them, as much as I try to avoid it. As wrong as it is, I persistently find myself considering if there are truly any boys out there who are not misogynistic to some extent, and have even questioned whether I can find love in the future because of this. I understand that boys are victims of harmful content, as well as perpetrators of online misogyny – they’re growing up learning how to do this from the adults who post misogynistic videos first. But even so, I feel such a strong divide now between girls and boys in my generation, especially when the way they talk about us in real life mirrors the way they do on the internet.

    That’s fucked up.

    That level of misogyny is definitely learned, but it’s not just her age group. I’m floored by (for example) some comments my Dad makes, a “quiet, respectful, classy” type guy who’s never had a Facebook or Insta, who’d you’d never expect to hear insults from. And it’s definitely worse after he watches Fox News… that shit is like a drug.

    My school “friends” dropped my jaw, sometimes. They got a lot from their parents, but social media (Faceboook back then) absolutely made it worse.

    Even here on Lemmy, the disrespect or casual sexism from commenters sometimes makes me want to throw up. Not that I’m a particularly standup guy or anything, but the longer I live, the more I wonder “the fuck happened to my sex?” I certainly can’t critique this girl for wondering the same thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 68 points 8 months ago (19 children)

    Yeah, I feel like a lot of the people here going "just don't use social media then" are missing part of the point. Like, as she specifically mentioned, the misogynistic discourse happening online is also happening offline. Even if you yourself manage to avoid most online misogyny by not using social media, you'll still be exposed to it through everyone else who is and all the people watching and reading stuff like Fox. It's just kind of everywhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 8 months ago* (16 children)

    Exactly! Precisely. It’s affecting her real life, too.

    That “just don’t use social media then” response in itself feels… misogynistic? This isn’t her choice; she can’t ignore the catastrophic effects.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    "Stop using social media" is probably good advice for everyone, but as you say, its not the solution to the this problem unless literally everyone follows it and even then there is more to do since its not like the internet invented misogyny.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago*

    Yeah, it is great advice. But I'm under no illusion that's happening anytime soon, not for most people.

    The context matters. And in this instance “stop using social media” feels more like blaming the abused teenager while the rest of the world carries on, like its totally dismissive of what she's saying.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 42 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    It feels very reminiscent of "well don't dress like that then"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 30 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Yup. And that's bullshit. It's way past the time we should be teaching boys how to NOT be misogynistic asswipes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    The thing is, teenage boys learn this behavior from social media. If we had told boys not to use it, they might have not turned out like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    If misogyny has been around for centuries (and it has) who taught boys back in the 1600's to be sexist assholes?

    It didn't originate from social media. It started with fathers teaching their sons that they were more important and special than girls were.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -14 points 8 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 17 points 8 months ago

    the issue isn't just that she's reading and hearing these comments online, the issue is that teenage boys are doing so. social media has normalised this kind of behaviour to them, and they bring those views with them to the real world where girls will interact with them: school, sports clubs etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    I'm reporting you for still not even bothering to read the fucking article. The is un-fucking-real. Just open the fucking link and absorb the words written in it. Then come back and apologize for being an asshole.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (4 children)

    Yeah I've already read it. Feel free to use the report button however you choose, though. That's what it is there for!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago* (3 children)

    Oh ok, great, so you've now learned the problem extends to real life, and the boys around her talk this way in person as well as online. So just quitting the entire Internet wouldn't help in the slightest. What's your apology gonna be like?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    So just quitting the entire Internet wouldn’t help in the slightest.

    help

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/help

    slightest

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/slightest

    So not voluntarily subjecting herself to internet abuse would ...not... improve the situation in at least the smallest way? Are you sure?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Part of the problem is that it's a feedback loop. People use social media and somebody makes some misogynistic content which angers people which then gets the algorithm to promote it heavily. Then somebody else who's inspired by that content makes their own misogynistic content and the cycle repeats. Once enough of that content is circulating it becomes the norm and a bunch of people start dogpiling on it to be part of the in crowd. It's particularly pernicious when it's being used to blame people's problems on others which is how the incel and red pill groups got their start.

    It's not just the girls/women that need to get off these platforms, it's the boys/men as well. Algorithms that reward anger and controversy are a significant part of the problem and really should be looked at to be regulated the same way gambling and addictive drugs are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago*

    should be looked at to be regulated the same way gambling and addictive drugs are.

    Yet here we are, still in the War on Drugs. Betting apps are exploding in popularity and being straight up paraded by politicians and business leaders.

    I agree with the sentiment, but I don’t think the engagement feedback issue will be addressed directly. It’s too profitable. We’re cooked, for a while. So maybe we should reach for every half measure with a chance of passing, like restricting kids?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 39 points 8 months ago (15 children)

    Sexual equality has ceased to exist online. It’s absolutely fine for boys to have sex, but when girls do, they are called worthless and referred to as objects.

    This isn't new. I'm a man in my mid 40s and the disparity between how promiscuous men are viewed as compared to promiscuous women has existed for as long as I've been sexually aware, and well before.

    Obviously that doesn't make it okay. I also have no idea what the solution might be. There have been a few cultural efforts to normalize the idea of women enjoying and seeking out sex but none of them seem to really reach the people that need to hear it.

    I do find it oddly paradoxical that men who make it very clear that they are actively seeking sexual partners would disparage women for being sexually active.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 8 months ago (14 children)

    I do find it oddly paradoxical that men who make it very clear that they are actively seeking sexual partners would disparage women for being sexually active.

    They don't want experienced, knowledgable, self-confident partners. They want naive young women they can gaslight and abuse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [+] -36 points 8 months ago (13 children)

    They don’t want experienced, knowledgable, self-confident partners. They want naive young women

    You've obviously never lived with the aftermath of dating worn out, bitter and combative women who have been traumatized by their numerous "experiences." Men like inexperienced women precisely because they want to mold her and give her her first experiences. Also, "experienced" women are more likely to be single moms.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    Let's take a moment. I want you to understand that the opinion you offered is precisely what the OP article references. More than that, the opinion you offered is factually wrong.

    I would like you to hear from me - an anonymous poster - the most likely outcome (of that opinion you offered) is a lonely, sad, and bitter existence for you.

    Your preferences for certain kinds of women are yours, and yours alone. I wish you luck in finding a woman that fits your preference. However if you truly believe in that opinion, i strongly recommend seeking professional help.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    Your comment actually made me feel sick. Please go re-evaluate where this toxicity in your life has come from.

    Hint: it's not women

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Your intolerant ad-hominem post offers no constructive rebuttal of a good-faith argument and should be deleted by the mods.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)

    Your blithe refusal to engage my constructive rebuttal of your uneducated and intolerant opinion (linked here for your convenience) renders this pearl-clutching statement irrelevant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    My posts are almost always based on logic. I do not engage in insult posts, like you did.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 75 points 8 months ago (10 children)

    Delete TikTok and Instagram for starters.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 8 months ago (9 children)

    This is simple advice for an adult who isn’t mired in the drama of high school. For most teens, these apps are how they socialise, how they share information and learn what is cool or uncool. Deleting the apps means you have cut yourself off from the social system and have made yourself a social pariah.

    An equivalent for the millennials and gen Xers would be not having Facebook as a teen. It meant not being invited to parties because Facebook was the only platform people used to plan events. No one was going to seek you out individually because it was assumed you were on Facebook and would see the updates.

    I agree that social media is harming all of us, but telling teens to just not use it ignores what it was like to be a teenager.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I agree with this sentiment, but fuck do I feel old rn. Myspace was my generation's Facebook. And it was so much cooler! Custom backgrounds/layouts, and music. Facebook just seems so sterilized in comparison, and it makes me sad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    And even MySpace had ‘Top Friends’ that dictated social hierarchy. For as long as there has been social media, teens have been socially required to interact with it.

    I dont agree with it, and would prefer to see all social media burning to the ground, but I understand the situation that teenagers are in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    The situation is that whatever the cool kids are doing is cool. It might be looking at TikTok, it might be not looking at TikTok. It's going to change depending on where you go and what the cool kids do at that school.

    Who knows what's cool these days. Best advice is to just do what you enjoy and hope for the best. I certainly wouldn't want to be a teenager all over again. They're ruthless for no reason. And I wasn't any better. I'm not proud of it. But that's why I can tell you, it matters little what you do, it's all about who does it.

    I got little cousins that are much younger than I. And from what I gathered. It's not much different now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago

    As someone who was never fond of the concept of social media, and who never had a MySpace or Facebook account as a result when I was in my late teens/early twenties - this hits home for me.

    I did it knowingly, but I sure missed out on a lot of stuff that I usually only found out months after.

    For a while my friends nicknamed me "the untagable" 🤣, but I guess not having my entire dumb early adulthood saved for eternity is a win in the end.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Facebook didn't exist when Gen X was in highschool, likely all of them had been through college.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    Not sure why you were downvoted, but you're correct - I'm a late Gen Xer, and Facebook launched several years after I finished grad school - and didn't become mainstream for another few years.

    MySpace was started only one year earlier than Facebook. So, basically, the social media online that I knew before then were forums (like car forums that still exist).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    As a Xennial, I still don't get it because, I guess, I embraced being the weirdo at school and hung out with the weirdos. I was bullied for wearing secondhand uniforms, not wearing doc martens, not having the backpack that everyone has, never having a bf, not talking l33t etc, etc...

    I say, take that fall. Embrace destruction and delete the apps. Be the weird analogue kid.

    But then again, maybe Australian kids weren't massive arseholes.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 35 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I'm a whole cisgendered 30 year old male who games a bit too much, so I try to discourage misogynistic comments when they're made by people in games.

    I think there's another layer to the misogyny where any form of "defending" women is seen as white-knighting or simping. You don't even have to be directly referring to comments about a specific person, but you'll still be labeled as a loser who likes women, for some reason.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Dont defend, it doesnt do shit. Clown the person talking about it. Its easy to get a dogpile going if you are obviously wittier than them and much more effective in getting them to knock it off

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    Unironically this. Yesterday I told a skinhead I didn't wanna see his "white lives matter" shirt again, and when he asked why not in the most shitlordy tone imaginable, my blunt reply of "it's loser shit" put him in his place way better than any drawn out debate about the history and semantics of race ever would have done. These dweebs rely not on any sort of moral truth but on the aesthetic of strength, which is why it's always important to deny them that and hammer home just how much reactionaries are in reality just pathetic (often overgrown) boys whom everybody knows to be insufferable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 81 points 8 months ago*

    Subheading:

    Objectification, hate, rape threats: the politicians debating online abuse mean well, but to truly understand, they need to see what I see

    No, they don't.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I was an early Facebook user. I had an account from 2007-2018. The early years it seemed fun and Fairly innocent. I kept up with friends and saw funny posts. I could curate my feed to be things I wanted to see. When I left Facebook in 2018 it seems like the app was targeting me. Showing me things to rile me up. First I quit the mobile app. I deleted it and used a browser. Then I left Facebook altogether. A year ago I did a similar thing with Instagram. It was no longer a place curated to my interests. It’s horrible. I barely touch it anymore. Even Reddit is not my usual collection of posts that interests me. It’s why I’m on here! Everything is just so polarizing now. I have been able to cut way back and do my own thing. But at 15 friends are your world. Everyone is using the app. Everyone is speaking the speak. It’s so hard for them to disconnect.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    What's interesting is that in the early online days, there was still a lot of misogyny. In the early days of Friendster / Myspace there were a lot more guys online than girls. By the time Facebook started to come around, being online was more of a normal thing, so there were more women and girls online. But, at least at the beginning, the feeds were smaller (mostly just posts from friends) and tended not to be algorithmic. It was a timeline, not a feed.

    So, there was a bit of a golden period when all young people were starting to go online, so it wasn't just a small, male-dominated space any more. There also weren't algorithmic feeds yet, or influencers, and nowhere near the level of surveillance-based advertising. These days the big social media companies feel that their audience is locked in, and have nowhere to go, so they're squeezing them, trying to extract as much value as possible.

    If you're a 15-year-old girl your options are really being ostracized by the other teens for not using the apps, or using the apps and dealing with all that shit. I don't know if being a teen girl has ever been a wonderful experience. But, I sure wouldn't want to be one right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago

    By the time Facebook started to come around, being online was more of a normal thing, so there were more women and girls online.

    Well, yes, that's why Zuck started Facemash, to let him and his pals rate the faces of those people.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 45 points 8 months ago* (4 children)

    I was gonna say unpopular opinion, but maybe not...

    disengage from social media. It is not reality. not only that, but it perpetuates itself, and the oligarchy that created it. Go out and meet people in the real world. This is comming from an autistic person with minimal patients for other people. Seriously, ditch social media; it's poison, and when it dies (which it will if people like you leave) these toxic peope you encounter will have to face the real world.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • Social media like everything else takes personal responsibility. I have an IG and it’s full of yummy desserts, puppy videos, my bands and pics of my kids so my parents can see.

    It’s up to everyone what they do on social media and what they consume, just like television, don’t just watch porn, Fox News and trash tv, and say it’s TVs fault. It’s a medium like everything else, stay away from the crazies and if you can’t handle it don’t use it

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Yep, some is a shitplace, that only shows you very sterotypical things about the world around you, through very disective algorythms. It learns you about how small the world is, how we all are the same. When we are not! Humans are complex individuals the world is huge. That is social medias first lie. But you are in fact all just numbers to them. Social media, reduces us to numbers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 58 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    Let me guess the solution before reading the article - some form of weakening to digital privacy.

    Yep: "A social media ban for under-16s might prevent young boys seeing endless content that treats women with contempt and hate. Boys at this age are very susceptible to the cool and funny framing of what is, in reality, relentless misogyny. A ban might not fix the problem, but it would help. If society can’t stop it, it can show it disapproves."

    Essentially, this article is an argument to introduce online ID, and I disagree with that on a fundamental level.

    The soil misogyny has dug it's roots into is the iniquity we created while seeking equity. It was done for the best of reasons, but now we see the price. That's not a problem we can solve easily, and certainly not via creating state spying infrastructure.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    We have mostly 50-80 year old Republicans pushing to strip women of rights and somehow misogyny is all the internets fault? This is a deep societal problem that can't be fixed by internet law.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago

    Word it like that, the guardian has some pretty authoritarian leaning shit.

    The main pieces of the article don't read like fabricated and are possibly genuine; however, the last part about the ban might be an deliberate attempt to manipulate the reader using emotional baggage after reading the main section. It may aswell be injected there by the Guardian, and its probable the author didn't even think about the bans.

    This yet again is ageism in a nutshell. The Guardian has completely invalidated the authors claims, just because they are a minor. This is where humanity is going: misogyny, ageism, and deliberate injection of stories with malicious intent.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    Let me guess the solution before reading the article - some form of weakening to digital privacy

    What would be your solution to this problem?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Funding education, funding social services, funding mental healthcare. Enforcing existing laws against harassment on big tech.

    One of the biggest social media platforms is spamming child porn, they've all been proven to be addictive on purpose, and we're blaming teenage users.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Funding education, funding social services, funding mental healthcare. Enforcing existing laws against harassment on big tech.

    That's a solution that maybe, possibly, will solve the issue 30 years from now (because we need to educate not only the kids, but - most importantly - their parents).

    It also doesn't solve the issue of state (or state-adjacent) actors purposefully spreading content designed to cause disruption and chaos.

    One of the biggest social media platforms is spamming child porn, they’ve all been proven to be addictive on purpose, and we’re blaming teenage users.

    At least in the context of the article in the OP, and the comment I'm replying to - nobody is blaming anything on anyone. At least I don't see it.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    72 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    12 comments in c/womensstuff@piefed.blahaj.zone view that post