all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)

Grandstanding for his own presidential run. Any such payment will never come out of Trump's pockets (which he's been lining with all the taxpayer-funded government money he can - including massively increasing the National Debt - at a furious pace since returning to office), but instead the from taxpayers of the entire country who have been similarly screwed and also left holding the bill for Trump's grifts. Pritzker knows this, and is scum for being no less dishonest about it in an attempt to use it to his advantage.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    Every governor should be demanding the same for their states.

    The federal government stole that money from Americans and should be liable for paying it back. They can't brag that they've made billions in tariff money when it was stolen from Americans. Because of their actions the federal government will likely lose billions if they were forced to pay it back which would be rightfully owed.

    They wont pay it back though because so one is there to enforce it.

  • source
  • parent
  • 44 comments in c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 75 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    Bruh should have signed off with:

    "Thank you for your attention to this matter"

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    If that president could read, he'd be very upset

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 30 points 8 months ago

    Noticed that he wrote it so someone with a third grade reading comprehension level wouldn’t have a problem.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 8 months ago

    And the saber rattling gets even louder. Maybe one day they’ll think about unsheathing them.

    Though that will not be today.

    [set message to repeat 1x/day]

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    If this was serious it would be a lawsuit instead of a letter

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)

    You can't sue the federal government unless they give you explicit permission to. They have sovereign immunity except when they intentionally waive that immunity, such as with the Federal Tort Claims Act. You can challenge the constitutionality of a law or policy, fight to have it overturned, but you cannot seek repayment for damages caused by that law or policy without meeting the conditions under which the government has said you can.

    The FTCA is the primary mechanism to sue the fed and the allowances of it are pretty narrow. Tariffs, even illegal ones, would likely fall under the discretionary function exception, which would mean that you couldn't sue. But even if it didn't fall under that exception, in order to sue, you must first submit an FTCA claim for repayment of damages to the goverment and wait for their response. Claims must be made within 2 years of the damages and they have 6 months to respond. Only once actually denied can you actually sue, and it must be within 6 months of their response. And then you have to materially prove damages directly caused by the federal government, specifically.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago

    Trump is too busy wiping his ass with the constitution to care.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago
    [–] 8 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    He gets respect from simply using an 'Oxford comma'.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    Am I tripping, I can't see that oxford comma you're talking about

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    It's nice to have a governor in my State that's actually good at his job and not grifting the taxpayers..

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    that money (if it's paid out at all) will go to businesses who already passed all the cost of tariffs onto consumers, and taxpayers would cover this if it's paid back so businesses are fleecing americans twice for free

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    The tariffs were pushed by Trump, businesses didn't invent them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (1 child)

    trump is just a proxy for the business council, same as every president back through to eisenhower and beyond.

    they knew back at the start that the cost of tariffs would be pushed onto consumers, and that eventually they would argue for refunds (which again, are paid for by consumers), all of this is done specifically to stress the system trying to trigger an economic crash...as that's when american capitalists make their biggest gains, buying up distressed assets at a massive discount.

    we have done this cycle dozens of times over by now

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago*

    A very good question.

    If, somehow, this actually becomes a real lawsuit, and somehow actually results in a real judgement, and somehow the regime actually pays the judgement rather than just ignoring it ... watch this money just end up in the state's budget, with none of it going to the people who were actually illegally overcharged for everything. (And then the state spends most of it on buying fancy new guns and surveillance tech for the state police. Chrome-plated missile launchers for the state troopers!)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    So they hang him?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago* (3 children)

    Ooooo, more political theater by the controlled opposition to deceive the proles and perpetuate the illusion of choice in order to prop up the regime of liberal-fascist collaboration.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Yes because some Dems are bad therefore all are equally bad, .ml and having the minds of children go hand in hand. Having this many stupid people in the country is so depressing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)

    He’s ok but he’s still a billionaire and cousins with Epstein pedofile scum. I don’t think you can be a decent person and be a billionaire

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, let's throw shit at a potential ally because they are cousin to a criminal!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    Their whole point was that you cannot be a billionaire without being a criminal yourself.

    Ifsofacto, billionaires cannot be potential allies because that level of wealth hoarding is inemical to the interests of the many.

    When we say "eat the rich", we dont mean some of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -15 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Pay some goddamn taxes, JB.

    Also, maybe do something substantial instead of sternly-worded letters.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    We are like 12 hrs into this. I am happy to see there's already numbers drawn up as if they've been planning for this. I'm sure this won't be the last we hear

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments