all 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 76 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Had to make sure to censor that from field huh?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 42 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Blatant violation of the law itself, this will come back to haunt them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 31 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Huh... what ever could Mr. Redacted be referring to? It's just too complex of a mystery for me to decipher.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

    There are several others from what look like the same person:

    https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01743615.pdf.
    https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01744660.pdf.
    https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01743644.pdf.
    https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01743632.pdf.

    Then there are others that looks like from the same person that still have the images (semi-redacted) and they look quite young

    <edit_01> They sign one:

    Love
    A

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)

    why the fuck would they redact the sender of this

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment