post
One man's extortion is another man's bribery.
Two sides of the same coin.
I feel like this thread is somehow interpreting the "bribery" payment as malicious on Paramount's part. If a corrupt cop is going to arrest you for made up charges unless you grease his palms, you're not being malicious or unethical, you're not somehow getting something out of the exchange that you otherwise wouldn't have, you're just being extorted by a corrupt cop.
Except that the company wants another merger, not simply to exist. They wouldn't go to jail, they just wouldn't pad the pockets of certain execs and/or shareholders
Paramount being capitalist is a red herring. That would have been the case regardless of trump being corrupt. Settling the extortion payment had to happen for them to stop being harassed. The fact that they want to stop being harassed....so that they can continue doing the same capitalist bullshit they would have done regardless is irrelevant. It's not the flip side of an extortion coin, it's a completely separate unethical practice to try to confuse and divide criticism. This is step one in fostering a "both sides" argument.
So, just another Republican donation, will they also be part of the Big Bill of Garbage now that they've sponsored fascism?
Do not ever, ever pay Paramount+ for their service. Fuck all of them.
Anyway, what's this article about?
I wonder what Trump would say if he found out Paramount paid Matt Stone and Trey Parker $900 million.
all 15 comments