I wouldn't normally post Times articles but they seem to be the first to run this bit of rare good news.

all 38 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 30 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I can't read the full article, but it says it'll be optional. That sounds like they're still wanting to develop it, spend the money, and then say "well now we've got it, it would be silly not to use it!"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Exactly, this is how Labour force ID, then on to verifying your ID before you can use the internet, all posts will be moderated by government AI produced by Palantir

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago

    From the BBC article:

    The Liberal Democrats said the policy was "doomed to failure" from the start and called for "the billions of pounds earmarked for their mandatory digital ID scheme" to be spent "on the NHS and frontline policing instead".

    Damn right. We want our money spent on something useful.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago

    Quietly rolls back policy after the news cycle has moved on.... Interesting

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Good news! No doubt the next Labour government will try again though.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago*

    I'm happy this has happened. I'm still pretty wary, though. Can there be a cross party debate and agreement on what the limits should be? I worry the "mandatory" part will just get pushed through later on, like the encryption backdoor clause of the OSA.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    Oh sweet, I can hate labour slightly less. Drop the OSA next and I might even be able to reluctantly approve of them.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Drop the OSA, free all the non-violent protesters, drop the threat to Jury trials, and publicly apologise for being a complete fascist cunt. Then, maybe they deserve a second chance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    And stop sending weapons to israel

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

    That was already stopped a while ago.

    E: are people angry that it stopped?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    Why do you still tell this lie. I put you straight on this a while back. Some 30 licenses were suspended in 2024, hundreds of licenses are still active. The UK still arms Israel.
    You claimed this before, and I showed you the evidence that you were wrong. You are still repeating the claim. You are a liar.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago
    [–] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Good. The gov.uk ‘one login’ they are already rolling out is plenty good enough without the massive overreach of digital id.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I'm not from the UK and also don't have any background on this, can you perhaps explain why it's overreach?

    I would think that ID documents being digital is a logical step to digitisation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (17 children)

    Is there any major Labour policy that hasn't been U-turned on?

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I'd rather they u-turned shitty ideas than waffle-stomp them through.
    How the fuck the OSA seemed to just drift through is astounding

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    Because unfortunately, all our politicians want it, and the public wants it too.

    Reddit and Lemmy are very much in the minority on OSA.

    Which is a shame, because I find the OSA to be stupid and unworkable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I genuinely don't understand everyone complaining about u-turns. Setting aside that this isn't really a u-turn, they're still doing it, just won't be mandatory.

    Would you rather a government that dogmatically sticks to every single idea they have regardless of public opinion, or a government that changes its policies in response to feedback?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    My issue is the government coming up with ideas that everyone can see from the outset are doomed to fail, for seemingly arbritray reasons, and then rolling them back when the inevitable happens.

    Winter fuel being the most glaring: we need to show the banks we're fiscally responsible, we then have no material change in how the banks view the government but have a minor shift in the forecasts for 5 years time, we've done it, we're fiscally responsible now so pensioners can have their £500 back.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    They publicly condemned Israel, committed to arresting Netanyahu if he ever came here, sanctioned much of the Israeli parliament, refused to join the US/Israel in attacking Iran, ramped up humanitarian aid for Palestine, stopped weapons exports to Israel, and formally recognised Palestine.

    I struggle to see this rabid support of Israel that Lemmy posters always seem to talk about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Nope. They publicly supported Israeli "right" to starve Gaza, criminalised the support of a direct action group that opposes the genocide, continue to arm Israel, allowed Israel to attack British boats and kidnap British citizens sailing on them, continue to fly spy planes for Israel and refuel their planes at Akrotiri.

    The UK government is complicit in genocide.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    criminalised the support of a direct action group that opposes the genocide,

    No. They proscribed a group that ram raided factories with workers inside, advocated for genocide, trashed businesses for having Jewish owners, smashed a policewoman's back while she was incapacitated on the floor with a sledgehammer, and broke into an RAF base and destroyed the engines of two jets.

    allowed Israel to attack British boats and kidnap British citizens

    More bullshit

    continue to fly spy planes for Israel

    They warned Israel against targeting civilians and gave them information on Hamas installations in an attempt to lessen civilian casualties.

    and refuel their planes at Akrotiri

    Stop fucking lying. Israel and the UK don't even have compatible fueling systems.

    The UK government is complicit in genocide.

    If you believe that, you are brain-dead. Re-read the above comment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 10 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    I don't see how. Starmer is getting closer to the EU.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    Tinkering around the edges is what it looks like. In the world we live in Starmer is happy to avoid putting the case to the people of the UK that we should be in the EU and instead is banking on "well we've already done deals with India and the US". India being a country that is extremely happy to buy Russian gas on the cheap to help fuel their war against Ukraine and the US being.... well the US.

    I don't pretend it's easy for him to do. But he's not even trying in my mind.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago