cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/56776769

SOURCE CODE DISCLOSURE:

BACKGROUND PERMISSION RESTRICTIONS:

  • Apps cannot access cameras, microphones or location services in the background when phones are inactive. Continuous status bar notifications are required when these permissions are active.

PERMISSION REVIEW ALERTS:

  • Devices must periodically display warnings prompting users to review all app permissions, with continuous notifications.

ONE-YEAR LOG RETENTION:

  • Devices must store security audit logs, including app installations and login attempts, for 12 months.

PERIODIC MALWARE SCANNING:

OPTION TO REMOVE PRE-INSTALLED APPS:

INFORMING GOVERNMENT OF MAJOR UPDATES:

TAMPER-DETECTION WARNINGS:

  • Devices must detect if phones have been rooted or "jailbroken", where users bypass built-in security restrictions, and display continuous warning banners to recommend corrective measures.

ANTI-ROLLBACK PROTECTION:

  • Phones must permanently block installation of older software versions, even if officially signed by the manufacturer, to prevent security downgrades.

all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 10 months ago

Anti rollback shoud have exceptions for when new software is bad/broken, you would be able to unlock/disable this feature (with some boot alerts or something).

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Do it. Let's see who's more powerful.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    Our government has some technologically illiterate morons

  • source
  • 4 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    From the same government who brought you the mandated spyware app with access to all your phone?

    ETA - there’s good stuff mixed in with bad here. Permission is good, but Losing control of the device (version restrictions) isn’t good and those audit logs are creepy.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    Given that these same objecting companies have had tens of thousands of Indian developers, with source code access for iOS and Android, on their payrolls for decades now ... I am not sure why they would suddenly be worried about this now.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Ehh. If they do this just for goverment software they would be in a good position. Otherwise a lot of asking for trust that doesnt seemed earned at all

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    If Inroot my phone that banner is getting removed first.

    The background permissions thing is already a thing.

    Some are crazy authoritarian shit and others are pro consumer.

  • source