all 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 18 points 10 months ago*

89% of the population of the Greenland is Inuit. If this doesn't scream Imperialism, I don't know what does.

This is something more people need to know about

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Oh there's no plans to make them Americans. They'll be made an unincorporated territory with no voting rights where the constitution doesn't fully apply. Not that it applies much anymore anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    I'm Canadian, but if Trump offered us 1 million each to join the USA I would still tell them to pound sand.

  • source
  • [+] 7 points 10 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 29 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Is it? Seems like a perfect time to say it. They just want to be their own thing. It isn’t like this is a new sentiment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 10 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    This is one of the primary arguments used all throughout colonial times. And it’s as bullshit now as it was then. It essentially claims all sovereign states to which another more powerful state exists in opposition, should relinquish the desire for sovereignty.

    It should be possible for a people to say “We would like our autonomy” and expect other nations to say in response, “Understood, and we will ally with you to defend such a notion.”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    It should be possible for a people to say “We would like our autonomy” and expect other nations to say in response, “Understood, and we will ally with you to defend such a notion.”

    It should. But then again, the people of Gaza wanted to not be genocided and the world stood by and let it happen. While I fully agree with your sentiment, the specifics of the world right now might require a less than ideal approach.

    Europe should say that, of course. But their weak talk so far suggests they probably won’t defend Greenlanders even if they are a part of Denmark; and if so if Greenland were independent at the moment there’s no reason to think that would somehow give them more of a spine.

    I understand and agree with the sentiment that Greenland is a colonized place that should be independent. I also understand that telling colonized people “not right now” and “it’s too dangerous” are the lines the colonizers always use. But that might actually be the case in this moment. The reality is that the US/Israel axis is acting as if the world is theirs. It feels like we really are in 1939, only the US/Israel axis has far more relative power than the Germany/Italy axis ever did.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -5 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    I get extrapolating an analogy to extremes to make a point. But there is a vast gulf of difference between declaring one’s house within a sovereign state another sovereign state and expecting others to come to your aid, and a large, otherwise uninhabited tract of land, rich with precious metals requesting sovereignty upon that land with the aid of allies with which they can trade.

    Don’t be silly.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-2 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [+] -11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    So i wonder why there's an US army base in greenland?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments