Already spent five years in prison. 😨
post
“As has been the case for decades, nearly all the cases alleged that the pregnant person used a substance during pregnancy,” the report adds. “In 268 cases, substance use was the only allegation made against the pregnant person.
We don't know what these substances were or how far along in pregnancy these people were. Combined with strict anti-abortion laws, this is such a trap. I got an abortion a few years ago. In part it was because I'm way too poor to afford a child, but it was also in part because I was taking prescribed medications that would've been counter-indicated for a pregnancy. The medication I was taking would've been particularly harmful in the first trimester, and had I been trying to get pregnant, I would've avoided it. However, things can happen even with contraception.
Thankfully I'm not in a backwards state, but if I had been, would I have been stuck in this trap? Unable to abort, but also taking "substances" that would've been harmful to a fetus, there's no way around it except to say that anyone of child-bearing ability isn't allowed to take such medications or use "substances" at all. For all we know someone could've been casually drinking in the first trimester, without even knowing they were pregnant yet, and now they're jailed because they dared to live a normal, adult life. The only reason I found out about mine was because I coincidentally got an illness within the first few weeks and the doctor offered a pregnancy test. It was so early, I hadn't even missed a period yet. With dysregulated cycles (sometimes due to conditions outside of a person's control), one could go quite a while without being aware of a pregnancy, carrying on life as normal.
It's so clear the law-makers think of us as merely vessels for child-bearing, with no other life or purpose. We must be pure and perfect, and ready to take on a pregnancy whenever it may happen, regardless of our lifestyles. I feel for this woman and all the others stuck in this situation, keenly aware that if I were to simply move a few hundred miles away, I could be in their shoes.
It doesn't help that most medicines are not designed to be quit cold-turkey. Someone in your scenario who wants to have a child (despite not planning for it) could still be risking their child in the process of getting off such a medication. That's not even considering the impact of being off said medication.
What a mess.
Like half the SSRIs, anything to treat ADHD and benzodiazepines. All of those would not be fun to go off of.
I was on an SSRI and then my insurance said they actually don't need to cover my mental health and meds. I didn't have the energy to keep appealing the decision (hence the need for meds) so I gave up.
I tried to wean myself off with the remaining supply I had, because that is what the doctors teach you to do when they take you off an SSRI. I only knew this because the previous did nothing good for me. It was guesswork, it was unpleasant, and I highly recommend avoiding this situation if possible. The withdrawal sucks and the effects lasted a few months.
Imagining doing that while pregnant makes my stomach turn.
Which SSRI? Some are vastly more painful to discontinue than others.
Escitalopram (Lexapro), so somewhere in the middle of the pain-to-cold-turkey pack.
[TMI maybe] Awful experience, but worse than the pain was that my libido vanished for a little over half a year after quitting. On the medication, it still somewhat existed. My partner was not happy, understandably.
I have professional (UK) experience, but not sighted on the evidence or debates in this case or on US law. Firstly: Medical examination appears clear as to the question, did the meth cause death. Cannot say it did is a scientific / medical point. This means possibly, but there is sufficient doubt that it did here. Secondly: placental infection was clearly present. Nothing at all is reported as to how the use of meth could lead to that infection.
Placental infection could be viral or bacterial. No indication which. Immune weaknesses can lead to higher risk of infections. Meth could create some immune weakness, but you only see that with longer term / higher dose use. Again, not a specific cause that we could say is the cause.
Unless there is evidence that we don't see, there is absolutely no way to acheive a balance of probabilities level of evidence, let alone the required level of "beyond all reasonable doubt".
It seems that beleifs and words led to this womans conviction rather than facts.
Wait so how does a coroner not have medical training? It's just some guy cutting dead people open?
I recently moved to GA and the coroner was one of the hottest local elections since moving here. No idea if he has any medical training.
Edit: just looked the guy up, he ran a funeral home for some time. Mortuary science degree.
What’s the worst that can happen? You can’t kill them even more, right?
Well, how can they determine cause of death if they have no medical training? Like in the case in this article they put something else as cause for the stillbirth instead of the placenta infection the medical examiner found.
TV shows often portray coroners as forensic medical examiners, but those are different jobs in practice. A coroner is really just the person in charge of handling dead people for a region. Declaring them dead, arranging for transport to next of kin, and sometimes handing them over to a medical examiner if things are suspicious. Each area will typically have a single elected or appointed coroner who will hire or contract medical examiners and other staff as needed.
I look forward to seeing all the people who think that they should be able to speed excessively in vehicles on public roads with no issue coming to the defense of prosecuting this woman for doing an illegal act which was not confirmed to have any effect on the stillbirth.
I'm reading American Nations right now, and part of me does wonder about forming some additional country or a situation like Puerto Rico where they have no real representation. Carve off the very shittiest area of the country, with few or no resources we'd want, let them form their own thing, and call it Jesustan.
Let all the mouthbreathing conspiracy theorists and most especially all the snake-handling dipshits move there. Give time and assistance for any reasonable people in the new Jesusland territory to move to real America.
For those that remain that are still conservatives/Republicans: let them know we are not going to have any of their more extremist nonsense here, reiterate that this is a secular nation, and if they don't like real freedom, including the freedom FROM religion, they have the option to move to Jesustan.
I imagine that Jesustan would not end up much different than The Christian States of America as depicted in Rapture of the Nerds...
Im sure ill be down voted:
A 25 week old fetus has a 82.5% survive rate with medical intervention. (https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/154/4/e2024065963/199459/Survival-of-Infants-Born-at-22-to-25-Weeks?autologincheck=redirected)
If the fetus was born at term a popped positive for drugs the mother would have been arrested for child endangerment and the child in foster care ( which no kid deserves.)
Medical advances now allow for brain surgery in the womb.
White men once thought black men were less than human. That women and children were property. Some still do.
Now I'm not for going after women for stillbirths, and in this case the medical examiner could not determine that the drugs caused death, leading to reasonable doubt. She should have been not guilty.
Fetus should have a right to life. But women also have right to body integrity. Rights should be carefully enshrined into law. With the change should include right to contraception and elective sterilization (non forced) with anesthesia and medical care.
Why should a fetus have a right to life? It is not a person, it is not even its own being yet. I think that, given the number of children who are born and do not have sufficient care, we should not be contributing to that problem.
Because genetically it is an individual and @ 25 weeks it both can feel pain and has a high chance of survival in the nicu. And yes many children need better care. But they are two problems and we should be tackling both. Teaching our children how to become decent parents at the same time as improving our social safety nets for all.
Women should have bodily autonomy which includes the right to not proceed with a pregnancy no matter how likely the child is to survive to pregnancy.
Let's grant the fetus personhood.
It doesn't change my mind.
No person has a right to parasitically feed on another human host or tear its way out of their body. Abortion is self defense.
A 6 month old is still "parasitic" to its mother.
Now medically we have formula to substitute. We also have the nicu for children past 20 weeksandl we have artificial wombs for large mammals. Those could be easily developed to be human artificial wombs but of coarse that requires human testing which is immoral apparently. Even though having such wombs would mean the "my body, my choice" argument would no longer be viable and meaning that countless embryos frozen would have a pathway to life without being "parasitic."
A 6 month old can be moved to a different caretaker, fairly easily.
A fetus has to either be delivered or literally carved out of the host's body, and no one has a right to use anyone's body that way. Besides, if there were artificial wombs we'd probably simply end regular human pregnancy anyway.
a stillbirth isnt viable at all, and its the womens choice to terminate or not, not you or anyone else.
IMO… There is no such thing as god, or a soul. When we die nothing happens. The value of the woman’s life is exponentially more valuable than a bunch of cells still forming.
So, if a growth in a woman poses a health risk—and all pregnancies are health risks—the women should be able to decide not to have this health risk. The farther along it gets, the more risky the removal procedure becomes, and at a certain point it’s just induced labor.
The tricky part is what happens later. Who is responsible for it? Who is responsible for defects from “keeping it alive?” Who pays the child emotional and physical damages for its lifetime because it was kept alive due to medical intervention?
There’s a really cool position in Philosophy of Mind called Hylemorphic Dualism, which actually preserves (makes sense of) our intuitions about “souls” without breaking physics.
My intuition about souls is that they're nonsense.
It was silly to bring up Philosophy of Mind when there are intellectual powerhouses like you around here equipped with gut feelings.
I just have no interest in being polite, permissive, or accepting of pseudoscience.
Did you just compare actual living sapient people with thoughts and feelings to an unconscious, unborn fetus?
Maybe you have a lot in common with a fetus. I don’t.
A 25 week old fetus feels pain (https://www.acog.org/advocacy/facts-are-important/gestational-development-capacity-for-pain) prolife orgs will actually say earlier, evidence by fetus' trying to move away from instruments tearing them apart during an abortion.
Scientifically speaking the brain doesnt reach maturity until around the age 23. A 13 year old while conscience doesn't have the same conscience as a 23 year.A 3 year may be conscious, but I know wasn't until around the age of 4. A 3 month old doesn't have the same development and can't even see color. At what point do you grant personhood and what justification do you have to deny others before that age?
At one point it wasn't until adulthood. Progressively we have given more rights to others like nonwhites, women, and children as our society/species matures. We now even grant animals limited rights. I'm suggesting extending basic rights to any and all fetus' that can survive outside the womb and to push medically to extend that age to as low as possible.
Im sure ill be down voted:
A 25 week old fetus has a 82.5% survive rate with medical intervention. (https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/154/4/e2024065963/199459/Survival-of-Infants-Born-at-22-to-25-Weeks?autologincheck=redirected)
If the fetus was born at term a popped positive for drugs the mother would have been arrested for child endangerment and the child in foster care ( which no kid deserves.)
Medical advances now allow for brain surgery in the womb.
White men once thought black men were less than human. That women and children were property. Some still do.
Now I'm not for going after women for stillbirths, and in this case the medical examiner could not determine that the drugs caused death, leading to reasonable doubt. She should have been not guilty.
Fetus should have a right to life. But women also have right to body integrity. Rights should be carefully enshrined into law. With the change should include right to contraception and elective sterilization (non forced) with anesthesia and medical care.
Same argument as “I’m not racist, BUT…”
Stop trying to pretend you’re “moderate” on this in any way. If you don’t support women’s bodily autonomy then what you’re saying is that they’re cattle that can make babies. It’s as simple as that
1 comment