all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

as much as i love seeing a company embracing risc-v... why did it have to be qualcomm? they'll just turn it into their own proprietary crap just so they can save money on the arm licenses

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Can they? I thought it was an open ISA without a pushover license like MIT.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    i was thinking of it more in the way of how ARM came to be. they took RISC, built upon and extended it, with the end result being proprietary processors which weren't RISC anymore.

    i strongly doubt that anything qualcomm will create would contribute to the risc-v ecosystem at a whole. on the other hand, maybe it's an important step for it's mass adoption. time will tell

  • source
  • parent
  • 2 comments in c/riscv@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    I was waiting for this news. Let the games begin.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    The day ARM announced their lawsuit against Qualcomm, I said that Qualcomm would switch to RISC-V on the high-end and I still expect them to do so.

    Who wants to invest in home grown chip tech just to be told by ARM that they do not like your strategy or that they are not monetizing it enough? RISC-V offers total control over your tech investment strategy.

    Qualcomm has not built out the ecosystem in that market yet. They can switch. And longer term, RISC-V is the clear market leader anyway. It will be the better developed ecosystem.

    I would expect Snapdragon to stay ARM, but a new RISC-V family can grow beside it.

    Apple is too heavily invested in ARM to switch. But most others designing and deploying their own silicon to desktop or server would be better off without ARM.

    And RISC-V is already killing it in microcontrollers, automotive, and healthcare.

    The place ARM is most entrenched is mobile. That is going to take longer. But if you look at ARMs licensing business model there, there will be a dozen RISC-V players playing the same game against them. That makes it very hard for ARM in the long run. It will be hard to outrun them all.

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/business@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 0 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Sounds like a death knell for RISC-V.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 3 points 10 months ago

    Thankfully Qualcomm can't "buy out RISC-V". I think the current size of the ecosystem and competitive dynamics are such they can't kill RISC-V even in an in-direct manner.

    That being said, I haven't really seen anything all too impressive on the RISC-V front.

    I would be willing to switch my SBC to RISC-V as I only run open source applications on Linux and I don't even need transcoding.

  • source
  • parent