Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released a batch of 68 photos obtained from the estate of Jeffrey Epstein on Thursday, one day before the deadline for the Trump administration to release a much larger group of Epstein files.

The photos come from a trove of 95,000 images the committee received last week, the Democrats said. The release includes images of lines from the novel "Lolita" written on a person's body; various travel documents; a screenshot of text messages about an 18-year-old from Russia and more. The photos can be accessed here.

The Democrats released several dozen photos last week, showing various high-profile figures including President Trump, former President Bill Clinton, Woody Allen, Gates and others. Neither batch of photos implicates any of those pictured in Epstein's crimes.

top 85 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 86 points 10 months ago (11 children)

oh look David Blaine does magic for rapist pedophiles.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    What is it with magicians and Epstein, there's also David Copperfield

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    It is important to remember that simply being in a photo with Epstein isn't evidence they were a part of what was happening or knew about it. Being at the same generic rich person party as Epstein isn't damning by itself.

    Epstein traveled in elite circles and obviously wanted to flaunt that access as much as possible. He was everywhere the money was, he worked in Finance for decades.

    Likewise, almost surely not all visits to his Island were related to his sexual trafficking business.

    Context is important, and that's why actual investigations into all of these connections are important as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 10 months ago* (3 children)

    If you lie with dogs then you will get fleas

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 10 months ago

    So you assume that every dog in existence has fleas? Can't be around any dogs whatsoever at any point for fear of getting fleas? Shitty analogy for the situation.

    Better hope none of your old friends from say high school or college that you haven't seen for years end up being sexual predators at any point in time. Might have photos taken with them that others will see and assume you knew what was going on because you were with them. Especially if they were doing that at the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    And because people like those in the pictures will block any real investigation, to me, it's guilty until proven innocent

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 74 points 10 months ago (25 children)
  • [–] 48 points 10 months ago (11 children)

    Yeah, they said that in the antitrust trial in the 90s. It was horseshit then and it's horseshit now.

    Billionaires never see justice for the same reason no one has ever seen the easter bunny. Justice doesn't exist. Just a legal system designed to punish the poor and minorities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    billionaires never see justice

    It’s because they have successfully convinced the majority of this country that having money makes you a better person.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    or that at that level, they can influence local, state and some national politics in a way the common man just can't touch; purchasing the people in the roles for "law enforcement" there's just no one that can do it.

    it feels incompatible with democracy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Bernie Madoff, Elizabeth Holmes. It's rare but it does happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    And all you have to do is defraud the billionaire pedo class.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    That's not what Madoff did, but ok. We'll lie so you can be pretend like exceptions don't exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago*

    It's part of what he did, and it's the sole reason that he's the only rich person who saw any consequences from the subprime mortgage catastrophe.

    Now is there any other rich criminal you want to make excuses for because you're unwilling to admit that capitalism is less than absolutely perfect in every conceivable way?

    So far you've gone to bat for Madoff and Gates.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah, they said that in the antitrust trial in the 90s.

    How could anyone possible equate these things? All that happens in antitrust is your business is split up. This is a whole other thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    His guilt was just as obvious and his money shielded him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    The girl's hands in the picture with Bill Gates gives me the worst feeling, they look anxious, I don't know why, they just do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    As a male, I don't understand how can you fuck a person who doesn't want it, who feels uncomfortable around you, let alone is underage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago

    Rape is rearly about sexual gratification. We know the pm from Israel gets off on rape. This is another reason why I oppose un-needed wealth. After a point they almost without fail become monsters.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    it explains why he switched to reinventing his image with "philantrophy" decades ago, and how some of it has been disengenious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 10 months ago* (13 children)

    What does the foot say?

    Edit:

    The release includes images of lines from the novel "Lolita" written on a person's body.

    Great.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    Seems to be the beginning of the second paragraph of the book..:

    She was Lo, plain Lo, in the morning, standing four feet ten in one sock.

    Which in the book continues with..;

    She was Lola in slacks. She was Dolly at school. She was Dolores on the dotted line. But in my arms she was always Lolita.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Which suggests Epstein never actually read the novel to completion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)

    Apparently the POS even had an annotated version and still didn't understand the book!

    Edit: The annotated version, the one that he had, is very informative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    I've read the novel. Humbert is a pathetic old man who destroys Lolita's life for a fling on the road. The girl goes from a charmed upper middle class life before the family meets Humbert to the death of her mother, debasement and abuse at the hands of Humbert, and finally poverty, poor education, and bearing children out of wedlock. Lolita's life is ruined in the aftermath, much like Epstein's real victims. Nabokov did not write a sympathetic treatment of child abuse in Lolita, nor is Humbert a hero in the story.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    That novel is so beautifully written that I wish it was about something completely different so I don't feel dirty while reading it.

    English wasn't even Nabokov's first language! That's insane!

    The line immediately preceding this one is beautiful:

    Lolita, light of my life, fire of my loins. My sin, my soul. Lo-lee-ta: the tip of the tongue taking a trip of three steps down the palate to tap, at three, on the teeth. Lo. Lee. Ta.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    I don't know what that means. Shed some light?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    Lolita is an (in)famous novel about a man's obsessive sexual attraction to a prepubescent girl. It's supposedly well written, but the content is abhorrent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 10 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 41 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Chomsky said that, at the time of his meetings with Epstein, "what was known about Jeffrey Epstein was that he had been convicted of a crime and had served his sentence. According to U.S. laws and norms, that yields a clean slate."

    that kinda says all it needs to right there

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    According to U.S. laws and norms, that yields a clean slate.”

    Ha. Try getting a job with a felony on your record, asshole.

    He's pretending to not know anything because he doesn't want to "commit suicide" in prison if the billionaire pedos think he's gonna testify against them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I feel vindicated. I'm a little antifa leftist slut and Chompsky still triggered my creep detector.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Some really creepy pics in there 👀

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    Anyone have any idea what all those formulas on the blackboard are all about?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 10 months ago*

    Top one looks like it's from an intermediate level quantum mechanics lecture. Less sure about the bottom one as it's generally less legible but it looks like it's dealing with probability density functions of some kind to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    The top looks like an explanation of the Higgs mechanism, the bottom has very low quality.

    Should probably run the faces via pimeyes and find the papers by these clowns.

    Edit: Mikhail Gromov is his name

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    Oh those are very bad

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    What we'll never see are the mountains of covert surveillance that was seized as evidence.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    But I thought there was only bad people in the files.

    At least fascism is finally comer to an end. This is it ridge? The files that tend Trump or whatever. The definitely not a distraction files.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago*

    No not these pictures. Where is the one with selections from Art of the Deal written on a baby's ass?

    Great work democrats!

  • source
  • [+] -11 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    … why are we still fixated on this? We know what happened. There will continue to be no accountability on the ruling class. How about we focus on the present problems?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Because the alternative is nihilism and chronic apathy and depression.

    Because doing something is better than rolling over and crying "woe is me"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    I think it’s important to discern where the focus is/where time and energy is best suited for. Just doing “something” lacks direction and therefore lacks foresight. Throwing stuff at the wall hoping that it’ll stick isn’t a great approach.

    What has come of it? The files were “released” yesterday that were 90% blacked out, some photos are labeled incorrectly (ie: Michael Jackson and Clinton). I was expecting this outcome and the d’s reaction is to threaten impeachment, I was also expecting this outcome. This all is theater. So what is the point?

  • source
  • parent