all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 11 months ago

They deserve long prison time at least. But hey, who am I kidding, right.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    SF6 emissions are bad news, but thanks for reporting it. Wondering whether Solvay HQ in belgium had any role in covering this up ?
    I recall using SF6 30 years ago to study ocean gas fluxes, but only microlitres, as we knew about it’s crazy high GWP even then.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago*

    Solvay's factory reported only 56 kilograms of SF₆ emissions for 2023 to Germany's industrial emissions register. The scientist's estimates are 500 times higher: around 30 tons. Its effect on the atmosphere is more than that of 700,000 tons of CO₂ due to the high global warming potential of SF₆, comparable to a coal-fired power plant.

    So, in terms of how much they probably lied: really bad.

    In terms of whether this one factory could significantly screw up climate: not as bad. Footprint is roughly the size of a large coal-burning plant going at full load.

    They obviously have to fix their leaks + pay for their emissions + pay a large fine + show their internal documents to make it clear if this was intended.

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/climate_lm@slrpnk.net view that post
    [–] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    The Ministry also said that it is legally not possible to order a shutdown of the production facility. German law allows revoking the permit for a facility only if there is an immediate risk to human health or a significant immediate risk to the environment. While there is little doubt that greenhouse gases like SF₆ pose risks to the environment and human health, those are long-term.

    This is why we're all gonna die

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment