On Monday 8 December, the US Southern Command tweeted an announcement that the US military was deploying forces to its area of responsibility. However, one particular design element of the tweet’s image was particularly noticeable:

U.S. military forces are deployed to the #SOUTHCOM area of responsibility in support of #OpSouthernSpear, @DeptofWar-directed operations, and @POTUS' priorities to disrupt illicit drug trafficking and protect the homeland. pic.twitter.com/vLvg9fQ5Lx

— U.S. Southern Command (@Southcom) December 8, 2025

The soldier in the image is depicted wearing a Jerusalem cross on their helmet. That’s the badge there with the cross-and-four-crosses design. Whilst it’s still used today as a Christian symbol, that’s not what’s going on here. Rather, it’s found a secondary meaning in modern times: it’s a dogwhistle symbol of white supremacy.

US military — Jerusalem cross

First up, a bit of background on the Jerusalem Cross. It usually includes a central cross potent, which is made up of two lines of equal length with crossbars at the ends. Then, in each quadrant of the cross potent, there’s a smaller Greek cross (a plus sign).

The four smaller crosses are often interpreted as being symbolic of the four evangelists, or else the four corners of the world. In either case, it has close ties to evangelism (the idea of spreading a Christian message) as a concept.

Immediately after the first crusade (1096-99) the Kingdom of Jerusalem adopted the Jerusalem cross as its coat of arms. Christian pilgrims who visited the holy land often wore the symbol as a sign of devotion. Some even had the Jerusalem cross tattooed on their bodies — most famously king Edward VII in 1862.

Today, the Jerusalem Cross forms the basis of the flag of Georgia. The Catholic Order of the Holy Sepulchure still use it as their main symbol, as does the Catholic church in Jerusalem itself, along with several other Christian groups.

Adoption by white supremacists

Because of the connotations of the Jerusalem cross as a symbol of Christian invasion of Muslim lands, and of Christian evangelism, the symbol has gained popularity with white supremacists in recent years.

Often, white supremacists will use it alongside the phrase “Deus vult”, Latin for “God wills it”. The crusaders also used this phrase as an expression of their belief that God wanted them to conquer Jerusalem.

As the BBC explained, the Jerusalem cross and other crusader iconography has seen widespread adoption by white supremacists and Islamophobes:

When a white supremacist shot dead 50 people in mosques in Christchurch in New Zealand in March last year, his so-called manifesto was reported to include references to the Crusades.

Banners depicting the Jerusalem Cross, along with the term “Deus vult” (God wills it) that was associated with the Crusaders, were deployed by the far-right during a violent rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017. […]

Last week, the US president’s son, Donald Trump Jr, defended posting a photo of himself holding a rifle (known as a “Crusader”) that featured a Jerusalem Cross – as well as an image of Hillary Clinton in jail.

Military propaganda

The Southern Command oversees US military activities in South America and the Caribbean. Its tweet announced the mobilisation of military forces to assist with Operation Southern Spear. This is the name of the Trump administration’s attacks on Venezuelan sea vessels that it claims — without evidence — are drug boats. 

The strikes on Venezuelan vessels are illegal under international law. Worse still, the Trump admin has also threatened land-based strikes and bombing runs on Venezuelan soil.

The US has also declared several South American drug-smuggling gangs as terrorist organisations in order to justify the use of military force against them. One of those gangs is the cartel de los soles — likely does not exist — which the US claims is run by Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and some of his top generals.

Trump wills it

Now, as it gears up for what amounts to a war with Venezuela, the US is putting white supremascist symbols on its military propaganda.

The USA is, quite famously, not a Christian group. It is not using the Jerusalem cross as a Christian symbol.

Rather, it is quite openly using it as a crusading symbol — a symbol of a white nation invading and conquering a brown nation. Sure, Venezuela is a majority-Catholic nation. But then, white supremacists have never particularly been known for their understanding of history.

Unless they are referring to the Fourth crusade?

The fact that the US military is using the Jerusalem cross in its propaganda is yet another example of saying the quiet part out loud. The Trump regime is a white-supremacist regime. Its war on Venezuela is not, and never has been, about drugs.

Instead, the war on Venezuela is about demonstrating that the US can and will manufacture any reason it can to inflict its aggression on any (brown) state it sees fit. The one and only reason, as for so much US policy, is that Trump wills it.

Featured image via Twitter

By Alex/Rose Cocker


From Canary via This RSS Feed.

all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 11 months ago

Same reason Hegseth has one as a tattoo.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    The image in question, just so no one actually has to go to twitter.

  • source
  • 55 comments in c/world view that post
    [–] 29 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Oh shit! The Nazi army is doing Nazi shit? I'm not sure I buy it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    The same one on Hegseth's boob?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (11 children)

    “American citizens allow their military to use white supremacist Jerusalem cross on its propaganda”

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (10 children)

    oh no! i allowed them! it’s all my fault!
    here let me just go stop the us military from running that twitter ad….
    …
    well shit, turns out they’ll just arrest me for that or shoot me as soon as i get within a mile of wherever they’re tweeting from.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (9 children)

    Better just roll over and take it then, eh? Coward.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    When has the American public, or any country, had any say regarding the uniform in the military? Go ahead, us cowards will wait.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

    Revolutionary France. Civilians used community policing (backed by the threat of force) to force changes to the army uniform. There were activists in revolutionary cities openly confronting troops, checking their uniforms, and in some cases escalating to violence if soldiers didn’t display rhe blue/white/red cockade. Thy distributed pamphlets persuading people that wearing the revolutionary colors was a shorthand for allyship and after not too long the army basically had to adopt it as official or expect their troops to be harassed at best or attacked in the street at worst (Schama, 1989).

    Other examples- civilian pressure successfully forcing the Iranian military to replace monarchist uniform insignia with Islamic iconography after the Shah fell in 1979, Chinese citizens physically attacking soldiers for displaying traditional insignia rather than (later-officially-adopted) Maoist symbols in the 1960s, civilian nationalist groups in Ghana forcing a redesign of military uniforms to remove British colonial styling….

    Now move the goal posts. Do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    I don't have to. You sourced two very un-American militaries. But thanks for the information.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    chatgpt do all your writing for you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago*

    I think it is very weird to have that tattooed or on any military gear. Secularism and such, but that is the heraldry of the former Kingdom of Jerusalem. Albeit being the result of crusades, I don't think it is supremacist by itself?

    Edit: Also the flag of the country of Georgia. Going by this, the US military either serves in the Georgian army as of recent or they confused theirs with the country again?

    Edit#2: Quick wikipedia, also apparently still the symbol of the Latin patriarchate of Jerusalem nowadays

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago

    It's literally tattooed on Hegseth. Are you at all surprised?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (12 children)

    Adoption by white supremacists

    Because of the connotations of the Jerusalem cross as a symbol of Christian invasion of Muslim lands, and of Christian evangelism, the symbol has gained popularity with white supremacists in recent years.

    ok it’s whack to use religious symbols in military ads but just because it “gained popularity” with white supremacists doesn’t make it a white supremacist symbol.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    Lol yeah just a run of the mill religious symbol...

    You literally just said yourself that it was used while Christians genocided Muslims.

    Even if it hadn't been adopted by white supremacists (it has), it would still be abhorrent.

    You know that the swastika was a Hindu symbol before the Nazis adopted it, right? Is the swastika not a Nazi symbol?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    Even if it hadn't been adopted by white supremacists (it has), it would still be abhorrent.

    yes, it is abhorrent… it’s not, however, a white supremacist symbol.
    “crusader” is a terrible term for the military to associate itself with… but definitely not as terrible as a white supremacist symbol.
    white supremacists have also “adopted” wearing boots but i’m not going to call everyone wearing boots a white supremacist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    So is the swastika a Nazi symbol or not?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    well yes and no.
    it was obviously their official symbol and on their flags, buttons, and everything else.
    But it was also ripped off and meant different things to different cultures for thousands of years.
    but to answer the loaded part of your question:
    Some white supremacist’s use of the crusader cross is not at all like the nazi’s use of the swastika

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Oh, so how many need to use it until it does become a symbol of white supremacy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago*

    Well you'd at least need it to be tattooed onto the chest of the second in command of the worlds largest armed forces in the world, in a country that's rapidly pivoted towards white Christian nationalism.

    So it's safe to say this isn't about white supremacy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    where are you located? in my part of the world, in my corner of america, that is the white supremacist symbol. you don't often see people with it, but when you do it is a tattoo or morale patch on someone wearing other hate symbols. i assumed it was widely understood to be a white supremacist symbol in any context aside from displaying pride in Georgian national identity, so i'm learning new things today.

    i still think though we can safely assume that for the people putting out this propaganda that who they're speaking to and for is racists

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    in America, that’s not a very common symbol…
    we don’t actually see a lot of white supremacists on the street though (they would get murked)

    quite a few christian nationalists have adopted other crusader symbolism so i see it as a horrible, christian nationalist, invader/colonizer symbol… but i’ve never seen it associated with white supremacism…

    my argument isn’t that it’s never used by white supremacists, it’s that it’s not an outright white supremacist symbol.
    i’d call it a dog whistle, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    The irony of "Jerusalem" meaning "vision of peace"...

  • source
  • [+] -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (20 children)
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    The ADL is a ZioNazi hate org, no upstanding member of society should ever care what they say.

    https://www.jewishvoiceforpeace.org/2025/01/22/adl-defends-nazi-salutes/

    Likewise this is the same government hell bent on Israel slaughtering in the Middle East so they can have their rapture or whatever. There is no doubt this is related to white supremacism/Christian nationalism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (10 children)

    I agree, though I am of the opinion that in secular states (at least at home and in peace time) government officials (including the army) should not wear any religious iconography

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 11 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago* (8 children)

    I would say ideally not as they represent the state and thus should not wear iconography of any sort for secular states.

    I also know that this might not be exactly practial in reality

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    for a lot of people that is asking them to renounce their religious beliefs in service of the national interest

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Yes I see that problem and in the best case it would not be renouncing their beliefs not to wear something where it is not appropriate, but there are many other beliefs or reasons where one is excluded from official office/army, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    I think you are correct as it is now. And I do agree, as it is right now it is not practical to be completely secular for people holding these offices.

    However, ideally, these groups would not need the recognition in this way as they ought to already have it otherwise and understanding that at some places some things are limited, should not discourage them to believe in what they want.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    First, fuck the ADL. They are so pro-fascism their own logo is now a hate-symbol. Second, the Jerusalem cross on dozens of buildings doesn't sounds like a very significant Christian symbol. It's very contextual. Third, you clearly haven't looked very hard. Fourth, your conclusion is... really stupid. Stop being such a snowflake.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)