On a related note, literally everything Kushner does raises ethical questions.

rich people should be constantly terrified to go out in public.

I am beyond tired of seeing “raises ethical concerns” every time something blatantly corrupt happens. I understand Reuters and AP want to sound neutral, but at this point that phrasing just feels like polite fiction. When the president’s son-in-law is financing a $108 billion media takeover that the president himself may influence through antitrust review, that is not a vague “ethical concern.” That is a direct, structural conflict of interest in plain sight. The soft language does not make it responsible journalism anymore. It makes it feel like reality is being systematically understated.

Ethics? What are those?

We're cool with the authoritarian backers though? Should be concerning when countries that treat women like property want to control who's your funding your media.

I worry Paramount will ruin the DCU and turn it into right wing propaganda

Anyone expecting ethics out of this regime has got to be kidding themselves.

It's a crime family, no one is supposto ask questions. What kind of shoes you like? Concrete?

Los Angeles nepo baby ask help from New York nepo baby. They are both close to the White House nepo baby, and ask for money from middle east nepo babies. Ah, meritocracy!