In his initial announcement, Starmer stated: “You will not be able to work in the United Kingdom if you do not have digital ID. It's as simple as that.” Since then, the government has been forced to clarify those remarks: digital ID will be mandatory to prove the right to work, and will only take effect after the scheme's proposed introduction in 2028, rather than retrospectively.

The government has also confirmed that digital ID will not be required for pensioners, students, and those not seeking employment, and will also not be mandatory for accessing medical services, such as visiting hospitals. But as civil society organizations are warning, it's possible that the required use of digital ID will not end here. Once this data is collected and stored, it provides a multitude of opportunities for government agencies to expand the scenarios where they demand that you prove your identity before entering physical and digital spaces or accessing goods and services.

all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

Because they're lying.

The cruelty is the point.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Starmer leadership challenge when

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    I always find it interesting how little the English speaking world knows about countries that aren't English speaking. I don't think people realise they're in a media bubble.

    In this case, there are plenty of countries that have introduced digital ID, but you likely wouldn't know much about that if you consume only English language media. Predictably this article deals with hypotheticals or something that happened in another English speaking country, rather than mentioning what happened in countries with actual digital ID.

    It reminds me of this British show I was watching about where they were building a house near the Thames. The builders and architect spent much of the time, fellating each other for inventing sub-optimal solutions for problems which have already been solved. So much time and money wasted because they refused to use google translate or email a Dutch architect. Unlike the Italians, the perfidious Dutch do actually speak English.

    You could blame the language barrier, but in large part it's chauvinism. Unfortunately, pride often becomes before the fall. Such a wasted opportunity to not learn from mistakes made.

  • source