all 32 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 44 points 11 months ago (1 child)

Key point:

We humbly ask if you, reader, are currently donating through GitHub Sponsors, that you consider moving your recurring donation to Every.org, which is itself a non-profit organization.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    I won't ever write zig but respect to the maintainers for moving to codeberg and sticking to their principles. If the nixos foundation had any, they would move too (but I guess fighting in the forums is more fun than moving).

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    im not sure codeberg currently had the infrastructure to support day-to-day operation of nixpkgs development. I'm using codeberg daily for my own projects, and sometimes the diff for MR is broken or load for too long. Not mentioning stability issues.

    Of course I wouldn't complain of something thats maintained by volunteers. I'm just saying the traffic for nixpkgs are currently big and I'm pessimistic codeberg can handle it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (4 children)

    I feel like we should be treating git as more of a federated system. What rule is there against pushing to multiple remotes?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    For git itself sure, but all the other things that come with a git forge, like issue management, are probably things that you don't want spread out over multiple websites

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    We already have activitypub, and projects like Gitea are actively implementing it (at this time I don't think it's live enough yet)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 45 points 11 months ago (12 children)

    Your move, Rust. I'd love to see it happen.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah surprised it hasn’t. Rust Foundation went as far as abandoning their X account a long time ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    They get a lot of compute for cheap/free and their well supported target follow the available github runners.
    While writing this comment I found out that the crater run happens on AWS. It tests all packages on crates.io and most public rust projects on github.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (9 children)

    Why? Microsoft gives them a ton of money for CI and infrastructure. Unless they are having serious technical issues I don't see why they would move to a more expensive and probably less well integrated CI provider.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Putting aside GitHub’s relationship with ICE, […]

    More importantly, Actions is created by monkeys and completely neglected. After the CEO of GitHub said to “embrace AI or get out”, it seems the lackeys at Microsoft took the hint, because GitHub Actions started “vibe-scheduling”; choosing jobs to run seemingly at random. Combined with other bugs and inability to manually intervene, this causes our CI system to get so backed up that not even master branch commits get checked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    It's "relationship with ICE" is that they haven't banned an official US government agency from buying their software. I might not agree with what ICE is doing but I also don't agree with every corporation in the world having to morally police all of their customers for fear of being pilloried by cancel culturists.

    The "created by monkeys" seems to be a minor bug. What system doesn't have those? I've certainly had plenty worse bugs with Gitlab CI.

    "Completely neglected" is complaining about the lack of FreeBSD support!

    I do think GitHub is relatively neglected. There are quite a few big issues they could fix with relatively little effort but they seem to go years with no comment.

    It's not really much better with Gitlab though; the only difference is you see more "a large premium customer is requesting this" comments!

    I doubt Forgejo really have more resources to fix bugs than GitHub or Gitlab.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    … Gitlab though; the only difference is you see more “a large premium customer is requesting this” comments!

    I love those! /s 😄 It can certainly feel like a pattern, specifically for some tickets.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago* (4 children)

    Why?

    To show some backbone. Microsoft was involved in enough abominable things in the last years alone; any one of them is reason enough to boycott them for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I must have missed those abominable things...? You don't mean the ICE stuff?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    maybe they also mean Israel/Gaza or the AI push

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I wouldn't say those are "abominable" either. AI is fine. Microsoft actually cut off Israel's access to Azure...

    They're operating infrastructure. They aren't going to morally vet every single customer. Imagine how many dubious things run on AWS that we never hear about!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    Microsoft actually cut off Israel’s access to Azure…

    After months of pressure and trying to silence internal criticism.

    I had to look it up to make sure "months of" is correct. Wikipedia has the infos https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Microsoft#Israeli_military_support 2023-2025, various employees fired

    “Microsoft actually cut off Israel’s access to Azure” doesn't really cover or adequately represent their behavior regarding this topic.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago

    This is great. Overdue if you consider the values they espouse. Quite feasible for a compiler project to ignore the network effects of Github. Is their Discord usage next :-)

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago* (3 children)

    Btw, anyone has a backup of all the Github projekts? Just in case MS accidentally deletes stuff again.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    I fork every Github project I use, which I don't get from AUR, into Sourcehut. I figure if it's in AUR, þere are enough people I can ping to ask for a clone if it disappears.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I had a pleasant experience moving my project from github to codeberg. CI is nicer in codeberg because of local runners; easy to migrate too

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    local runners

    Does this mean you can iterate on it fast on the local dev machine?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago*

    It will run faster if your local machine is faster than the cloud, but otherwise it's the same. I don't think I tried starting CI from my machine, per se, I would instead point codeberg to my machine, push to codeberg, and codeberg would send the job to my local runner. You probably can do it entirely locally.

    The main benefit for me was that I can run CUDA workflows without needing to pay extra for GPUs. I've not really thought about what happens if you want to deploy to an architecture you don't own. I can't recall what architectures they provide.

    Note this is with woodpecker CI. I think they're migrating to a new CI at some point.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago*

    I was planning to look into Zig for this year's Advent of Code. Haven't really looked at it yet, but I've heard good things about it. Nowadays I mostly write in C# or Python for smaller scripts, so I kind of expect getting back to C-style code might have some friction, but it's about time to refresh my memory. I had a pretty good time with Rust for AoC in the previous years (not that I ever used it for anything else), but I guess it's time to try something else.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago
    11 comments in c/technology@lemmy.zip view that post
    [–] 13 points 11 months ago

    Nice summary on some of githubs issues.

  • source
  • [–] -3 points 11 months ago (9 children)

    They mention they're concerned about not having GitHub's fundraising help, but I didn't see a wallet address to donate to them at.

    There's a dev working on a project I proposed for a Radicle fork with good support for wallet addresses, to replace GitHub while offering better fundraising potential: Project Zymogen

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    They link to their accepted donation methods in the article: https://ziglang.org/zsf/

    No need for cryptocurrency when they accept real money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 11 months ago* (7 children)

    Seems like you're trying to passive aggressively bait me into a fair response on a platform with rules like "respectful communication" that are often doublespeak - red flags for a possibility that the person reacting fairly will be banned, while the person being passive aggressive is rewarded with herd mentality upvotes and dopamine.

    Try this response on nostr, where I can't be banned for responding, if you want to make it look more possible that you may have been replying in good faith and not just to waste my time / attempt to cyberbully me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    Huh? It wasn't bait, it was a simple statement about how they already have plenty of good options for donating. I brought up cryptocurrency because you mentioned it out of nowhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 11 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I've had more than my fair share of unjustifiable bannings (mostly pRedditor mods abusing their power and cozy relationships with admin staff), but I hope I never become as absurdly paranoid as this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

    Weak gaslighting attempt. Trying to gaslight me would generally be sad anywhere, but when you do it here instead of nostr, it's a total waste of time that could have been spent trying to actually seem sincere enough to have more potential impact

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 1 comment in c/zig@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    I’ve not had the time to do a proper sit-down with Zig, despite all the cool things I’ve heard about it; but at least it seems that the team’s got their heads in the right place. Hell yeah.

  • source