You say "apple" to me and I'm #1, glossy skin, insides, all that

And how in the hell does one navigate life, or enjoy a book, if they're not a #1?! Reading a book is like watching a movie. I subconsciously assign actor's faces to characters and watch as the book rolls on.

Yet #5's are not handicapped in the slightest. They're so "normal" that mankind is just now figuring out we're far apart on this thing. Fucking weird.

EDIT: Showed this to my wife and she was somewhat mystified as to what I was asking. Pretty sure she's a 5. I get frustrated as hell when I ask her to describe a thing and she's clueless. "Did the radiator hose pop off, or is it torn and cracked?" "I don't know!"

EDIT2: The first Star Wars book after the movie came out was Splinter in the Mind's Eye. I feel like I got that title. What's it mean to you?

top 88 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 144 points 11 months ago (34 children)
  • [–] 74 points 11 months ago (23 children)

    What the fuck do you mean some people don't have an inner monologue. How do they... Think thoughts? I literally cannot comprehend how they work through thoughts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 92 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I'm convinced lots of people actually don't think

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago

    The proper way humans are supposed to think is with Critical Thinking Skills. It used to be taught in schools, often in English classes. Remember being taught how to write an essay from the General concept to down to the specific point? That was teaching Critical Thinking Skills, learning how to craft a coherent argument.

    Today, many states actively discourage the teaching of Critical Thinking Skills. Republicans in particular hate it. About a decade ago, the Texas Republican Party even included opposition to Critical Thinking Skills in their state platform, claiming that it taught children to defy authority figures. No it doesn't, it just teaches them when those authority figures are trying to exploit them. They actually tried to position Critical Thinking Skills as detrimental to childhood education.

    If you don't develop Critical Thinking Skills, you will substitute orderly thinking with a sort of ad hoc, improvisatory, chaotic thinking, which is easy for someone with a nefarious agenda to tap into and manipulate. Those with good Critical Thinking Skills learn to recognize and resist things like propaganda.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (9 children)

    How the fuck would you function without an inner monologue AND aphantasia...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    I don't know, that's hard to imagine

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (3 children)

    Guards, send this peasant to the dungeons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    That's me. Best way I can describe it is like a word cloud but no text or dialog. A bunch of concepts with varying importance and strength of connections.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)

    Me too. I think in the connections between ideas. Almost like thinking in metaphor. Also OP said they were surprised aphantasia is not a disability, but thinking without senses is way faster, you don't need to think in a straight line, but can just think a clump of thoughts at once.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Probably different for everyone, but I have neither and sometimes feel almost compelled to speak my thoughts out loud. If I don’t speak them they’re just kind of abstract feelings or impressions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    My mom had a stroke that was caught early, and she was this way in the first couple years afterwards. I had to ask her to stop talking to me so I could read a menu, and she was self-aware about it. She was like "I'm sorry. Just tell me. I just have to speak my thoughts into existence these days."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    It’s interesting to hear about someone having a similar experience due to a brain injury. I have always wondered if my inability to internalize thoughts was some kind of developmental thing; if I don’t speak them or write them down then they’re really scattered and sorta incoherent.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    My best guess: sometimes, one idea flows to the next in my head without the words. Usually I "feel" sentences falling into place at least a few words ahead of what I'm saying, at least kind of. But sometimes I just sort of talk, without the inner mo ologue, and it's mildly confusing. Like, who the hell is building the sentences if it's not me? And why does what's coming out of my mouth totally agree with what I would be saying if I could build the words right now?

    Basically, sometimes the place that ACTUALLY assembles the words bypasses the self-awareness layer, and the words just come out.

    I imagine this is somewhat analogous to the people with no inner monologue; there are still thoughts, they just don't take the form of words. Pictures, concepts, or even other things that make less intuitive sense to those of us with inner monologues.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah I'm calling bullshit on this one haha, op is implying some people cannot process word if not spoken or written. That would be so unbelievably disabling you probably couldn't function in society.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    It's not that they don't process words, it's that those without internal monologues may think in concepts, images, or visualized actions rather than using the words those concepts are attached to. As an example, some deaf people if they have an internalized monologue have reported their monologue being visualized sign language, instead of audible speech spoken in their head. There's quite a lot of variability in how someone processes their internal thoughts.

    Some without internal monologues have mentioned that they can vocalize text in their head, but only if done consciously, and they usually find that it would make reading agonizingly slow to do so for them.

    Simon Roper does a couple really excellent videos on this subject, if you'd like to hear a very eloquent first hand experience of someone else's non-monologue internal thoughts.

    Also @absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    This one I find difficult to comprehend.

    My inner monologue is petty much my entire thought process. How does one think and rationalise without one?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (5 children)

    I am a 5 on this scale, and for all other senses. No smell, sound, touch or taste either.

    So yea; it when I say my inner monologue is pretty much my whole thought process.

    It totally blew my mind; when I realized others could see actual images in their heads.

    The no inner monologue thing still boggles me. Considering my point of view; where it is all of my inner self.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (4 children)

    "Picture in your mind"...

    Me, a 5 on the scale, young: Weird turn of phrase, but okay. I have the... idea of an apple.

    Me, still a 5 on the scale but now an adult, in about 2023, learning about aphantasia and that other people were being literal about mind's eye: WHAT.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Yep....me for 40 years; that is just a metaphor to help think about things. Then one day reading about aphantasia....WTF!!!!!people can actually see, it's not just a metaphor.

    But then I had a conversation with my partner; she can combine flavors in her mind and know, pretty accurately, what stuff will taste like; it is one reason she loves cooking.

    People can actually get a song stuck in their heads....again, not a metaphor.

    Mind blown!!!!

    My 7yo can project images from his mind into the world; what the hell. He can "watch" movie when looking at the wall when he is in bed going to sleep; with the sounds and everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I have some level of auditory imagination; I can play back something I've heard a few times, but it's more like a ghost of the thing than feeling like it's hitting my ears somehow.

    The main non-verbal sense I use in my head is spatial. There is a 3d space that I can imagine objects within, rotate around, kind of analyze things about it. There is no visual component to this, yet it feels like it shares the space that the mind's eye could see into.

    I've described the closest thing I have to visual imagination as like many of the things that happen in the brain's processing of images after the eyes: resolving patterns of light into shapes and lines, processing shapes into the sense of a particular recognized object. If I think about a tree, I definitely don't see a tree in any sense. But I do sort of feel like I did just see a tree, just... without any sense of light or feeling like I actually did any seeing, metaphorical or otherwise. All the analysis, none of the pixels.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    I call this the curtain; when I imagine something, like a tree, I can't see the tree. But it is still there; just like it is behind a black curtain, no images from the tree can be seen.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 70 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    Isn't 5 is called Aphantasia ? To be unable to visualize something in the mind?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 38 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Yep! Craziest thing is that we just started looking into this thing in the past 10-20 years. Proof to me that it's no handicap, but if you took my mind's eye away I'd feel crippled.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    It has its benefits. You can talk absolute depravity, like Trump farting so much shit into Ivankas mouth that liquid diarrhea is overflowing from the side of her mouth with chunks of yesterday's pasta bolognese dangling off her chin, and get no mental image of that filth. But you can enjoy that imagery.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 27 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

    It's more of a spectrum with hyper- and a- phantasia being the extremes on each end

    (Prophantasia is considered the ability to project imagined images into your physical field of view)

    If you really want to blow your mind (heh), you should check out SDAM (Severely Deficient Autobiographical Memory), which is thought to be linked to aphantasia

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

    Wow. I didn't know about the term "prophantasia" until now. Probably because I think that visualizing things in our 3d world is a normally developed imagination power of the people who don't have Aphantasia.

    Prophantasia seems like biologically evolved Augmented Reality. Where instead of wearing a piece of AR glass, We're naturally born with this trait.

    I can pull out my palm in front of me and visualize a small cat jumping around. Not for too long because I cannot imagine the random movement a cat does. But, as a still object, visualizing an apple is easy.

    I am more curious to wonder if someone can manually develop Spatial Intelligence without being born with it priorly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Wait you can not only in some sense see a-cat-on-your-hand when imagining that, but also see an imaginary cat on the hand you are actually seeing???

    Do you then not see the stuff behind the cat while you are imaging the cat to be in the way???

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago*

    Imagining a cat on my hand is just for adding easiness.

    I can imagine a cat anywhere. Right now, a tall water bottle is on a table in front of me. I can imagine a cat one the table, walking towards the bottle and ultimately jumps on it. I can also imagine the bottle to shake or fall down as an impact.

    Imagining a still object, for example an apple is more easy. I can imagine the apple has a non scientifical gravity trait and it keeps bouncing on every flat surfaces around the room.

    I've been considering this as normal imagination power for the people who don't have Aphantasia. Probably because I can imagine like this with ease.

    Seeing past the thing that I imagine is kinda a cognitive blindspot. Because, I don't try to look past what I imagine. A cat or an apple.

    Only when I get aware of the fact if I really do look past or not, the confusion arises. But it is much difficult for me to imagine a transparent object. Like an apple made of glass.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 43 points 11 months ago (24 children)

    I'm a #5 on that scale.

    And how in the hell does one navigate life, or enjoy a book, if they’re not a #1?! Reading a book is like watching a movie. I subconsciously assign actor’s faces to characters and watch as the book rolls on.

    I won't say I'm not jealous of people who're #1s. However, to directly answer your question, it's not like our heads are empty. You think apple and (apparently) 'see' an apple. I think apple and it's like thinking of how you'd describe an apple. It's red, it's round. It has a stem. It's juicy. It tastes good... but I can't see it. Or anything else. They're just thoughts.

    I have a very difficult time with facial recognition, presumably as a result of this. If I'm watching a movie where there's a lot of characters that are shown but not named, I have a difficult time following that. I need to be able to assign names to them to keep them straight in my head, and often-times if a character isn't named but they're important, I'll assign them a name myself just to have something to track them with. I can recognize people I interact with a lot obviously but if you asked me to describe what someone looks like who I'm not currently interacting with, that's very difficult for me to do, beyond very surface-level stuff, like their gender or their build. If I had to describe someone for a police sketch, I'd be useless at that. Remembering facial features is like remembering a list of words; I can't just call up an image of them to describe... if I haven't already committed that description to memory, I can't describe the person.

    It's funny, honestly, because I never realized this wasn't how everyone is until I saw the image you linked some years back. I actually called up my mother immediately after and asked her what she could see. The conversation went something like:

    "When you think of an apple, can you see the apple?"

    "Yes..."

    "Yeah, but like... you can actually see it, though?"

    "...yes...?"

    "Yeah but I mean like... you can see it, as if you're looking at it?"

    "...yes, what is this about?"

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 11 months ago* (8 children)

    I had that exact same conversation with my mom but it went like this:

    "Ok mom, picture a cow in your head"

    "Oookayyy"

    "Now you can see a cow right?"

    "What do you mean"

    "Like... You can see a picture of the cow, right?"

    "Nooo"

    My dad chimes in "yes, obviously"

    "...crap. Mom, I have some news for you"

    Both of us grew up thinking we had no imagination or were dumb. I remember being incredibly frustrated when a teacher taught us the concept of the Memory Palace where you picture things in rooms of a house. Like if you had to remember five playing cards you'd picture a room with 7 red clowns, with hearts on their cheeks. Then in the next room you'd picture a king, holding up a spade, etc. That just made it harder for me to remember and the teacher kept telling me I wasn't listening or trying.

    I feel that explanation about being useless to a sketch artist on a spiritual level, that blew my mind as a kid. To this day I can't really describe what my parents or wife looks like, I can just list characteristics. I feel my brain trying to visualize but then it comes up empty

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    I used to want very much to be an artist, or at least, be able to draw capably, but it's always seemed impossible. I can think of what I want to draw in a macro sense - like, if I was thinking of that famous Norman Rockwell painting with the boy with the bindle sitting at the diner next to the police officer, I can certainly imagine the scene. Just thinking of that painting from memory, the officer is looking down at the boy who's looking up at the officer, there's a man behind the counter in a white outfit looking at both of them with an amused expression, there's some pastries or donuts or something on the counter...

    But to draw something, it feels like you've got to be able to imagine the micro details, and without references to look at, I just can't do that. The same is true if I was going to try to describe the minutia in the painting - what color is the officer's hair? Are any of the characters wearing glasses? What do the wrinkles in their clothes look like? What kind of shoes are they wearing?

    I even have a difficult time commissioning artwork as a result of this, because it's difficult to describe what I want without having something visual to reference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I've seen a recommendation for the books ‘Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain’ by Betty Edwards and ‘The Creative License: Giving Yourself Permission to Be The Artist You Truly Are’ by Danny Gregory. The commenter also attached their drawings from before and after, saying it took a quite short time to go from rudimentary scribblings to full-fledged detailed realistic drawings. So perhaps these books help, though I've got a feeling they might be about drawing from references.

    The same is true if I was going to try to describe the minutia in the painting - what color is the officer's hair? Are any of the characters wearing glasses? What do the wrinkles in their clothes look like? What kind of shoes are they wearing?

    I'm not really an artist, but for myself I resolved this problem by making decisions like that when I come around to those details. I.e. I'll choose the fitting shoes when it's time to draw the shoes. And of course, sketching is for planning this kind of stuff before drawing proper begins.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    I’ve seen a recommendation for the books ‘Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain’ by Betty Edwards and ‘The Creative License: Giving Yourself Permission to Be The Artist You Truly Are’ by Danny Gregory.

    I'll give this a look! Thanks for the recommendation!

    I’m not really an artist, but for myself I resolved this problem by making decisions like that when I come around to those details. I.e. I’ll choose the fitting shoes when it’s time to draw the shoes. And of course, sketching is for planning this kind of stuff before drawing proper begins.

    I don't think I'm really explaining the problem well, but like... If I don't have a visual reference, I just can't imagine (or draw) what the minute details actually look like in those situations. An artist might be able to take a side-profile picture of a shoe and visualize what that would look like if it was a front or back or diagonal viewpoint, and draw it into their scene. I know what a shoe looks like... I can describe one, I know a shoe when I see one obviously, but when it comes to needing a level of detail sufficient to actually draw the lines - to know where the next line should go - I come up blank. I can draw something and recognize that it doesn't look like what I want, but it's difficult to actually identify what it is that I do want unless I stumble on it.

    I can draw very low-detail things. Stick figures, say, or basic outlines, but the details come very hard to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    The person who recommended those books said they 'teach how to draw what you see instead of what the brain tells you to draw'. Which is a bit odd, and I don't know if they meant drawing from references specifically, but it kinda sounds like it might help with capturing an object how it should look. Especially since their 'after' example was a detailed drawing of a crow down to the feathers.

    I'm actually simultaneously intrigued and a bit wary of these books, since I prefer unrealistic and quirky style and want to develop one like that for myself, but am afraid I might go for detailed looks if I learn to do that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    What Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain teaches you is to draw how an object does look. I'm probably a 4 on the scale and can draw because of this book. One of the memorable techniques is to take a photograph, turn ti upside down and draw it that way. Then, turn your drawing upside and see what you got. By making the image a bit confusing, you can focus on the lines and shading your eyes see, and not 'a man in a chair' your mind sees.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    I have aphantasia as well but I do actually have something sort of like a memory palace.. kinda. It should be completely useless when I’m awake, but isn’t. I have a dream town, and every place I’ve dreamed about more than three times in the last ~20 years is there in a surprisingly consistent and exceptionally vivid way, like logging into a mmorpg, but spawning in random places. If not for it being easily recognizable as “my town”, I’d struggle to tell it from waking reality because that’s the only other time I experience “sight”. It’s genuinely unsettling sometimes, when my brain makes a new place, to not know if I was dreaming. Maybe that’s why I revisit places until they feel comfortable and familiar and get incorporated into the town.

    I say it isn’t completely useless because I use spacial memory to “go places” when awake. I can’t see it, but I know what’s there if I go there, the same way I can mentally count the windows, and know what’s around them, in my house without visually touring the house; I think about where I go to open windows on a nice day, and count the stops.

    I can’t put things into the town purposely. Locations or objects, unfortunately. Everything has to already be there if I want to make use of it. But if I can find a useful thing on my spacial tour, I can make note of where I found it, or move it to somewhere more useful. Like the finding the windows exercise, but, to continue your example, I happen to recall that next to window 3 is a Christmas cactus with pink heart-shaped flower buds, and I choose to ”move it” it to the 7th window of my tour. (And yes, if I make note that I’ve moved something, it does stay there when I dream, so that’s really neat)

    Genuinely not that useful for things people probably normally use a memory palace sort of thing for, like short-term memories, (finding useful objects is difficult, and sometimes requires a lot of in-dream exploring, which takes actual time) but somewhat useful for certain long-term things, like numbers or recipes. And as a bonus, when I forget something, I’ll often stumble across it in my town and be reminded. Like the recipe for my mom’s cheesecake is the literal ingredients just sitting on the counter in the pocket floor she lives in (she’s a nightmare I had often enough to join the town’s residents, but I shoved her in an impossible floor so I can avoid her). I put that recipe there because I like to modify it, and I often forget what the base recipe is. It’s not written down in the normal sense because I’ll lose it, but it’s simple enough for a representation like that to be easy to hold onto.

    But I’ve had similar frustrating experiences with people telling me to visualize things for whatever reason. Like nope, my internal computer is GUI-free. Text output only, with a screen reader. Not even multiple voices, which I hear is a thing most people can do, just the one default reader voice.

    On the subject of not being able to visualize people, if there’s someone you haven’t seen in a long time, do you falsely match other people up with the description? For example, my mom died when I was 23, and I’m almost 40 now. It’s been so long that I genuinely don’t remember what she looks like unless I’m looking at a photo. But I know her general description, and when I see other women who fit the description I -feel- that they look just like her even though they usually don’t, actually.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    I've been told on Reddit that people with aphantasia can actually do the ‘memory palace’ thing. But, since it was just one commenter who didn't quite describe how it would work, while I myself can visualize but dislike the ‘palace’ technique, I have no further information as to how to do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    I'm basically the opposite. I can remember peoples faces very well but have a hell of a hard time trying to remember their names. I'd say I'm a 1 or 2 on this scale, depending imon if I'm fully engaged with the content (like reading a book).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    So you never have sexual fantasies? If somebody asks you to describe how something looks, how are you able to do it? Can you at least remember the colors red and blue?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago

    I have sexual fantasies, but they're more like reading erotica than watching porn.

    I imagine I describe things just like I expect others do, except that instead of having a catalogue of pictures to reference, I have a filing cabinet of documents with descriptions of those things. The concept of a 'photographic memory' is completely foreign to me. If I'm walking down the street and I see someone get mugged, then I get asked about it later, I can recall and recite the things I specifically took notice of in the moment, but if I want to be able to give a description of e.g. what the person was wearing or what color their hair was, I need to consciously observe those things and commit them to memory at the time. As I understand it, some folks can just recall the event and 'replay' it in their mind, and recall things they might not have taken direct notice of originally; I definitely can't do that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago* (4 children)

    I subconsciously assign actor’s faces to characters and watch as the book rolls on.

    But aren't you visualizing the assigned character's face? I think we all have varying amounts of this depending on what it is. It sounds like you can visualize faces, but not spaces.

    Edit: I see you say further down that you have a difficult time with facial recognition.

    Everyone's brain does such wildly different things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    It sounds like you can visualize faces, but not spaces.

    Can't visualize faces at all; I think you pulled that quote from a different post. ;)

    The thing to remember, though, is that... I didn't even know this was something that I "couldn't do" until it was pointed out to me that others can do it. I just assumed everyone else was being metaphorical when they said they "visualized something" in their head, or whatever. So whereas you hear it and think "Oh gosh, these people can't do this very normal thing! That must be awful!", to us, it's more like we've just been living our lives as normal and then 30+ years in, we discover that most people have a superpower that we don't have.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    But is it a superpower if the ability hadn't been called out until the 21st century? That's what kicks my ass. We can be so radically different, on what to me is a fundamental cognitive skill, yet it doesn't make enough of a difference that the ancients didn't figure it out three thousand years ago!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Thoughts are a weird thing to describe. I bet it just never really occurred to anyone to discuss specifically what they see in their head when they think of a thing - everyone just assumed what they saw was the same thing everyone saw.

    It's like the theory that the color you see as green might not be the same color I see as green - how do you actually determine that?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    You think apple and (apparently) 'see' an apple. I think apple and it's like thinking of how you'd describe an apple. It's red, it's round. It has a stem. It's juicy. It tastes good... but I can't see it. Or anything else. They're just thoughts

    I think I’m a one, but I might be a five and I can’t tell, because how do I know what format my brain uses to tell me apple? I just know that it does.

    I can imagine tastes well enough to cook pretty well and can often predict what a dish will taste like with pretty good accuracy ( I just recently saw a recipe for chocolate rosemary banana bread, and I could imagine that combination, even though I’d never had it before), so there are clearly some senses I can do it for. I think I can also do it visually, but I can’t exactly print it out, so I just know that I’ve received the thought.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    If you close your eyes and focus on an apple, what do you see? My understanding is that people without aphantasia / who are "1s" can actually see an image of the apple, as though they were looking at it. If you just see black, no image at all, you might be a 5.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I think I’m overthinking this, but I can’t tell how you would know that you’re seeing it. I think I see it if I try, but my natural inclination is more like I know the apple’s there but I’m not looking at it.

    Bizarrely, I am sure that I can “see” aspects of the apple, because that’s how I’m trying to focus on seeing it. Like, I can see the dimple where the stem connects and the curve of the apple with natural color variation for the part of the apple that I can see, but if I try to zoom out, it’s back to awareness of the apple.

    I think I’m overthinking it, because I can “see” approximations of the apple variations in this post, but maybe it’s because they’re two dimensional.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    It's possible that you're a 3 or a 4. My understanding is that people who are 1s can see the apple as though it was there in front of them. They can rotate the image in their minds, break it in half and examine the insides, see the seeds and the veins on the leaf and the discoloration near the stem. Zooming in or out isn't problematic at all.

    If you're a 5, you can certainly be aware of these things - that they're features of an apple - but if you really focus on seeing the apple - as though with your eyes, rather than just thinking about the features of the apple as qualitative properties - you can't do it. It's just blackness.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I’m not sure what difference this makes, but I can see snapshots of each of those, just not video. Though if I imagine biting into an apple, I can get all the senses together.

    I think I might have just been trying to isolate sight from the other senses, because the only real experience I have with only the sight of apples is in pictures, so it being automatically 2d does make sense.

    They can rotate the image in their minds, break it in half and examine the insides, see the seeds and the veins on the leaf and the discoloration near the stem.

    Yeah, checking now, I can see those things as well as long as I’m also feeling, hearing, and smelling them.

    Thank you! I first learned about this a while ago and I’ve occasionally wondered about it. I don’t think I would have figured it out without you talking me through it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 27 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Content not viewable in your region

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

    My sister has #5 and I can ask her to make a response if you want OP.

    Last we talked about it she said if she tried really hard she can see come colors and shapes but that's about it.

    The best conversation about it we ever had went something like this (keep in mind were both autistic and when together dont always communicate like neurotypical people do):

    *while driving*
    her: "get in that turn lane to the right"
    *i do the 👆hand tricks and turn*

    her: "when I don't want to do that I always think in my head 'never eat soggy waffles' and remember that east is left and right is west"

    me: "that's not even correct,, but like WHY would you do that??"

    her: "to remember how to turn"

    me: "why wouldn't you just do the hand things?"
    me: "like imagine them in your head and-"

    her: "MUST BE NICE HUH?"
    *we both explode in laughter*

    she didn't even mean to make a joke about it, that's just genuinely the way she remembers lefts and rights

    also this meme has become a common occurrence whenever the topic is brought up

    Also a pretty interesting thing I remembered while writing this is a clip on TV (can't remember what show it was) where they asked a room of people to draw a bicycle then they made it IRL by welding it and told them to ride it a block or two and back. Only 1 of ~15 did it correctly, one girl got it exactly but forgot the peddles. Pretty interesting how they could all imagine a bike but couldn't draw it correctly

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    The left/right story might be a different thing. Was in my 40s until I could instinctively know left from right. Before that I would snap my left fingers, or mime it, because I'm sinister and can't snap my right.

    Only way I got better was saying to myself, "This is bullshit and you're all growed up. Work on this thing." Somehow I got better, can't say how.

    I have serious issues with modelling the world in 3D, but I'm a solid 1 on the aphantasia scale. Weird.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago*

    The left/right story might be a different thing.

    very well could be, our genetics are a concoction of adhd, autism, anxiety, depression, etc etc

    i used to be able to know without doing the L R hands in highschool, but I guess that skill faded over time 🤷‍♀️
    personally it's not big enough of an issue for me to do anything about bc taking a wrong turn is way more embarrassing than doing a L R hand.

    I have serious issues with modelling the world in 3D, but I'm a solid 1 on the aphantasia scale. Weird.

    that's interesting, my sister has done some stuff with a CAD program for 3d printing and it wasn't an issue for her. What specifically do you have trouble with?

    just realized you were probably talking about a mental map rather than a 3d modeling program 😂, my sister has the same issue and hates driving because of it

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 11 months ago* (3 children)

    My brain is like a vector database, it stores the "feelings" of information, not the actual information - if that makes sense?

    I can make lightning fast connections in my head when something happens, like when something breaks in production, I see the symptoms and the vectors just connect from effect to the cause.

    Can I explain to others why and how I know where the problem is? Nope. ...Or yes, but it'll take a long time for me to follow the feeling-vectors and put them into words I can actually communicate to other people.

    For actual people and characters in books I also retain the shape and ...something about them, but I couldn't explain how most people in my life look like to a sketch artist.

    When I read a book, I kinda retain the "feeling" of the characters and maybe one or two visual traits. I can read thousands of pages of a character's adventures and I can maybe tell you their general body type and clothing - if they have an "uniform" they tend to wear.

    I've read all 5 books (over 5000 pages) of The Stormlight Archive and I couldn't tell you what Kaladin (the main character) looks like. I have no visual recollection of his hair colour, eye colour, skin tone or body type.

    It always baffled me when a movie adaptation of a book came out and people were really upset that the characters looked wrong. And I was just "... you remember what the people in books look like??". It turns out they do.

    Oh, and DEFINITELY no voice in my head. I’d get myself committed if I had someone talking to me in my brain.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    Holy cow. This is possibly the best description of how I usually think I've ever encountered. It was actually a bit unnerving to read. Though I've always conceptualized it as "shapes" and "holes" rather than vectors.

    The ability to near-instantly make connections between symptoms and cause for any given issue in a system I'm familiar with especially resonated. The best explanation I could give someone without stepping back and basically re-solving the whole thing from a standing start would be "the shapes fit together".

    It feels like I'm being asked how I knew a puzzle piece fit in a space, and for some reason "I looked at it and could see that it fit" is not a sufficient explanation. No, I didn't need to investigate other possible pieces. They are obviously different shapes. The one that you're asking about doesn't even belong to the same puzzle.

    Similarly I am also utterly incapable of describing what a person looks like in any detail. I have a "mind's eye" and can conjure up images of them in my head, but for whatever reason I just completely lack the ability to express what I see in words outside of very high level details. They have brown hair, they're tall, what do you mean "what shape is their face?" Sara's face is the shape of Sara's face. It couldn't be any other shape.

    I do have an internal monologue or voice though, but it's not constant. It usually only comes up when I'm dealing with other people and need to try to reason through what someone else is doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    For my own inner monologue, it often feels more like a preview or mirror than like hearing something external. Definitely English words, though I can also navigate nonverbal ideas in a similar sense to how you describe. The "essence" of the item, its database ID in a way.

    Same with my inner audio sense: I can play things back I've heard several times and recall, like an old song, which is just a copy of how I heard it before (mostly). If it was a 90s mp3, it'll still have whatever weird audio glitch crept in there during all the piracy. Can't pick the elements apart, it's just one layer.

    No mind's eye for me. Good spatial sense, though; it just isn't tied to any feeling of sight. As for "imagining" an apple, I definitely don't in any way see an apple. But there's a part of the brain that, when you look at an apple, takes the incoming light analyzes it, and returns "Apple". When I imagine the apple, I get that same return, the sense that I have just experienced or currently am experiencing an apple. Does my brain tell me I saw the toothy curves of the bottom of a red delicious? Yep. Did I see anything, anywhere, metaphorically or otherwise? Nope. All analysis, no pixels.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    This is a perfect representation of how my mind is laid out. Everything is a tree with things connected together by feelings/relations. Individual events are painful to keep track of (wife constantly tells me that we've already had conversations multiple times). Superfluous detail is lost immediately.

    But how a certain function in code breaking can ripple to the whole system is as natural as I breathe. Random trivia facts too, since they were novel enough to connect at the cool thing to know node. What someone wore yesterday or where the ketchup is (I don't eat ketchup) is just completely filtered out. Couldn't describe peoples faces but I know them when I see them. 99% of those "celebrity lookalike" things look nothing like them and I get baffled how people can confuse them, but I'd assume it's from them visualizing the celebrity with some error

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I can see things in my head, rotate them, look from different angles, try out different colors for a room, etc. But it's not really the same as seeing visually. It's just kind of imagining what it would look like. It's hard to explain. It's as if you were dreaming it while you are still awake. But also less vivid than a dream.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    Same here, I can rotate things in my head and change their color, but it's not quite HD. It's like an abstract image of what it should look like. It's also quite fleeting since I get easily distracted. But when I'm half-asleep or waking up on a lazy Sunday, holy shit, I can visualize so many things in bright colors and can see them clearly. I wish I could do that all the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 3 points 11 months ago

    My architect buddy wanted to hire me to handle IT, do drafting in my down time. He met me managing a reprographics shop, blueprint place. "I can't look at a blueprint and visualize what it's going to look like."

    LOL, he looked like I slapped him! Totally alien thought to that man.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    For those who are a 4 or 5 on this diagram: What are your dreams like?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago

    Pretty lifelike. Full color/sensory immersion, even to the point of feeling things like cold, heat, wind, hearing loud noises, smells etc. Sometimes, if ive been really sleep deprived, it can take me a solid few minutes to realize Im even awake and in the "real world".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    They can be amazing or terrible. Fly, go through days in dreams, sex, get chased by a monster. Lucid dreams. I also have sleep paralysis, so it can get pretty fucked up. It's like having another life. Best part is I should be too old to have nocturnal emissions. Worst part is you can be so scared you wake yourself up (and your partner) by screaming. Or, in a few instances, choking or hitting your partner in your sleep.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    But you see things vividly in your dreams?

    Like, I'm a 1 on this scale. I remember and imagine very visually. I can picture an apple sitting on a plate on a table and it looks real. In fact, my mind imagined it being slid onto the table, and the apple rocked on the plate as it slid to a stop. My imagination has a physics engine.

    I also dream vividly, the experience feels very lifelike. The few lucid dreams I had tended to fade quickly when I realized I was dreaming. I'd love to be able to cause, and then maintain, that state.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›