top 27 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 53 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I... don't understand any part of this interaction

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Edgelord shits on female comic writer for reaction. Gets reaction. Is now banned from comm so uses it to come here for more reaction.

    Talk about badly disguised fetishes....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Oh shit, I was looking for COMICS with nudes in them.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] [S] -10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The first comic I saw of hers on Reddit was one where she was advertising her patron in the comic so there’s definitely some cross-over.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Well, I was disappointed to not see any Oglaf-esqe imagery. I'm otherwise not interested in leaked celeb images.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Are they leaked if you sell them and advertise the patron on every cartoon?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Didn't look on her patron, so I wouldn't know, but if I was the one selling them, I guess I would be the one leaking them.

    SMCF, I generally enjoy your content, and had a blast looking through her comics regardless of the lack of drawn adult imagery. The announcement of her providing her nudes on her patron is a bit clumsy and I believe it led to at least two unintended interpretations.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago

    YDM, Obvious ragebaiter complaining about getting banned is like a murderer complaining about getting beaten up

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago* (9 children)

    Criticism for a woman's originally limited distribution but now leaked nude pictures in a context that didn't mention or even tangentially relate to nude pictures, hers or others? I'd say that's at least skirting misogyny.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I can't say I actually understand or care about this, but is hating someone misogynistic just because the person you hate happens to be a woman?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    Nah, not necessarily, though I think bringing attention to their sexual activities when it's not at all related to the topic is getting iffy. Then it's a matter of why. Might be slut shaming, might be they're just an arsehole, might be something else altogether.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Yeah it's deffo a weird thing to bring up in relation to a comic

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Ever been to the chippy on 23rd? Bloke sells the worst fish, and the cost! So have you seen the pictures of his weird cock?

    A completely normal conversation with strangers for @SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    this analogy is definetly weird. but justifying mod action? idk.

    however the author is a woman and for some reason i don't understand, women get more backlash for things like that, often even from other women.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Shouldn't consider it completely unrelated. The comic's last panel says "I will not indulge in your poorly disguised fetish." That's a sex thing. So the comic opens that domain of discussion by making use of it. Nudes are another fetish, so bringing them up in the already approached avenue is theoretically within the general context.

    Also, no offense, but when discussing someone's creations, unavoidably the person themselves also becomes a topic of discussion. Their past actions are brought up, in relation to the topic at hand or not. It is something we all do, whether we realize it or not.

    Is it misogynistic? I'd say it borders on it as well. However, can we be sure this wouldn't have played out the same had said nudes were of a man instead of a woman?

    But I think in this case, the user themselves and their history are what triggered a permanent ban instead of a lower punishment, which in my view shows that the comment itself wasn't really out of context after all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    SatansReddityUserName displays poorly disguised humiliation fetish

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Dude, you say extreme shit on Lemmy just to get a reaction. You got a reaction. Accept it. YDI

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -4 points 11 months ago

    There is no obvious misogyny here. At best it's edgy.

    BPR. Possibly PTB because blahaj mods often make poor decisions

  • source