
post
Desperate old pedophile tries to deflect and distract attention away from his own criminal activity.
It's not just that, an email leaked where Epstein told his brother that trump gave "Bubba" a bj...
"Bubba" is one of Clinton's nicknames. But trump literally and consentingly sucking a dick will hurt him more with his base than raping kids, even if it's not attached to a Clinton.
He thinks we won't go after someone on the same team. It's not meant to distract. It's meant to block.
We know this is much bigger than Trump. We know lots of rich people are involved. He has no idea that is the whole point.
He’s trying to change the algorithms away from “trump blew Clinton”
Do your part and search Google for “trump clinton blowjob” and “Donald trump blew bill Clinton proof” etc
For extra fun, try posing the statement to Google's AI mode and watch it try to pretend this isn't in the news right now, and then make up lies to protect Trump, until it realizes it can't a suddenly kills the conversation.
It just said to me that there wasn't any conclusive proof that it happened, which is true.
"Trump blew Clinton" led to it talking about how he "blew Clinton away at the polls in 2016." Every additional layer of specifity leads to another slight diversion. Adding "Bill Clinton" caused it to recognize that this is in the news right now, but it's definitely not true because Bubba isn't Bill Clinton. Telling it that Bubba is Bill's known nickname caused it to agree that this is true, but Epstein said that "Bubba doesn't refer to Bill Clinton." (Epstein is commenting on these emails post-mortem? Maybe I missed something here.) Telling it that Epstein is a known pedophile sex trafficker with ties to these men and reason to lie caused it to admit that Epstein isn't a reliable source for this, and it tried to dismiss the validity of the emails altogether as "contextually untrustworthy." I then told it that a known pedophile discussing his practices in a believed to be private email thread is a reasonable context to consider the validity of his statements, but it was tired of me, and went "here are some more links on the subject. Any additional messages with start a new conversation." This could normal after being 5-6 messages deep with this AI; I had literally never used it before to know, but it felt weird to me.
It is weirdly defensive about the possibility that this had taken place, actively omitting details to bias weird takes.
(Epstein is commenting on these emails post-mortem? Maybe I missed something here.)
Mark Epstein, Jeffrey's brother, apparently.
To be fair, there's no way Trump could know who was on the other side of the wall in that glory hole.
Well, except for asking, and that'd just sound like "Mmpfgharbl."
There is no factual basis or credible reporting from authoritative news sources or public records to support the claim that Donald Trump performed a sex act on Bill Clinton.
The search results discuss various political rumors, social media speculation, and unrelated news stories concerning both individuals, including the Bill Clinton-Monica Lewinsky scandal and the Jeffrey Epstein email releases. However, none of these sources contain evidence for the specific act mentioned in the user's question. The suggestions found in online forums and social media are entirely speculative and lack any factual verification.
It did mention "Jeffery Epstein email releases" in passing, but it should have given that specific email as to where the rumor came from. Definitely more vague than was reasonable to be.
It doesn't matter, the rumor has even less legs than the couch fucking. No one on the left would believe it because he's never done anything for anyone else in his life, and no one on the right would believe it because "god president daddy ain't no queer!"
Apparently trump gave ole bill a blowjob
I thought this was just some random silly comment. But apparently this is a thing
Yeah. I've been doomscrolling bsky far more than I should these days but had missed this. Apparently at least a few of the more reputable news/politics folk have actively been struggling with how to even approach this in a way that is sufficiently disrespectful to the rapist(s) while not being homophobic or misogynistic which... respect.
We need to spread this more.
The Epsteins buiseness model was basically "create blackmailable situations to sell to world leaders" and this is part of what Putin has on Trump. I saw another comment that basically said "a ring of pedophiles conspired with Russia to take over our country". Which is basically what happened and the people who voted for them got played, hard.
Maybe he's just angry that Bubba hit it and quit it.
At this point it doesn't even matter if it's true or not. The internet will MAKE it true.
Lol, I can't believe this us actually plausable with the evidence that came out. See, everyone? It's not all bad in this batshit crazy timeline.
As long as there's proof, go for it! If he's on that list, he must go, and it sets a precedent as well!
Wow, that is desperate.
Something, something projection.
It's like a five year old who accuses everyone else of doing what they are doing.
I hope Bill makes a plea deal incriminating everyone else
Clinton cares far more about his own reputation and legacy than his party or country. So not gonna happen.
That said, the funniest timeline ever would be
I did indeed have sexual relations with that man. Well, I tried to. He was so bad at it that I had to lay back and think of Hilary just to finish
Surely one of these old fucks must be feeling some remorse? What the f..
"Did you have sexual relations with President Trump?"
"I learned my lesson last time. No comment"
So Trump is our first closeted gay president?!!!!!
11/14/2025, the USA announces its first closeted gay president! The world rejoices! Its not that bad! C'mon, tell us more! Thr truth will set you free...and hopefully us too!
We can now ask for all our rights back and then some. If the president does it, then why shouldn't we also be able to enjoy those same freedoms?
Have they not seen how we treat our own party's politicians? What makes them think we're gonna suddenly rally an ex-politician?
"You think you can take me down?! I'm gonna burn your socks!"
"Eww, did you dig through my trash to find those?! Look, if you want them, you can have them, but stop threatening me with my garbage."
Of all the people to go after... The Clinton's? Someone doesn't know their crime families very well...
If Trump tries to have Clinton prosecuted, that will mean former presidents can be prosecuted for this, which means Trump has no intention of ever leaving office
Clinton: dude, I already had to deal with one blow job scandal, if you go through with this, I may as well go through another.
Well, we already knows he likes 'em on the hefty side. On the other hand:
"I did not have sexual relations with that creep. I'd never want to stir Putin's porridge."
It's like threatening (most) Independents/Democrats with investigating Nancy Pelosi. 🤷♂️ Like, go for it.






all 66 comments