The problems with artificial intelligence is plentiful. So I basically wanted to do a poll where the people answering could tell me what they see one of the more fundamental problems are with artificial intelligence and or what is their biggest concern with artificial intelligence specifically in the way that is going to affect either the planet, the society or humanity as a whole.

One of my major issues with artificial intelligence is that these developers of it are putting hundreds of billions upwards to trillions of dollars into it to try to manifest this artificial false intelligence instead of putting that money into education systems so that people can increase their actual real intelligence. This is even more insulting seeing how the current society is getting dumber due to social media and the artificial intelligence with the AI slop is making them even dumber. The insult is twice-fold.

all 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    the thing is in specific ways much older, i think that if you want to stretch it the first people you can credibly accuse of being ai bros were alchemists trying to cook homunculus, or trying to get infinite knowledge out if philosophers' stone

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It’s another wealth transfer; the wealth hoarding class wants to further devalue the skills of working class people.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Aside from dehumanization, grifting and the environment, I read somewhere that AI and Crypto companies will trigger the next financial crisis within a year. It is expected to be larger than the 1929 one. With the formerly most powerful nation of the planet being led by a demented baboon who is played by a bunch of tech millionaires, I find this very concerning.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago

    We are already in a financial crisis. However, I see what you mean with this bubble of speculatory projection of investments. Basically, they expect it to be the next big thing, which of course it will if they are unstopped.

    The part that everyone is missing is that they plan to do away with money on purpose and intentionally.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I like having water... my friends in Texas and California have seen water levels lowering and their bills rising. I'm in Michigan and terrified for the Great Lakes

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The pollution of water will certainly increase. People must protest, boycott and if need be remove by force these AI data centers

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    You can't have water pollution if there is no water

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] -2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    There will always be water. So yes indeed you can and will have water pollution from running water through these mechanical pipes to cool the GPUs

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Accountability. When the AI causes measurable harm to an individual or group, will the owner of the service be held accountable in the same way that an individual would be? I doubt it. The corporations will just pay settlements and keep doing everything in their power to avoid being held responsible for what their AI says or does. People are too trusting of corporations and anthropomorphized software.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 4 points 1 year ago

    I expect that the AI will not have any form of accountability put on it, and the companies won't be held liable. Currently, even without AI, they already pay settlements to get out of any wrongdoing. The AI ironically would probably be given human rights. All of the benefits, constitutionally, with none of the consequences.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    My major issue in general is how much trust people would have for AI and blindnessly follow them without much doubt if whatever they are saying is true. Computers are stupid, they will make mistake which often cause by coders making one in the code.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -12 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    The AI codes itself. Chatgpt 4 and 5, anthropic, gemini. Have not been coded by humans. When people.realize this it will be too late. The false information/lies the AI tells is due to only 2 reasons.

    1. It is a small model and doesn't know the answer.

    2. It is lying on purpose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 9 points 11 months ago (1 child)
  • [+] [S] -9 points 11 months ago

    You are a typical person who lacks understanding of anything. He's saying that AI is the next word predictor. Suggest The only LLMs or GPT exists. You are ignoring algorithmic AI. deep neural learning models, SDVs, etc. You have no idea About the other types of AI outside of the mainstream media, these chatbots everyone is used to. Silence now.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I feel that AI really is like a two three edged sword.

    • Used responsibly and double and triple checked by humans, it can do some amazing things.
    • Used irresponsibly it can have millions of people under the false impression that someone said or did something that never happened.
    • Used for obvious silliness and not trying to deceive people, well okay, everyone needs a laugh now and then.

    For the most part, I think AI should never be used for serious purposes, but when it is, the results need to be triple checked by actual human experts. Fuckall with the deepfakes and slop though.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If humans double and triple checked the artificial intelligence, this would only be possible if it was traditional AI models and not AGI, or something that is trying to be good at everything. When it's good at everything, you can't double check the models. It's not possible. There's no way to tell what it's doing behind the scenes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I once wrote a rather low resolution 'assisted' OCR program to scan in and convert image documents to plain text. It worked like a crude AI of sorts, and would make mistakes as always, but if the 16x16 grid of low-res pixels fell below a certainty threshold, it would pause and ask the user to type the character(s) it was observing.

    I seeded it with a fairly generic font for reference, to start with anyways. But as the program progressed, the model would adapt the recognized font to the point that by like 1/4 of the way through the scanned document, it had a much higher certainty factor and could more or less continue without much human intervention.

    By the time the program finished, I could also dump its internal adjusted memory to see what the text font looked like to the computer. If I scaled that up way past 16x16 potato blocks, I could upscale the concept to detect exactly what font was used. Assuming I had a rip of every font that's ever existed anyways..

    In the right hands (with models that actually make sense), it's totally possible to know exactly what AI is doing behind the scenes. But still needs human eyes to double and triple check the results before getting the Stamp Of Approval™

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    To my mind, there are several big concerns, of which it's hard to pick one:

    • Invasiveness and total disregard for people's privacy;
    • Laws being rewritten in favor of Big Tech;
    • AI being used without proper oversight, especially in programming (where it already introduces critical bugs), science and education (where it already blurs scientific truth);
    • Intelligent, naturally speaking bots swaying public opinion in the interests of the few;
    • An exponential growth of AI training datacenters and the subsequent effect on an environment, alongside the "let's just throw more money at it" kind of problem-solving.

    I might be in the minority here, but I believe AI is here to stay, and our duty is to make sure it doesn't persist in this evil form, with shady private hands shaping our lives for their profit, reckless and greedy.

    AI must be transparent, public, sustainable and ethical. Along LLMs, the most discussed subset of it, LLaMA and then many more have shown us that AI can be open-source and transparent. DeepSeek has shown smart engineering greatly reducing the costs and environmental impact of AI training, and more. Now it's time to make AI public and ethical as well.

    The way it exists today, however, it can burn in hell, and I wish they got an especially hot cauldron there for Altman and the likes. Oh, and whoever develops military AI - I wish them a very pleasant miscalculation that would make them the target.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    It does not work. Plain and simple. It is artificial, but far from intelligent. In the end, they are parrots with a dictionary, and that dictionary is actually stolen.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    I have two main concerns.

    First, it simply does not deliver what their designers promise. As in: it is far from being an intelligence. It does not think. It just processes (mostly stolen) data to imitate a conversation not based on actually understanding what it does, it basically mimics humans by application of statistics.

    Second, because some people and companies have wasted tons of money in this already, they are doomed to reap money back somehow to delay the AIs stock bubble's popping. Therefore, they fake acceptance by stuffing AI down every users throat, regardless of, and often even against users express wishes.

    If i google something, I am perfectly happy with search results pointing to human made pages like wikipedia or stack exchange or IMDB. I don't need a crazy digital monkey at the top that either just parrots what the page I was looking for says, or, worse, which produces total junk replies.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    My main concerns are resources and labor. We're already struggling with getting off of dirty fuels and now we have this enormous demand to meet, plus water reserves are going to become more and more stressed. The interests of capital always wins over the needs of people especially in America where quite literally our economy now hinges on the success of AI companies.

    As for labor, again from the US perspective, human life has no "value" to the ruling class if it cannot labor and produce a profit for others. As AI takes more and more jobs, people will not be taken care of, they'll be left to suffer in poverty. Eventually the AI systems will become better integrated into better robotic systems and then the job loss spreads way past "office work" and an enormous amount of jobs are lost.

    I don't have a very bright view for the future to be honest. The interests of capital always win. :/

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    Besides how low-effort it is to use AI in any project, I fear the porn and what the psychological and cultural impacts will be in the long run on gen alpha and beyond.

    I know that porn, specifically, has pushed forward many different technologies that are now fully mainstream. I don't necessarily have an issue with porn if it's made between consenting adults and the consumer doesn't have an addiction to it. However, things like ComfyUI are making the whole deepfake thing massively accessible to anyone. From training it on pictures scraped off social media all the way to generating full on explicit videos. It's already happened many times, and will only get worse as this goes unfettered, but kids are making porn of other kids. Whether it be out of spite, they think it's a harmless joke, or whatever. I'm sure there are adults making porn of kids, too.

    Other people in here have made excellent points, all valid IMO, but this one scares and saddens me the most.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    That it’s not AI but is marketed as such. It has and will continue to kill people.

    That it is a tool for the non-working class to extract labour and productivity from the working class without having to risk rewarding the working class with anything.

    They steal our skills to train their models without paying. They charge us to train and reinforce their models. Then they use them to flood the market to suppress wages or eliminate jobs altogether while using our money to lobby against social programs like UBI.

  • source