all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 1 year ago

Meh. I perform much better at shorter distances. Even at my peak, my long distance runs were under the expectations of where they should be based on my 5km time. Even the genetic test I did said I'm built more for running fast 5kms than I am for running marathons and half marathons.

Yet for all of that, if I'm running an event, I'm going to run a half marathon, because I just don't enjoy 5km as much as I enjoy long distances. Unless it's a parkrun, it's not worth getting out of bed for a 5km running event.

  • source
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago

    This isn't an "article," it's just from somebody's blog where they are free to post their hot takes. I don't think it's particularly click-baity either.

    I shared it here because I also don't agree with it, and I was curious whether it would resonate with anyone here. I'm in a bubble where the thing many people aspire to is to go beyond marathon distance, but there are also plenty of folks in my running club who say then run 10Ks and that's it, and they don't feel they have to justify that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Very clickbait-y title just to say the marathon is an arbitrary distance that people care about way too much; myself included.

  • source