Hydrogen is not easy as it seems. Nor is cheap but that's less important.
post
It's long past time for Japanese automakers to accept that currently hydrogen has lost the green fuel race in automobiles to battery electric. There's still room for hydrogen aviation, but I can't imagine choosing to purchase a hydrogen car in the 2020s
There's still room for hydrogen aviation,
Is there really? I read the tanks make it impractical and that synthetic hydrocarbon jet fuel would be the likely fossil fuel replacement.
A number of major aerospace companies are working on the concept, so I wouldn't say it's not feasible. But the jury is very much still out.
I thinks it’s more that there is no acceptable solution for aviation yet, so yes there’s room
- batteries will never have sufficient power density
- plant based fuels are unlikely to scale
- hydrogen has technical challenges
- ammonia is dangerous
Every option has significant limitations but we need something to work
Solid state batteries may well be dense enough. Admittedly, that is something of a "two years away for the last ten years" problem.
It's also a safety issue. Now, the issues with safety in EVs is overblown, but commercial aviation has much tighter safety standards. Fortunately, solid state batteries fix that, too.
Airplane fuel is dangerous and full of lead. Every time people list disadvantages of alternative technologies, they pretend current fuels aren't a toxic dangerous mess.
Jet fuel doesn’t contain lead and never did.
AvGas does still have a lead problem and it was commonly used before the jet age, but is now relegated to small general aviation aircraft - a miniscule percentage. If you look at aviation as a whole, leaded gas usage is effectively zero.
Really the problem comes down to contamination at and near small historical airfields.
The other side of this is if there's a solid state lithium battery breakthrough. That would have both the energy density and safety margins to be usable for even Pacific flights.
brake failure
flashbacks to 15 years ago
"Toyota. Moving forward. (Even when you don't want to.)"
This article neglects to mention what I am wondering most about: is there any merit to this case, are similar lawsuits staeted in Europe for example? Or is this another example of the US administration, funded by many many oil and gas dollars, going after the commercial enemies of its main financial supporters?
Good, now we can finally bury that dead end technology.
No, it is not worth "taking every possible approach and finding out what works". This is a faux-reasonable argument that catches people who haven't been following trends over the past 20 years. We already did that, and now is the time to deploy what works. Batteries won, deal with it.
I was actually really excited for hydrogen tech. Like a refuelling station just needs sunlight and water. But Toyota really rat fucked themselves, and caused so much damage by relentlessly attacking battery electric vehicles.
they are 10years too late to develop the tech, when ev has been making strides ever since. one of the shortlived X-FILE spinoffs where the 3 scientist(technicians in the orginal x-files) developed a hydrogen fuel cell tech, or equivalent they dint go on "patent/market it" because it, something along the lines of becoming to eco-destructive wanting(building more roads, infrastructure)
all 35 comments