all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

One German state, one French city, some Danish government organizations and two Austrian ministries. I wouldn't call that "gaining steam" and i hope the rest is following but wants to keep it under the radar.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's a lot compared to a year ago, no? And yeah, agencies tend to be very risk-averse, don't want to move to an unproven platform. A few success stories will help the rest follow.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Yeah military and economy are quite important ministries i guess. Hopefully the rest of big ol' Germany will watch closely and adapt. I think the whole Microsoft blocking e-mail accounts from ICC members event should have switched perspectives regarding risk aversion for quite some governments and agencies.

  • source
  • parent
  • 5 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [โ€“] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Is there some beautiful autistic mind keeping infographical track of this stuff? My mere lesser brain only just entertained the idea of how interesting that'd be ro see.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I know that the article says that these entities all vow to โ€œkeep data storage and processing within national or European bordersโ€, but how are they achieving that at scale?

    Does this movement also apply to the underlying cloud-infra too? I donโ€™t see any related info on the infrastructure part of this being moved away from AWS, Azure or GCP.

    Mainly interested in how these organisations are going to solve this problem, as Iโ€™ve been working to do something similar myselfโ€ฆ and itโ€™s hard to be completely independent of these hyperscalers.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments