cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/38271574

The International Criminal Court (ICC) will switch its internal work environment away from Microsoft Office to Open Desk, a European open source alternative, the institution confirmed to Euractiv.

German newspaper Handelsblatt first reported on the plans. The switch comes amid rising concerns about public bodies being reliant on US tech companies to run their services, which have stepped up sharply since the start of US President Donald Trump’s second administration.

For the ICC, such concerns are not abstract: Trump has repeatedly lashed out at the court and slapped sanctions on its chief prosecutor, Karim Khan.

all 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 46 points 1 year ago

The ICC is one of those orgs where not having their data sitting on silicon valley servers is a big friggin' deal, and they should have probably thought of that years ago.

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I look forward to a Europe fully on its own cloud and software stacks or at least FOSS options.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    How about own cloud stack on nextcloud?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I haven't tried NextCloud but it looks more like a hosted application stack like M365 rather than a general purpose cloud like AWS/Azure/gcloud. What would be really cool is a homegrown cloud that emulated AWS/Azure/gcloud API's so that you could easily port existing applications over.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Let's hope that this process will continue even after Trump

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Has anyone used OpenDesk? Looks like they have a community edition

  • source
  • 11 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 61 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    For anyone wondering: openDesk, the solution they're using, wasn't developed from the ground up. It contains standard open source tools like Nextcloud, Matrix and Collabora.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'm glad they finally had an easy to understand example of why depending on a closed source ecosystem from a foreign country is insane for any kind of public authority.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    a German-developed software

    a [...] software

    \sigh

    That's like requesting 1 happiness or 11 lovely.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    Microsoft Office: it’s not even good enough for international criminals anymore ™

  • source
  • 8 comments in c/technology@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Never heard of open desk...

    Why not pick the typical LibreOffice?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Although they didn't pick LibreOffice, the project which I personally use, a move from the entire ICC to choose opensource software is insane. Hopefully, and likely any funding they will do to improve software will go to the opensource community

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If the OpenDesk software is open source, will that mean each government body will start using a different flavor of it? Seems like an upkeep nightmare for governments.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 3 comments in c/opensource@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Microsoft has and will continue to do Trumps bidding when it comes to the ICC, so this is a very good but also very late decision.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "very late" for you, now; in hundred years it may be considered a timely decision taken early on at the start of the American MAGAification

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    In my opinion, any Public Administration depending on software without control over the source (paying contractor is another debate) is a bad idea, you don't have to wait for a company to go rogue (for its client) to realize it.

    What transparency can you get if you don't know your software ? Trusting publisher without permanent audit is worthless, also, with this amount of dependency, corruption could arise just to keep it.

    If in the future they consider it good timing, this should be considered a defeat.

  • source
  • parent
  • 2 comments in c/europe@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I hadn't heard of openDesk before. Here they are talking at last year's LibreOffice Conference, in case anyone is interested.

    Good to see public open source software picking up steam. It's fucking insane that it took corporate platforms enabling fucking genocidal mass murder of civilians for years while actively obstructing international justice and sanctioning the international criminal court—a dystopian vision even Stallman would have struggled to come up with—for it to take place, but at least it's fucking happening.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 1 comment in c/opensource@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    Hopefully they will pay for it and train their staff to use it. Otherwise they are just setting themselves up for failure and some "Christian Democrat" to accept a Microsoft bribe and claim there are "too many problems".

    P. S Thank you Trump for sanctioning the head of the ICC. Please sanction more people with the power to make pro opensource decisions 😍

  • source