Got into a work 'argument' yesterday with someone from CyberSec that would not believe a tool we use could not do the thing he wanted me to have it do. I'd researched it and had direct links from the vendor, but CoPilot told him otherwise so I had to spend half an hour rehashing the same thing over and over as he adjusted his stupidass input data until CoPilot basically told him 'whoops I lied about this.'
post
I don't think the type of boss to cite ChatGPT is going to take well to this reaponse.
Yep, employee will be fired for "disrespectful" "gross misconduct."
Just fire them. Their bosses know that AI is just a marketing term to bring in VC investment.
The big bosses know thst it's not actually useful, and it causes harm to the org internally
Lmao, a moment ago our friend group is talking about dream and nightmare, one guy just post an AI wall of text talking about what dream mean, and it does read exactly like a pseudo-science. I mean no harm to him, but it's just silly because the text from AI sound so authoritative and assertive while i have to look at medical site each time i googled and think "is this site legit or is it copypasta tabloit?"
I think it's really how people operate on the internet, they don't doubt source because it's on the internet.
When anyone drops an ai blob in a discussion I ignore it and continue the discussion as if it was not there.
If I wanted to ask an llm, I would do it myself.
Tbh, I almost never ask or am asked for a source in person (not that I believe everything I hear, I’ll just look it up later unless it’s a specific type of social situation), but it happens a lot online. I don’t know how I would respond if someone dropped some obvious bullshit in a group chat, because it’s a different type of interaction.
I disagree that LLMs are good for summarizing information. They are good at TRUNCATING information. They do not possess the necessary cognitive abilities to accurately understand and distill something down into salient points consistently and reliably.
I'm getting at least 2-3 calls a week now at work from people looking for something we don't sell, and getting mad because ChatGPT told them we do.
I like sending pictures of the animals at the zoo to ChatGPT and have them identify the animal. It gets a lot wrong. It also says there are capybaras there when there aren't.
Add to this that AI is scraping the internet,… the free open internet, and many posters are employees who want to keep their jobs are easily feeding false information on the internet intentionally tainting AI
That's an awful lot of reading for people who can't be bothered to go down a few sections of the page and get the information themselves.
one minute, let me get chatgpt to summarize this, I can't bother to read it...
Fuck this site; it lost me when it got to listing "What kinds of things might they be good at?"
Just say no.
Using an LLM to summarize something is still a bad idea. The chances of it emphasizing the wrong thing, omitting the most important thing, or just outright making up "facts" remains high. LLMs Will Always Hallucinate.
The best use for this is i18nl
I can explain this fine in English. What I need is to explain it to the store clerk when I ask them a question in broken foreign language, and they hand me their phone, showing the regurgitated answer from AI
I want to load this site and hand it to them. In their language.
Some people earlier in this thread were reporting that it was not in Quad9 DNS yet. Your DNS provider may not have it yet, although it's been several hours since those posts...
top 32 comments