all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Defining "a runner" as someone who ran two times per week for at least 75% of weeks of the year, they get:

  • Japanese runners run the furthest. 41.5 km per week, nearly a marathon equivalent!
  • UK runners average 31.1 km
  • UK non-runners average 7.2 km
  • South African runners average the longest record run, at 42.5 km
  • UK runners average 30.7 km
  • UK non-running Garmin users do 15.3 km
  • Global average run pace is 5:39
  • UK does 5:50, according to the article. Though it also says the UK does better than the global average, so something may be wrong with their reporting
  • Ireland: 5:24
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    UK runners have an average of both 31.1km and 30.7km?? Which one is the correct one then?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Appears to be a conversion issue. Assuming the reported min/mile pace is correct, the UK average pace is 05:34, not 5:50.

    (I'm guessing these numbers are means, not medians.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Assuming the reported min/mile pace is correct

    Ah I see, thanks. I completely skipped over the min/mile paces, because they're completely useless to me. I'm a runner first and foremost, and that pretty much requires working in kilometres even if I didn't use kilometres for my day-to-day, since all common races are measured in kilometres (from the 100 m sprint up to the 42.195 km marathon).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment