all 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Fr having moved somewhere I can comfortably walk/bike/ride a lot of where I want/need to go has been a massive improvement to my life.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Pick any city with a good rail line.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    DC, Chicago, Seattle, NYC, I hear mixed things about Boston

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Oh I don't live in the US lol. I guess I didn't specify.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Oh well this is really the sort of thing you should be able to Google. And if you're going to ask questions without specifying country like an American, especially ones revolving around car culture…

    Looks like you have a .ca there neighbor, in which case from what I hear you're fucked in that regard though Vancouver is building out a rail line and Toronto is obstinately refusing to. Montreal probably has decent transit though, nobody can tell as they speak french

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    I'm moving soon from a small town with nothing but a Circle K on the main road where last year 6 people died trying to cross the street, to a pretty big town with a bustling downtown and sidewalks the whole way to my new house ~2.5 miles away.

    I'll be a 5-10 minute walk from a shopping center with a grocery store, a sports complex, a public library and a lot more.

    I'm absolutely stoked. I grew up in the city and the sort of strandedness the last few years has really affected my mental health.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Wealth redistribution would fix all of them

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Someone told me once that Americans love Disneyland so much because it's the only time in their lives in they're in a walkable town and that made me think. Makes me look at cruise ships in a new light too.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    It's so fucking nice!

  • source
  • [+] -9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Oooh a post that will attract the fuckcars brigade! Let’s guess: will genuinely curious questions or even the mildest of criticism be absolutely buried in downvotes? Stay tuned to find out!

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Love how triggered you are, speaks volumes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I don’t drive, but I wanted to point out just how unhinged and disconnected from reality the echo chamber you’ve formed around yourself has become.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'm sorry that internet points are so triggering for you that you had to come here just to point out that most members of the anti-car community are going to vocally disagree with the contrarian pro-car sentiment that finds its way here. Truly groundbreaking, thanks for your contribution.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -25 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Walkable "towns" would bed an interesting study in contradictions. By the time you get to walkability, you have a city.

    And that replaces your 19 problems and adds about 50 more.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Nah, small towns can be walkable too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Does that affect the ordinary day of somebody living there though? If their daily grind of home, work, groceries, school, etc switched from being car trips to being walks, it should still improve their life.

    If they're already going out of town to find fun attractions on the weekends it occasional evenings, that part of their routine won't change much.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Towns of all sizes can be walkable, there just might not be as many things to walk to.

    Some examples include

    • most college towns (and of course the colleges themselves)
    • towns built out before the car - here in New England we have many

    My town is very walkable, although it does have 60,000 so is not that small. We also have two colleges where the campuses are walkable but no real college town and two train stations, with a third planned. Does it “become a city” because we zone to allow five story apartment building near the train station at the town common?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I grew up in a ~250k pop town which had like 90% of the town in 1h walk from the center. Not something you'll do every day but it definitely simplifies getting home after night parties.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    This is the most ignorant take I’ve heard in a long time, so congrats on that I guess. Walkable towns are in some ways easier than walkable cities. A city you need to be walkable across the entire city, over and over again, a town just needs to do it once. Anyway, I live in a walkable small town. One of several I’ve lived in. It’s great.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Take a look into archologies. Specifically Arcosanti. We can definitely do it, but we would essentially have to design the cities from the ground up with that approach in mind.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Sorry, but the thoughts I have with regard to arcologies go in very different ways from yours.

    It's a panopticon. a complete police state where there's no privacy, no individual freedoms. Everyone is watched all the time because no one is ever outside the zone of control or between overlapping zones of control to create jurisdictional gray areas. Everything is rationed, because the arcology has to operate on the concept that everything you need is in the arcology. That means resources must be tightly controlled - and so only the rich & powerful get what they want, and everyone else might be allowed to exist. And of course they can't be allowed to leave, because then the labor force to support the rich people will be gone. So any possible arcology becomes a massive prison - at best.

    Second, I'll admit that I'm a Shadowrun fan. Possibly one of the greatest tragedies in that setting was the horrific incident in the Renraku Arcology. And really it's just an image of what could happen. People are closed in and murdered by something they can't control.

    I live in the densest part of the USA, in a metropolitan area that can give my friends and loved ones from rural areas a panic attack just by existing. More consolidation and more control terrifies me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Me thinking about what an arcology would be like when I was playing the hot new game Sim City 2000: "Imagine the technology in these things, and maybe they're an important option for human expansion if propulsion technology doesn't make huge leaps, and oh maybe with some really good deep geothermal for power they can be so land area efficient..."

    Me thinking what an arcology would be like when I exist in 2025: "Yeah they were pretty coo- wait... What about the governments? What about the corporations that build and administrate these things and employ people? Are all those entities even distinct from one another? This isn't a post scarcity Star Trek techno heaven, it is a real world Final Fantasy 7 shit pie with the haves living literally on top of the have-nots. No, no, forget that, these things are going to destroy the mental health of the people in them even before we add the evils of modern society!!"

  • source
  • parent
  • 9 comments in c/fuckcars@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 35 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Imagine how much money you would have if you didn't have to own a car

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Unfortunately, the most walkable cities tend to be the most expensive but wouldn’t be if it was like that everywhere. Pre-WW2 America was so cool because it had a balance of walkable cities with cars. You could still take a train from some middle of no where town to the big city because the town was built on the railroad…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Jay-Z ironically living in maybe the most walkable city in the country.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago
    [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I do wish the town I lived in was more walkable. You can but it's a bit big and sprawling residential areas so it takes a long time. Peninsula with most retail at the tip doesn't help. Cycling around is pretty good though.

  • source
  • Cops will still stop him going you've been walking 55 in a 54.

  • source