all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah, Apple is just gonna leave the billions in revenue to Google and Samsung. Sounds plausible.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Oh lord, they brought up porn apps. I’m fine with the walled garden.

    If Apple would consider more support for PWAs, we would have less of these problems. But noooooooooo, PWAs mean app-like experiences without the need to pay Apple.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    And nothing of value will be lost

  • source
  • 59 comments in c/technology@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 82 points 1 year ago

    obvious bluff is obvious

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Apple wouldn't stop. They need that money too much. Also, Europe is OK with going Huawei if Google and Apple keep up with their shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Came here to say the same. It's an empty threat. After all this is famously the company who made dual physical SIM iPhones for China and other Asian regions because eSIM isn't/wasn't legal.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 52 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    They would never stop selling their products in Europe lol. And if they did, I wouldn’t care, even though I own a few Apple products.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Yeah, we don't really have systemic/infrastructure dependency on Apple. Compared to Microsoft (which we are dependant upon atm) who can and does extort the EU a bit everywhere it can.

    That's why foss all the things!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    You should never pay a blackmailer, because that incentives blackmailing. Still, everyone pays, because that causes the least pain

    Same with this, they can bluff all they want; in the end, they won't not sell their devices in Europe, because that would mean lost profit and the least pain is complying.

    Go die in a dirty back alley apple, you deserve it

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 122 points 1 year ago

    Do it stop shipping.

  • source
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Don't threaten me with a good time Apple.

    It's just empty threats though. The EU market is bigger than America (considering population sizes only), there is no way they'd give up on that

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Given android id more popular in Europe than America, you could say apple is behind in market share, so providing less features is not a great business plan.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Apple sold well over $10 billion worth of Iphones in the EU in 2024, but rather than deal with the annoyance of EU regulation they're just going to take their ball and go home.

    They must think EU regulators are imbeciles.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Or they think the people in the EU will do mass protests if they don’t get their product— forcing the regulators hands; maybe because of what happened with tiktok in Nepal— missing the nuance of the political and economic factors there however.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Apple is a piece of shit company.

    Learn how to compete without behaving anti competitively or quit your fucking jobs. It's not complicated.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    The problem is, and I'm pretty sure that's the reason nothing will change, the problem is that people act like corporations have some kind of obligation to act morally. Then they are angry at apple, Microsoft, Monsanto and co.

    Corporations are a fucking tool, that try to maximize profit not more, not less.

    What everyone has forgotten is, that there should be people setting the rules and optimizing this tool for the best of the people. Instead we all accepted these neo liberal bullshit, where we allow corporations to influence the law. And, oh wonder, who would have thought, these fucking tools use their money and influence to maximize profit even though everyone but the stakeholder suffers from it.

    Renewable energy is an example, how in the world can someone prefer burning coal or oil instead of letting the wind turn a fan? But because big oil companies have a way to big part in creating those laws, we fuck the planet until it's too late and when it's too late, everyone will blame the tool for it. Which won't change a fucking thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    Yeah I'm sure Apple's going to give up on half a billion potential customers. Sure.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Knowing Apple, they’ll probably find a way to ‘comply’ that feels more like a loophole than a solution....

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    I remember when apple used to reverse engineer microsoft software.. :/

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Among the requirements of the DMA is that Apple ensures that headphones made by other brands will work with iPhones. It said this has been a block on it releasing its live translation service in the EU as it allows rival companies to access data from conversations, creating a privacy problem.

    I'm not really understanding this. Where is the privacy problem? What is different with airpods that solves this? At the end of the day, are they not just bluetooth headphones? Do they add some extra security layer beyond what bluetooth itself offers?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    They need us (our money). We dont even like them enough to not replace them the second they go away.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    Oh no! How will I ignore their products now?

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Am I misreading this or are their arguments all complete nonsense? From what I can see in the article they have:

    1. They have to allow third-party headphones, i.e. the anti-monopoly policy prevents a monopoly.

    Among the requirements of the DMA is that Apple ensures that headphones made by other brands will work with iPhones. It said this has been a block on it releasing its live translation service in the EU as it allows rival companies to access data from conversations, creating a privacy problem.

    1. Other companies will "twist laws" to prevent competition, i.e. exactly what Apple is trying to do by removing regulation. I don't see any way to interpret this other than an outright lie, anti-monopoly policies encourage competition.

    Apple said that under the DMA, “instead of competing by innovating, already successful companies are twisting the law to suit their own agendas – to collect more data from EU citizens, or to get Apple’s technology for free”.

    1. Porn exists? I don't even know what they're trying to say with this one?

    It said that rules under the act affected the way it provided users access to apps. “Pornography apps are available on iPhone from other marketplaces – apps we’ve never allowed on the App Store because of the risks they create, especially for children,” it said.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
    1. This is actually a privacy problem. If any company can access the live feed, it opens up serious surveillance issues. Granted, we have to trust Apple won’t surveil…
    2. I agree
    3. This has more to do with content moderation than prudishness. If you’re being held accountable for what kids can access on your platform, you take a very draconian approach. Granted, no one is yelling at Dell for allowing Steam to install porn games…
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago*

    Our overlords from Brussels are fucking pussies rn. They want to monitor our messages and verify everything. And they also want to ban privacy coins for some reason.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    That was always allowed

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago

    Cool, stop shipping the walled garden shit then.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Please stop shipping to anywhere.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Be pretty funny if Europe just banned them instead.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    I give a fuck, I anyway prefer to lick ny belly before buying something from Apple.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That yellow part is about to shrink and the orange part is about to go away completely when Google's dev verification hits next year unless you have a custom rom.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Good idea, safari sucks.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I like my iPhone. It's solid hardware and reasonably capable software. It does everything I need it to do, and gives me really solid control over API access to privacy-centric controls like location and microphone.

    I still wouldn't skip a beat to switch to another phone manufactured by another company (though I regret how much of a duopoly there is). The inconvenience is minor; Apple just needs to give me a shove and I'll switch.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Big tech only cares about money, something that makes them very predictable. Very high fines and banning costs them money, so they will comply to all demands to avoid. Easy as that :)

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Who cares? The average EU citizen will benefit far more from the regulation. I don't think any of their laws have been bad so far, mostly requiring standard connectors, requiring user access to install what they want without apples permission, and monopolizing software stores in general. This might be a great opportunity to actually get some consumer friendly competition out of Europe for once. Also Samsung already allows third party app stores, has USB C like every other modern device, and allows side loading. It's going to get interesting once Google starts complaining that they can't control users devices after they buy them as well with their upcoming ban on non Google approved software installations.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    "If you don't let us misbehave, we're gonna cut off like a good 4th of our market share"

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Hey Apple... Fuck you

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    , lol, good riddance.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Just the evil nature of a megacorp manifesting in monology tenancies.

    Anti-monopoly laws are at most too loose atm, not too strict.

    (Also the threat is just a threat, they've been saying that for a decade now.)

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Don’t threaten us with a good time Apple!

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Apple hardware has never been more boring, one iterative release after another. They rely on software and services to lock users in.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    We should pay attention as alternatives are dwindling. Google wants Android to be more like iOS, you may not have as much freedom of choice as you think you do.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Тhe last time I would have bought an Apple it would have been an Apple ][.

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/technology@lemmy.zip view that post
    [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    It may stop shipping to the EU

    Lol, right. Talk about an empty threat.

    iPhone has about a 30% market share in the EU, which means Android is about 70% (I'm sure there's probably 2% that's something else).

    Apple stops shipping to EU, that will drop to 5%, giving away 25% market share.

    Pleas Apple, stop shipping to the EU, when you become a bit player everywhere but the US, you'll have to start competing by opening up.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago*

    Oh yes, they will 100% exit the second most profitable market...

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 37 points 1 year ago*

    Yes, clearly you'll give up all your marketshare in Europe to Android, makes sense.

    Among the requirements of the DMA is that Apple ensures that headphones made by other brands will work with iPhones. It said this has been a block on it releasing its live translation service in the EU as it allows rival companies to access data from conversations, creating a privacy problem.

    Is this an issue because the headphones are connected to some app made by the headphone company or something? I'm trying to figure out why this is an issue when headphones (at least that I've seen/used) don't have internet access.

  • source