The jets just keep on comin'!

Two German Eurofighter jets were scrambled on Sunday to intercept a Russian military aircraft above the Baltic Sea, as Estonia said it would call an emergency meeting of the UN security council after Russian planes violated its airspace.

Germany’s air force said the Russian Il-20M reconnaissance plane had switched off its transponders and ignored requests to make contact. The Eurofighters took off from the Rostock-Laage airbase to head off the aircraft as it flew in international airspace.

Tensions between Nato and Russia have been dramatically rising after a series of what European governments say are deliberate, provocative acts by the Kremlin. On Friday, three Russian MiG-31 fighters violated Estonian airspace in the Gulf of Finland. Moscow denies this.

1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 13 points 1 year ago

"I'm not touching you!" is a poor way to run international politics.

  • source
  • 56 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 102 points 1 year ago* (14 children)

    See, now you've got a problem. If you'd shot down the first one, Russia would have made a big noise and then it would have been fine. Now that you didn't, now it's weird if you start shooting them down.

    My advice is to just be straight about it: Publicly announce what the line is where you'll shoot them down, and then stick to it. Even if you just announced a date when the shooting-down will start any time they enter NATO airspace, that might be fine. But you have to stick to it. Right now you're trying to figure out how to make them stop without shooting them down, and that approach just doesn't work. Like you're all surprised they don't establish radio contact. Bro... that is not the game you are engaged in.

    (You might also want to confiscate $10 billion in frozen Russian assets to give to Ukraine for each incursion, just to respond to what's already happened... but again without shooting them down it's not going to accomplish anything. The money's already gone honestly, and they know that, they're just waiting for you to figure it out and go through your whole "process" and make it official, and they think you're stupid and weak for every year that goes by that you're not doing that.)

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [+] 24 points 1 year ago* (7 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    so they are already preparing to move further.

    They are barely managing the war with ukraine and you want me to believe they are moving further than that? EU countries combined are matching already russia military expenses, they are looking for excuses to boost war industry even more. Check the data and watch out for propaganda.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    EU countries combined are matching already russia military expenses

    Check the data

    The US plus all partners has sent about $150 billion in total, it looks like, up until the middle of last year: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1303432/total-bilateral-aid-to-ukraine/ About half of that is EU, so say $75 billion from the EU.

    Russia spends about $500 billion per year: https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2025/02/12/russias-2024-military-spending-surpassed-eu-uk-combined-in-ppp-terms-study-a87974 They have mobilized basically their entire economy to try to win this thing.

    What is your source for saying the EU alone is matching Russia? The EU is barely paying attention to the war, because of complacency and a subtle racism. But the idea that the EU is pulling out all the stops like Russia is, or prioritizing making their "defense" contractors rich in this as the US is wont to do, is absurd.

    and watch out for propaganda.

    Can do! I think I might have found some, I'm not sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Yeah. I'm not exactly a geopolitics-man, but my best guess for what's going on with Putin and Russia's strategy here is:

    1. He'd been doing fine with taking over small countries up until 2022, and it generally gave him opportunities for new goodies to give away to his friends and also it's exciting and makes him look like a winner
    2. He's been surrounded by yes men for so long that he's lost his ability to really tell what are good strategies, what is happening, or what's likely to happen in the future

    I think the combination means that he's just kind of telling his military to do whatever, including invading Ukraine thinking it would go about the same way as Georgia, Crimea, Chechnya, and the US elections. I do think he benefits from a certain amount of native cunning in this particular brinksmanship with NATO, and of course it doesn't take too much detailed understanding of facts on the ground to just fly some planes around in their airspace and flip people off, but also I think in general this latest chapter of Russia is just a pretty good demonstration of why authoritarianism doesn't make for effective countries.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    A billion in EU buys many times less than the same billion does in russia.

    Think about why it does

    Furthermore, russia has never - at least in the last two-three lifetimes - acted logically

    Governments and rulers do not follow me and you logic, they act for themself and according to their interests

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • A billion in EU buys many times less than the same billion does in russia.

    Think about why it does

    Because no one in their right mind wants rubles, so money comparisons that involve rubles have to be corrected back to reality before the values actually match. If you go by the exchange rate alone, you might as well be comparing dollars to lollipops or something.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    This would entitle russia to shot down all the planes that enter their airspace

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago

    Weird how Putin doesn't seem affected by Trump's aura of respect that would prevent him from daring to attack the West like Donnie claimed he was.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Shoot it down. That cunt putin won't do it again in a hurry.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    What's the aim here?
    Testing the west?
    Numbing NATOs reaction through repetition? - crying wolf repeatedly worked well for Hamas, but it is a bit different here.
    Some domestic politics related demonstration of power like Sapad25?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    He's losing the war and is thus expecting a loss of support for the war. So he needs to extend the war or he's dead. And he cannot just attack another country again.

    What we need to do is exactly the opposite of what he wants us to do. Which I think we are doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    That's it! This time they are not getting away with it. WE'RE CALLING A FUCKING MEETING!

    • NATO
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I guess whoever the person calling the meeting is should just skip the meeting and unilaterally attack Russia?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Are you suggesting they are calling the meeting to organize an attack on Russia? I hope not because that's ridiculous.

    They will be discussing how NATO should respond to provocations from Russia, something they should already know. NATO should have communicated clear red lines and how they will respond to Russia violating them 3 years ago, not start thinking about it today.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    You sound angry they want to have a meeting instead of doing something. What is it you want them to do that doesn’t involve having a meeting?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm not angry, I just think NATO looks more and more pathetic. Russia communicates clear red lines and when those are crossed they retaliate. So for example Russia already said that they will target any NATO troops in Ukraine - BEFORE any NATO troops were officially sent there. NATO on the other hand always waits for Russia to escalate and then starts thinking how to respond. And they usually respond by asking Russia not to do it again. So what NATO should do is to tell Russia how they will respond in advanced and then follow through. This way Russia would think twice before escalating. But because NATO is so weak Russia started sending drones into Poland and weeks later they are sending airplanes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I don't understand. If he can't even take down the Ukraine, how does he expect to take on NATO nations?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Flying a spy plane over the Baltic with transponders off isn’t random; it’s deliberate pressure. These flights let Russia probe NATO’s readiness, time responses, and gather electronic intelligence when allied radars and comms light up. They also normalize risk: forcing constant intercepts drains resources and tests cohesion among allies.

    At home, the Kremlin can showcase defiance; abroad, it signals that even after Sweden joined NATO, Russia will not accept being boxed out of the Baltic. The aim is not a direct clash but erosion of deterrence, unity, and stamina. By staying in the “gray zone,” Moscow keeps initiative, trying to distract support for Ukraine, stress-test NATO, and look for weak links it can exploit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    They also normalize risk: forcing constant intercepts drains resources and tests cohesion among allies.

    it also keeps defensive forces sharp, by giving them practice, and strengthens cohesion by highlighting the shared threat NATO protects its members from.

    the Soviets did this for decades. it's still part of their military doctrine, I guess. though it seems counterproductive to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah all countries do that, but the end game still doesn't make sense to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    There may not be a clear end game, but sometimes just stirring things up is the point. It creates openings and exposes weaknesses, and that in itself can serve as a strategy. He has very little to risk compared to what he might gain, so constant provocation makes sense from his perspective.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Too many weaselly people-pleasers making the decisions so they back off instead of risking a little apocalyptic super-war. Now we get this "I'm not touching you (with guns and missiles (yet))" bullshit that drags on forever instead. Enough foreplay and edging, it's time to fuck.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    I guess it's time to move battleships into the black sea ( which should have been done a long time ago)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    How long is literally everybody going to let Russia get away with these stupid stunts?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    How long until Russia doesn’t have nukes?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'd not be surprise if that was a USA conspiracy to sell weapons to EU

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    A lot of people here encouraging shooting down a plane flying in international airspace. I suspect a lot of you are of the same mindset where it's OK to shoot random boats in the Caribbean and kill everyone on board.

    Don't follow the war hawks ffs.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    I'm fine shooting down hostile fighter jets the second they cross into sovereign airspace, and not a moment sooner.

    the Soviets used to fly fighters close to Western airspace to probe our defenses. we'd intercept, and if they crossed over we'd take them down. this is nothing new.

  • source
  • parent