"I'm not touching you!" is a poor way to run international politics.
post
See, now you've got a problem. If you'd shot down the first one, Russia would have made a big noise and then it would have been fine. Now that you didn't, now it's weird if you start shooting them down.
My advice is to just be straight about it: Publicly announce what the line is where you'll shoot them down, and then stick to it. Even if you just announced a date when the shooting-down will start any time they enter NATO airspace, that might be fine. But you have to stick to it. Right now you're trying to figure out how to make them stop without shooting them down, and that approach just doesn't work. Like you're all surprised they don't establish radio contact. Bro... that is not the game you are engaged in.
(You might also want to confiscate $10 billion in frozen Russian assets to give to Ukraine for each incursion, just to respond to what's already happened... but again without shooting them down it's not going to accomplish anything. The money's already gone honestly, and they know that, they're just waiting for you to figure it out and go through your whole "process" and make it official, and they think you're stupid and weak for every year that goes by that you're not doing that.)
Weird how Putin doesn't seem affected by Trump's aura of respect that would prevent him from daring to attack the West like Donnie claimed he was.
Shoot it down. That cunt putin won't do it again in a hurry.
Turkey didn't hesitate and doesn't have any more problems with Russians violating their airspace.
What's the aim here?
Testing the west?
Numbing NATOs reaction through repetition? - crying wolf repeatedly worked well for Hamas, but it is a bit different here.
Some domestic politics related demonstration of power like Sapad25?
Yes, yes, yes, and also trying to scare European countries into not supporting Ukraine, either out of fear for further angering Russia, or fear that they need their equipment closer to home.
William Spaniel speculates on his YouTube channel that Putin might want to provoke a shoot down to then claim NATO is the agressor. Which he may hope would rally his own people into accepting another conscription wave.
He's losing the war and is thus expecting a loss of support for the war. So he needs to extend the war or he's dead. And he cannot just attack another country again.
What we need to do is exactly the opposite of what he wants us to do. Which I think we are doing.
That's it! This time they are not getting away with it. WE'RE CALLING A FUCKING MEETING!
- NATO
I guess whoever the person calling the meeting is should just skip the meeting and unilaterally attack Russia?
Are you suggesting they are calling the meeting to organize an attack on Russia? I hope not because that's ridiculous.
They will be discussing how NATO should respond to provocations from Russia, something they should already know. NATO should have communicated clear red lines and how they will respond to Russia violating them 3 years ago, not start thinking about it today.
You sound angry they want to have a meeting instead of doing something. What is it you want them to do that doesn’t involve having a meeting?
I'm not angry, I just think NATO looks more and more pathetic. Russia communicates clear red lines and when those are crossed they retaliate. So for example Russia already said that they will target any NATO troops in Ukraine - BEFORE any NATO troops were officially sent there. NATO on the other hand always waits for Russia to escalate and then starts thinking how to respond. And they usually respond by asking Russia not to do it again. So what NATO should do is to tell Russia how they will respond in advanced and then follow through. This way Russia would think twice before escalating. But because NATO is so weak Russia started sending drones into Poland and weeks later they are sending airplanes.
I don't understand. If he can't even take down the Ukraine, how does he expect to take on NATO nations?
Flying a spy plane over the Baltic with transponders off isn’t random; it’s deliberate pressure. These flights let Russia probe NATO’s readiness, time responses, and gather electronic intelligence when allied radars and comms light up. They also normalize risk: forcing constant intercepts drains resources and tests cohesion among allies.
At home, the Kremlin can showcase defiance; abroad, it signals that even after Sweden joined NATO, Russia will not accept being boxed out of the Baltic. The aim is not a direct clash but erosion of deterrence, unity, and stamina. By staying in the “gray zone,” Moscow keeps initiative, trying to distract support for Ukraine, stress-test NATO, and look for weak links it can exploit.
They also normalize risk: forcing constant intercepts drains resources and tests cohesion among allies.
it also keeps defensive forces sharp, by giving them practice, and strengthens cohesion by highlighting the shared threat NATO protects its members from.
the Soviets did this for decades. it's still part of their military doctrine, I guess. though it seems counterproductive to me.
Yeah all countries do that, but the end game still doesn't make sense to me.
There may not be a clear end game, but sometimes just stirring things up is the point. It creates openings and exposes weaknesses, and that in itself can serve as a strategy. He has very little to risk compared to what he might gain, so constant provocation makes sense from his perspective.
Too many weaselly people-pleasers making the decisions so they back off instead of risking a little apocalyptic super-war. Now we get this "I'm not touching you (with guns and missiles (yet))" bullshit that drags on forever instead. Enough foreplay and edging, it's time to fuck.
I guess it's time to move battleships into the black sea ( which should have been done a long time ago)
How long is literally everybody going to let Russia get away with these stupid stunts?
How long until Russia doesn’t have nukes?
I'd not be surprise if that was a USA conspiracy to sell weapons to EU
A lot of people here encouraging shooting down a plane flying in international airspace. I suspect a lot of you are of the same mindset where it's OK to shoot random boats in the Caribbean and kill everyone on board.

Don't follow the war hawks ffs.
I'm fine shooting down hostile fighter jets the second they cross into sovereign airspace, and not a moment sooner.
the Soviets used to fly fighters close to Western airspace to probe our defenses. we'd intercept, and if they crossed over we'd take them down. this is nothing new.
I think there a difference between a civilian plane and a military one.
1 comment