After Iran's latest missile barrage on Monday, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz issued a statement stressing that the residents of Tehran "are going to pay the price soon" the attacks on Israeli cities.

Shortly before the attack on the state television Katz issued another statement saying that "Iran's propaganda mouthpiece is going to be silenced."

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
27 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 33 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    "Zionist regime"

    The difference in reporting is staggering. Really shows how people are conditioned to believe certain things based on the media they consume.

    You'd never hear a Western news organization use the term "Zionist regime."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 1 year ago*

    To be fair, Axios didn't rag on Iran here. They didn't do any kind of labeling, just stating what happened: Israel bombed a live Iranian news station.

    That's what news is supposed to be. The opinion columns are where terms like 'Zionist regime' goes. Same with whatever you'd want to call Iran's govt, but news is just the event as it comes, maybe with context.

    Bombing a live news station, and clarifying that there was no warning, speaks for itself. More context of Israel's many other crimes would be better, but Axios has a very-brief writing style.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago

    Another war crime. We need new Nuremberg trials.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    She didn't sound happy even before the explosion.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago*

    This is not the full video. In the full video, she's reporting on some random stuff when there are some explosions in the background (2-3), so she starts talking like this until the big one hits.

    PS: it's downthread in @industrystandard

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Remember 60 years ago when half the population of Persians could show their ears without inciting the other half to violence?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yes I do. When an oligarchy was destroying Iran and starving its people.

    Amazing how the western discourse around freedom is reduced to some silly fun facts about women.

    Now do Orthodox Jewish women next. Let's see.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Idk man, seems like it's kinda more destroyed now, tbh.

    Also, I don't know about that being a western opinion per se. I chatted with a ~50y old Persian guy some 15 years ago, and he was saying much the same as the guy you replied to.

    That's why he left as I understood it. Well 'twasn' t the only reason, but still.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Well, I thought I’d feel nothing if perhaps a little shock, but seeing her flee for her life as she was self-righteously wagging the finger, something that she probably does often in defense of the Ayatollah, was kinda satisfying. Let’s not forget who these people are who uphold this tyrannical theocracy, TV propagandists included. I do not condone what Israel is doing, but just for one moment this felt good.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Wow, you really should be disgusted with yourself right now. Go take a shower, Jesus Christ.

    You were satisfied seeing someone "flee for her life" because you interpreted her foreign language and hand gestures as "she was self-righteously wagging the finger", and that was enough to make a journalist fleeing for her life because a fascist genocidal state bombed her TV station "felt good".

    🤮🤮🤮

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    There were subtitles for fuck sake 🙄 I didn’t have to interpret anything. Also, Iranian state TV. There is very little that is ambiguous about the video or what the lady in question represents. Also, I seriously doubt she’s a “journalist” as we like to imagine them, doing investigative work, field work, serving the people, and uncovering the truth. Probably just a mouthpiece for the theocracy on state tv.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    You have an amazing skill for rationalizing violence.

    I hope it's your family next.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Calling her journalist is a stretch. She is the token woman mouth piece of the Ayatollah regime. When the Zan zendegi azadi protests were going on, she called for the protestors to be shot.

    She is objectively an evil person who is now sitting in the bed she helped make.

    Israel is bad and this unprovoked attack is a move by Netanyahu and Trump to distract from their domestic problems. But in the giant pile of shit that this situation is, that bitch getting scared is one of the few nuggets of pure karma.

    I hope Khamenei dies too btw. Is that a problem too?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    If it has to be shouted at you, its not news, its propaganda. But she was brave in a tight spot, for sure.

  • source