Colton Berens was looking forward to the added income from his farm, but armed with rightwing falsehoods, other Selby residents opposed the move

all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    You gotta hand it to them. On one hand, burning billions of tons of fossil fuels cannot possibly cause climate change; on the other, a single solar farm in rural South Dakota has the power to just change the atmosphere.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Vote Republican, collect Republicn prizes.

  • source
  • 4 comments in c/leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    “Farming is what we got out here,” Zabel said of why he opposed the project. “A lot of these kids that grew up in these areas, if they don’t have farms to come back to, they don’t come back.”

    He also worried about how solar panels might affect his crops. “We didn’t know if it was gonna bring more rain or deter the rain from getting here, or bring in hail storms,” he said. “You get that size of acreage of glass panels – we were concerned it could just change the atmosphere.”

    Fears that solar will overtake farmland and cause changes to the weather have been grossly exaggerated in misinformation spread by such organizations as No to Solar and Citizens for Responsible Solar, an activist group started by a longtime political operative with ties to high-level conservative politicians and the fossil fuel industry. They have helped disseminate a smorgasbord of unfounded claims, many of which found fertile ground in the anxieties of Walworth’s residents.

    That's more the crux of the article instead of the idea of "owning the libs". It's basically misinformation funded by wealthy interest groups

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (2 children)