19
Goat and PugJesus take on DB0 ADMINS (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/fediverselore@lemmy.ca
228 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 69 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 46 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wow, these guys surely take "side with me fully or you're the enemy" approach for no reason at all. db0 instance has never denied the Uyghur genocide, but people there are painting their moderation as a villain for no reason.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
    • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Copy pasting from a comment below

    @fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com explanation

    FYI goat, i downvoted the post you screenshotted because the person, @isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de, made this disgusting comment and got permabanned on LW + here for it. He’s a horrible person, which is why i downvoted his post. Not because of the content.

    I am not a tankie, not even hexbear/ml users consider me as such; I’ve also seen other stuff about me being a Soviet apologist (?) Which, no, from using the search feature, I have not it seems. Unless they’re including the time I was being nice to cowbee… ? Either way I personally do not have a positive opinion of the USSR but I really don’t want to get into that here.

    I have also had a conversation with cowbee themselves once where I told them I disagree with them with the USSR, China and Ukraine about a week ago, so no, I am not an apologist for the Soviet union.

    https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/21109507

    From @unruffled@anarchist.nexus

    To be clear, if I haven’t been already, I 100% condemn China’s actions towards the Uyghurs. Is it technically a genocide? Depends what definition you’re working with, but to my mind it meets the definition.

    https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/52160152/21075559

    On the other hand the single mod on !meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works seems quite ban happy lately, and resorting to debatable arguments

    My community is also bigger lol

    https://sh.itjust.works/comment/20731327

    And the amount of posts on !meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works by that same single mod is concerning. How many of those do they need make, reusing the same screenshot ad nauseam when Unruffled recognized that China's actions towards the Uyghur meet the definition of a genocide (see comment above)?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [+] -10 points 1 year ago

    "They walked it back after being called out with a half-assed 'Well, I think it meets the definition, but the West is worse so it doesn't matter!' after spreading common fuckwit fascist talking points and denying genocide, whilst simultaneously praising denialism of that same genocide and allowing genocide denial in comms they moderate, clearly they didn't mean it"

    Yes, clearly. /s

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [+] 37 points 1 year ago (36 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 36 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -14 points 1 year ago (36 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 36 child comments
    •
  • [+] 30 points 1 year ago (35 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 35 child comments
    •
  • [+] -14 points 1 year ago (34 children)

    banning pug and goat was our community disassociating itself from someone who doesn’t wish us well and doesn’t want to be a part of us anyway.

    When was I banned?

    I don't wish fascists or their apologists well, nor do I make a habit of participating in their comms. Sorry that you seem to think otherwise.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 34 child comments
    •
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (33 children)

    /0

    fascist

    Considering trying out for the Olympics with that amount of mental gymnastics?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 33 child comments
    •
  • [+] -13 points 1 year ago (32 children)

    Considering trying out for the Olympics with that amount of mental gymnastics?

    I'm sorry, what do you regard Uyghur genocide denial, Holodomor denial, and the support of Vanguard parties overthrowing democracy as?

    Is that what anarchism is to you?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 32 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (31 children)

    First two I simply dont see from /0 staff nor the vast majority of the users you're delusional on both points. On the third neo liberal "democracy" isnt real and is largely a vessel for control by the capitalist oligarchic class, I do not think ML is the solution to that however.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 31 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago* (30 children)

    First two I simply dont see from /0 staff nor the vast majority of the users you’re delusional on both points.

    Furthermore, despite aggressively (and rightly) removing other forms of genocide denial in that comm, both Holodomor and Uyghur Genocide denial are left up in that thread, despite the participation of multiple admins and the reporting of the material.

    In addition to that, both Uyghur genocide denial and Holodomor denial in that same thread are upvoted by the Dbzer0 community.

    How many dbzer0 users would you like me to cite engaging in Uyghur genocide denial or Holodomor denial before you'll concede that it might be a problem? Legitimate question, I know of a significant number, so I may be able to convince you if you're legitimately just skeptical.

    On the third neo liberal “democracy” isnt real and is largely a vessel for control by the capitalist oligarchic class, I do not think ML is the solution to that however.

    Rather than being a reference to modern democratic states, the position is in relevance to the Spartacist Uprising, which proposed, in response to Germany's defeat in WW1 and subsequent incoming elections which the KPD was not barred from running in, and which were largely spearheaded by the then-much-more-left-wing-than-the-modern-day SPD, to attempt a coup explicitly along Bolshevik lines, which had, the previous year, dissolved a democratically elected revolutionary government in Russia.

    DB0 believes that this vanguardist approach is true anarchist praxis, praising ML imitators as 'libertarian socialists'.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 30 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (11 children)

    I dont see how unruffled is denying anything there merely pointing out that starving a entire population to death is on a different level to (still wrong keep in mind) more gradual chipping away of culture. And no frankly I dont need cherry picked "examples", the prevailing attitude on /0 is against denials of those events and taking a anti tankie stance.

    And again neolib "democracy" is a bad joke most parties of Wiemar at that time were milquetoast 'social democrats' right wing nationalists & conservatives or even more milquetoast liberals. And that particular experiment in neolib statecraft ended in the Nazis taking power and killing millions.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    I dont see how unruffled is denying anything there merely pointing out that starving a entire population to death is on a different level to (still wrong keep in mind) more gradual chipping away of culture.

    "More gradual chipping away of culture" being mass sterilization, concentration camps, forced labor, suppression of Uyghur language, the destruction of cultural artifacts, literal settler colonialism, kidnapping children to place with Han families...

    Very gradual, much chipping away, wow.

    You also don't see how claiming that the Uyghur genocide (and putting genocide in quotes, implying that it's not a 'real' genocide, for that fucking matter) is overblown and exaggerated is denying anything?

    And no frankly I dont need cherry picked “examples”, the prevailing attitude on /0 is against denials of those events and taking a anti tankie stance.

    Ah yes, the fact that they're highly upvoted anywhere outside of dbzer0's tankiejerk - including on flippanarchy and leftie memes - is completely irrelevant. None of the examples or evidence matters, only your feelings matter.

    And again neolib “democracy” is a bad joke.

    I'm sorry, did you not read what I wrote?

    What part of the post-WW1 German elections, in a state which had not formed anything more than borders and a proposal for elections, whose electoral design was similar to the contemporary post-revolutionary Russian elections which ushered in a 90% socialist legislature, 'neolib'?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    This is just going around in circles, China isnt causing mass starvation nor flattening nearly every building in Turkistan its still bad what is happening but practically which one can we sooner do something about and what is the most imminent risk to a population outright carpet bombing, shootings and starvation or a shitty tankiestate using authoritarian measures to hack away at a culture quite slowly while at the same time investing in some infrastructure and public services in the region.

    Again I dont see how unruffled was denying that China was doing shit, you're grasping at straws.

    And I simply dont see tankie campist related shit mass upvoted on /0 coms it doesn't happen, maybe you're confusing something that tankies & anarchists can agree on and is somewhat popular in both circles as a tankie concept.

    And no the early Wismar legislature was not 90% socialist, if you're being generous and assume the SPD was genuinely left wing (not really IMO, was still beholden to capital interests) then at most it was about 45% "left" wing.

    Zentrum, DNVP, DDP etc all had a signficiant chunk (conservatives, right wing nationalists & milquetoast liberals).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

    This is just going around in circles, China isnt causing mass starvation nor flattening nearly every building in Turkistan its still bad what is happening but practically which one can we sooner do something about and what is the most imminent risk to a population outright carpet bombing, shootings and starvation or a shitty tankiestate using authoritarian measures to hack away at a culture quite slowly while at the same time investing in some infrastructure and public services in the region.

    Okay? That's no reason to fucking deny or downplay it.

    Again I dont see how unruffled was denying that China was doing shit, you’re grasping at straws.

    My previous comparison:

    “China is being shitty and authoritarian towards the Uyghurs, but it’s nothing like the genocide Israel is waging”, saying that Chinese influence in Myanmar is a more serious violation by the PRC than the Uyghur genocide is, and leveling a judgement of “PTB” - “Power Tripping Bastard” - towards the moderator of [MeanwhileOnGrad] for banning someone who was literally denying the Uyghur genocide.

    Combined, that’s pretty distinctly defending Uyghur genocide denial, and I would say right up on the border of denying Uyghur genocide themselves.

    If I said, “Israel is being shitty and authoritarian towards the Palestinians, but it’s nothing like the genocide the Nazis waged”, would you regard that as:

    A. Borderline genocide denial of the ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people by reducing the ongoing genocide to something that is simply ‘shitty and authoritarian’ while noting that ‘real’ genocide is more than that

    OR

    B. Just making casual comparisons

    And I simply dont see tankie campist related shit mass upvoted on /0 coms it doesn’t happen, maybe you’re confusing something that tankies & anarchists can agree on and is somewhat popular in both circles as a tankie concept.

    Upvoted pro-genocide comments on a single recent Dbzer0 thread:

    Downvoted anti-genocide comments on a recent Dbzer0 thread:

    (note also the upvoted comparison of Uyghur genocide to white genocide conspiracy theories)

    Genocide denial left up:

    Upvoted denial of UN-verified sexual assault:

    I can wade into Flippanarchy and get you plenty of examples from there too, if you like.

    And no the early Wismar legislature was not 90% socialist, if you’re being generous and assume the SPD was genuinely left wing (not really IMO, was still beholden to capital interests) then at most it was about 45% “left” wing.

    I'm referring to the elected Russian government that the Bolsheviks overthrew - the Bolshevik overthrow being what the Spartacist Uprising explicitly sought to imitate.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Again I dont see unruffled denying it nor downplaying it.

    Also nice cherrypicked screenshots lmao, im done you refuse to engage in anythng resambling good faith.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Again I dont see unruffled denying it nor downplaying it.

    So if I said "Claims of Palestinian 'genocide' are mostly overblown and misrepresented by the left", and note 'genocide' in quotes, something which anyone with any decency in their body would recoil from, you, on the other hand, would regard that as neither a denial nor downplaying?

    Also nice cherrypicked screenshots lmao, im done you refuse to engage in anythng resambling good faith.

    They're cherrypicked screenshots because... I demonstrated exactly what you said didn't happen on dbzer0?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Yes they are cherry picked, very rarely does that happen it simply doesn't happen en masse. Note how the tankie had a heap of downvotes along with upvotes & frankly a single comment with two.upvotes is really stretching the "/0 is tankie hurr durr" narrative you've concocted in your head.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Yes they are cherry picked, very rarely does that happen it simply doesn’t happen en masse.

    So how many more examples do you want?

    Oh, what am I saying? No number of examples would be enough.

    Note how the tankie had a heap of downvotes along with upvotes

    Oh, it's fine to have a majority in favor of tankie positions, as long as there are some dissenters along with it. I guess the Holodomor denial with one downvote is okay too.

    & frankly a single comment with two.upvotes is really stretching the “/0 is tankie hurr durr” narrative you’ve concocted in your head.

    I specifically noted that one not as upvoted, but as genocide denial left up by the admins. Sorry that you didn't read what I posted?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Extremely weak examples on a com thats often visited by other instances... this is now coming across as pure seethe from you. They're still getting challenged and often made to look like clowns, and you are 100% cherry picking with the given examples when looking at the entire /0 instances attitudes and views strongly oppose tankie rethoric.

    And im partially skim reading because I have a job and am getting ready to go to it, my apologies I dont have all day to sit around stirring drama and posting on a federated version of reddit.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Extremely weak examples on a com thats often visited by other instances… this is now coming across as pure seethe from you. They’re still getting challenged and often made to look like clowns,

    They're literally not getting challenged, unless one downvote and no responses from dbzer0 users is 'getting challenged and often made to look like clowns'.

    and you are 100% cherry picking with the given examples when looking at the entire /0 instances attitudes and views strongly oppose tankie rethoric.

    So if I go to Flippanarchy and give you the same kind of shite, will you cede the point?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    https://sh.itjust.works/post/45124493 Nope I will not "cede the point" even when goat was trying to start shit via posting about the CCP crackdowns note how the vast majority of /0 agreed with the post.

    Anyways I need to go to work and I've had my fill of your condecending smugness for today.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [+] 8 points 1 year ago (17 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
    •
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago* (16 children)

    The SPDs record is anti-democratic, they used elections to legitimize themselves then unleashed paramilitaries to crush organized workers.

    The elections hadn't happened yet. That's what the Spartacist uprising was trying to prevent - upcoming elections that they were not even barred from running in.

    But tell me more about how the only response to an anti-democratic coup was to roll over and let the People's Fascists(tm) execute everyone and suppress democracy.

    Revolutionary democracy is more than just fucking ballots and voting. The entire point is mass participation, self organization and ongoing struggle.

    Curious that seems to so often be an excuse to disregard the clearly expressed will of the vast majority of the population. It turns out that your "Revolutionary democracy" actually means "A vanguardist clique whose conclusions are always referred to as the will of the people, no matter how many people actually express opposition".

    The January uprising wasn’t a Bolshevik-style coup. It was a mass revolt sparked by SPD repression, which the KPD didn’t even plan

    The KPD literally voted on the subject, lmao. Talk about ignorance - or willingly spreading lies. It's difficult to tell with fascists.

    and which Luxemburg herself thought was premature.

    Yes, Luxemburg herself thought it was a bad idea and voted against it. Luxemburg voted, in fact, to participate in the upcoming elections, which is, according to red fascists like you, bourgeois. Damn that neolib Luxemburg!

    She was outvoted by the KPD leadership, which preferred a coup.

    ‘history major’

    Yes, it is quite apparent that you, like so many other fascists, are 'tired of experts' getting in the way of your masturbatory totalitarian fantasies.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
    •
  • [+] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    The whole “Bolshevik coup” line is just historical revisionism. Even the Prussian government’s own inquiry admitted the January events weren’t plotted by the KPD — it was mass strikes and councils spiraling beyond anyone’s control

    Holy fucking shit, even your apologism is pathetic. Citing Heinrich August Winkler as proof against the KPD's coup, when Winkler was one of the most prominent voices against GDR apologism for the Spartacist Uprising? What, did the councils put a gun to Karl Liebknecht's head and make him and dozens of other KPD leaders vote for escalating the protests into a coup attempt?

    If your idea of “democracy” is ballots in one hand and Freikorps in the other, you’re just proving my point.

    The Freikorps were widely distrusted by the SPD, but like I said - you think that the only response to an attempted fascist coup should have been for the SPD to present themselves for execution. Fascists like you love it when democracy gives up without any attempt to fight back.

    The roman empire guy who hangs out at the nazi bar curated by the nazi goat sending unsolicited asshole pictures is in no position to call anyone a fascist lmao

    "You can't call anyone a fascist, you" [checks notes] "posted in a comm where tankies were criticized"

    Yeah, that about tracks for fascist bootlickers like you. Does the blood of the genocided taste good, or is it the leather that you truly love?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [+] 7 points 1 year ago (13 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    You seem mad, maybe if you re-read the source you would see that I cited one of the top Luxemburg scholars alive today, who was in turn citing the original 1919 inquiry itself.

    You seem illiterate; if you re-read the source you would see it attempts to cite Heinrich August Winkler in support of its position despite his well-known opposition to that kind of KPD apologism. If you were literate, you might also note that nowhere does the report or the article (despite its attempt at apologism) refute the idea that the Spartacist Uprising was an attempted coup along Bolshevik lines approved by and participated in by the KPD. You, on the other hand, say

    The whole “Bolshevik coup” line is just historical revisionism.

    And then attempt to cite a source that says nothing to support you - but it sounded nice and asspatting towards the KPD, so of course your illiterate ass loved it.

    ‘history major’

    Yes, I get it, you despise education. You made it clear the first time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [+] 8 points 1 year ago* (11 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago* (10 children)

    The accusation you made was it was a centrally plotted KPD bolshevik coup, when the evidence from the time shows that it was not.

    Sweetie, your illiteracy is showing again. This is the accusation I made, and I quote:

    The elections hadn’t happened yet. That’s what the Spartacist uprising was trying to prevent - upcoming elections that they were not even barred from running in.

    But tell me more about how the only response to an anti-democratic coup was to roll over and let the People’s Fascists™ execute everyone and suppress democracy.

    The KPD literally voted on the subject, lmao. Talk about ignorance - or willingly spreading lies. It’s difficult to tell with fascists.

    Yes, Luxemburg herself thought it was a bad idea and voted against it. Luxemburg voted, in fact, to participate in the upcoming elections, which is, according to red fascists like you, bourgeois. Damn that neolib Luxemburg!

    She was outvoted by the KPD leadership, which preferred a coup.

    Sorry that you're incapable of parsing any sentence that isn't asspatting fascism. I understand it's a serious condition.

    You’ve got it wrong, I despise the way you behave while acting like you’re educated. Should have been clear the first time.

    The way I behave being... calling you out on spreading disinformation in service to fascist ideals?

    Wow, what a terrible way for an educated person to act. I see why a fascist bootlicker like you hates it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [+] 7 points 1 year ago (8 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Sweetie, your illiteracy is showing again. This is the accusation I made, and I quote:

    I just love the extra sprinkling of sexism on display here. Never once in our dozens of comments has PJ called me "sweetie"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    I just love the extra sprinkling of sexism on display here. Never once in our dozens of comments has PJ called me “sweetie”

    Lmao. Sorry that you can't comprehend calling someone sweetie unless they're female? My post history is full of it. Go ahead, use the search function - ah, what am I saying? Facts are inconvenient little things, I know you despise them.

    Sorry, sweetie, that I didn't regard you lowly enough to condescend to until you started engaging in genocide denial and simping for fascism. :)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You used it this way, once, 9 months ago, against a person whose gender I didn't bother to investigate.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You used it this way, once, 9 months ago, against a person whose gender I didn’t bother to investigate.

    Sorry, I know that's higher than you can count and more words than you can read.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago

    does goat send you asshole DMs too?

    That's the kind of response I would expect from someone who's incapable of reading what I wrote.

    But no, I've been lucky enough to be spared that, though Goat doing so caused me to unsubscribe from MOG.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Sweetie

    Ew.

    Dude. Just fucking stop. This is going way beyond into pretty disgusting territory.

    Edited to add: Your "response" is noted. Not into the casual sexism, and I find it extremely odd that you had no idea about goat. Just going to go ahead and save myself the headache now and block.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 16 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    The fact this thread has three times as many comments as total votes goes to show how well the fediverse knows the lengths to which these users will go find new targets to justify harassment.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    And then say we're the assholes for defending ourselves from the slander and insults.

    Look what you made me do! This is your fault! I wouldn't have had to do this if you just went along with this!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    This started with me defending myself from slander and insults and proving that your instance brigades, harass and now even post fake nude images. Your instance is even federated with Hexbear. How do you defend that?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    proving that your instance brigades

    I’ve never heard anyone accuse dbzer0 of brigading before, and I’m often unsure what someone considers brigading to be.

    post fake nude images

    I don’t understand. Are fake nude images of fake people worse than real nude images of real people?

    Your instance is even federated with Hexbear. How do you defend that?

    I’m sure that sounded relevant in your head, where federating with Hexbear is self-evidently a sin. If they owe you a defense, what’s the accusation?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    They regularly target specific comments and threads that are linked from their snark community. Here are some recent examples of how they manipulate threads that are linked by their community.

    I don’t understand. Are fake nude images of fake people worse than real nude images of real people?

    I'm not fake

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [+] -9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    And then say we’re the assholes for defending ourselves from the slander and insults.

    Top tier projection from my favorite fan, as always.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    If you really don't want drama then learn what you're doing that tends to bring it on and do less of that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • [+] 20 points 1 year ago* (8 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

    I got banned from voat, twice, because I was questioning nazis on their views. I like to question extremists and make it clear that their positions are illogical and nonsensical, only fuelled by hatred and insecurity. I also take credit for helping shut down ruqqus, which was filled with alt-righters. I also helped shut down /r/uncensorednews, which was the largest neo-nazi subreddit. But sure, I'm a nazi because I dare challenge them, that makes sense.

    I challenge extremists of all varieties. I challenge tankies, jihadists, Christian fundamentalists, sovereign citizens, QAnons, anti-vaxxers, antisemites, libertarians and trump supporters. Does that make me all of those things? No, obviously not.

    ExplodingHeads didn't start openly fascist. They first presented themselves as conservative, as extremists usually do. At the time Lemmy was brand new, and my argument was that the fediverse needs variety and diversity of opinions to stay alive. Unfortunately, EH was co-opted by neo-nazis, or they were neo-nazis all along, but if anyone from back then recalls, I also regularly challenged them on their Trump-supporter positions. But it's easier to ignore all that history and context.

    I joined because it had an icon of a burger, but I left after I realised what it was. Moved on to aussie.zone and later to SJW.

    I was, I was brought on by tejmar, the head mod who wanted WPD to be a more serious subreddit, not filled with sick jokes of making fun of dead people and because I was good at identifying extremists early and catching onto their many dogwhistles. We both wanted WPD to be a more educational community like /r/medizzy, focusing on a more philosophical and medical take on the subreddit's content. After the Christchurch shooting, I left because it was my opinion that the shooting shouldn't be posted due to the shooter being a neo-nazi and also because it's sickening footage that will get the sub in hot water. My protests went unheard, I was removed, and predictably, it was banned.

    I don't even have meat... Also don't know what you mean by sheriff star?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

    When the nazi bar kicked you out, you put on a fake mustache and glasses in order to get back in. Got it.

    After two years. I was curious, and you didn't need to make an account to access their chatroom. Made it easy to troll that one single guy.

    Well, I mean, if you surround yourself with nazis and go to bat for them…

    They banned me lol, I wasn't supporting them in the slightest.

    Yeah yeah, you go soft on nazis and shit on leftists. I know that already.

    I shit on everyone. No one on the fediverse even knows my political position.

    Yeah, you didn’t join because it was a freeze peach zone which you only quit because they didn’t allow your kink. If I wasn’t that lazy I’d go take a look on the wayback machine, I’m sure it’s all saved there somewhere.

    wat. that doesn't make sense. Burgit was the instance that was allowing loli shit, which I didn't realise because NSFW is opt-in on Lemmy. As soon as I found out, I left immediately and good riddance. But if you wanna look at loli shit on the wayback machine, go ahead, kinda fuckin weird

    Little you was just lending a hand making things respectable huh?

    Yes. I criticised Tejmar and the moderator team there for allowing disgusting comments making fun of dead people. So they brought me on to make a change to that, and then they booted me when I told them not to post the Christchurch shooting. Also technically, goat is my alt since I owned slugcat first, and have been pretty open about slugcat being my original account. Thank you for listing the thread though, I'm eager to hear some input on that community concept. I'm in the medical field, so death and gore are pretty common in my usual life.

    I’d be confused too if a fucking amazonian rainforest had prevented me from seeing my brownie box all my life. Shave that ass dude…

    I've since found the post you're referring to, and that's hella fake. It's since been removed across db0 and lemmy.world because it's against Lemmy's code of conduct and also it's fake. Also I'm not even a dude

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I have already explained to you that I wasn't aware the instance had that sort of content because NSFW is an opt-in feature. Once I realised I immediately left.

    You ain’t? Could have sworn you mentioned being a gay guy somewhere.

    i dont think so. even then, does that make a difference?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
    • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    .... you all do know that goat specifically says they just like riling people up, right?

    And you're just gobbling down the nonsense and getting riled up?

    With claims of things that go directly against the rules of the instance?

    This is some weird ass shit stirring going on. Enjoy your manufactured drama folks.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    • load more comments (-1 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›