all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Does anyone remember specifically why he wasn't protected by whistleblower laws?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Sounds like they wanted to try and make an example of him for leaking information outside of the ATO. Pretty brutal response, they do really need to strengthen whistle blower protections more.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I think it's because he took/leaked confidential documents belonging to the ATO. This isn't covered by the public information disclosure laws. You do not need to collect evidence, that's up to the investigators, you are encouraged to provide your own records eg notes, journals.

  • source
  • parent