top 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 11 points 1 year ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Thanks for the information. It confirms my impression that my dream is impossible.

    I wanted to build my own house myself, which is a massive challenge. But the idea that it will be made twice as difficult because of other people, not the challenge itself, made me give it up. I wouldn't have the emotional stability to tolerate that.

    I'm not a fucking corporation wanting to profit from other people's work. I just want a place to live! I fully support all possible regulations and fees scaling with the intended profit and people hired, but how come someone wanting to get a place to live have to put up with the same as someone wanting profit? Or worse, usually even more, since parasites have many ways of avoiding tax and other things...

    And the price of land is a consequence of the same issue: that the market is made for "investors", vampires, undead and other horrors.

    The rest, septic tanks, solar system, etc, they are just natural parts of the challenge. Nothing to complain on that, quite the opposite; how easy it is now to generate your own energy with solar is a great show of progress. There will be costs with that, or with linking to the structure someone else paid and provided.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I wish these kinds of services could target specific at risk groups, not a gender.

    I would be happy if it was focused on homeless parents with young children, or homeless victims of family violence. With those things they might still end up getting only women, but at least they'd be selected based on their situation instead of bigotry.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Maybe bigotry is the wrong word in this case, but maybe not. Either way it's still discriminating based on an unchangeable characteristic of those people. I'd be equally annoyed if they targeted men or a specific race or an eye colour. I just think that when you try to help people, you should try to discriminate on circumstance, not things like race or gender. And we should be calling it out so people can do better in the future.

    I do know there is a lot of correlation between gender and circumstance, but I think it's either lazy to use gender as a proxy or they really are bigoted.

    On the other hand I would still like to give them props for helping people in a significant way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago

    They have "discriminated on circumstance". Due to structural factors like losing superannuation and workplace advancement due to biology, women are disadvantaged as a group to start with. When it comes to housing, especially after a relationship breaks down, women are the ones who generally have much less resources to start over. This is a structural and societal problem, so if you want "equality" learn about the backpack of privilege and start acknowledging structural biases that discriminate against women.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)