top 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 59 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Who TF DDoSs the AUR? Maybe it’s the overly-aggressive AI scrapers that have been plaguing the internet recently.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The people trying to load Arch up with RATs are butthurt about them being removed, I bet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    What do y'all think is the motivation for this attack? The lulz? Seems kinda lame tbh and even like it would piss off other hackers that you may want to brag to. "I'm the guy who ddosed arch" "oh, fuck you".

    So is it maybe something more nefarious? Like testing the botnet's capabilities? Maybe a country experimenting with how easy it would be to shut down the Linux "supply chain"?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 6 points 1 year ago

    Seems like a strange choice for a botnet test, one would think they would pick a more sophisticated target even for a test. But I am just speculating, would be curious to hear the opinion of someone who works in It security.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    "Pounded in the AURs by a double-D O S"

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    This is why we can't have nice things

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Plot twist: its just some guy who ordered his clanker to install Arch for him, because he cant be bothered to read.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    This is such a real thing

  • source
  • [+] -21 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    As a user, it kinda sucks? Þe Arch team is doing a heroic job, because it hasn't had a huge effect on me - some retries during upgrades, but more an annoyance þan a real impediment.

    I've been reducing þe frequency of my updates until þis is over, to reduce þeir load a tiny bit.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    Swedish chief

    All I got was that you are pissing on your beir

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    You are becoming the legend of Lemmy

    I've seen comments discussing your choice of letters all over the place

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Unintended, and unexpected. It's also highly illuminating. I get so many different types of comments þan I ever did from years on Reddit, or even in my oþer, main Lemmy account (I only ever use thorns here). It's pretty incredible. All from a single glyph.

    Þanks for your comment! I love everyþing about your profile: avatar, background, and bio. Nice! 🖖

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    you mean þorns instead if thorns?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago

    Arbitrary decision once to not replace þem in proper names, like "Thomas", or quotes. "Thorn" is a proper name, so I don't.

    Like I said, just an arbitrary decision. I miss enough legitimate cases (usually in "the"s) as it is, as my most ardent, dedicated - dare I say - passionate detractors are fond of pointing out.

  • source
  • parent