all 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 72 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Thank God we’ve got the government here to protect us.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Can't let the children have access to an Encyclopedia. Too dangerous. We have ChatGPT to give them all the information they need.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

    They might look up adult content like "balls" or "boobs"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (8 children)

    I remember doing that with a regular dictionary in middle school english class

    edit: Yes I was scarred for life. Wish the government had intervened.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    heck I can still remember the way to the shelf in my local library that contained a nat geo book on various tribes that, of course, contained boobs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I can’t believe they let you see pictures of other naked humans as a small human!! What a failure of federal government

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    They should just block UK traffic like the porn sites do. This is an excellent way to lose a resource the government regularly uses.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Bold of you to assume the govt won’t just use the same VPNs they’ll ban the proles from having.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    To download Wikipedia to your computer for offline use, see here: https://kiwix.org/en/

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago*

    Guess who becomes much easier to brainwash and control when the kids of this generation don't have access to unfederated information and educational outlets?

    The adults of next generation!

    Fuck this new world order.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    They're gonna lose next election harder than Tories and I'm not even going to feel sorry for them.

    It'll fuck me and my family over big time. More than Brexit did. I was always powerless to change anything here, they'll vote reform and they'll go even harder on this shit. Thatcher 2.0 incoming.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    You're blaming the current government for a law that was brought in by the previous government.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I'm sorry, which government told us they're not going to discuss this even after the very system designed to bring things up to their attention passed the threshold?

    You don't get to hide behind "it was done before we got here" when you're actively pushing for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    I sure wish Wikipedia would just grow a pair and outright block UK IP addresses.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Is it just me or is this Labour government more far right than the previous Tory one?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This is actually a Tory policy, where the law was passed by the previous Tory government and came into force under labour.

    That's not a get out of jail card, because they could have stopped it, and instead choose to continue it, just like they continued the NHS anti trans policies. Or the way they choose to continue the same austerity budget rules.

    At this point, I'd say they're exactly as right wing as the Tories.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Labour have always had a bad track record of civil liberties. Although as the other reply notes this was a Tory policy initially, I've not gone over the proposed amendments to see if they'd have implemented it slightly differently (I suspect not). Unfortunately policies like these are both popular and free for the govt to implement so it's literally a no-brainer for MPs to vote through without thinking about consequences.

  • source
  • parent
  • 11 comments in c/technology@beehaw.org view that post
    [–] 53 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    It seems it hasn't been classified yet, luckily, however, the uk is really turning to shit. V for vendetta is becoming a reality.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    "Meanwhile, in the former United States ..."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If Wikipedia is required to do verification and doesn't have the funds for it, they could just IP block the UK. Maybe it'd get people to give a shit too if Wikipedia noped out of the entire country as a result.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    wow. no wikipedia for britain aye.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment