Probably dies before you even get it half full
post
That's a pretty good price. I don't know how much I trust Seagate to get a drive that big though.
Is that a good idea? I mean having all of that storage on one component? Wouldn't it be safer to split that data onto separate drives?
Probably a good candidate for drive shucking. Can get a good, potentially enterprise grade, hard drive for cheaper than the drive alone would cost. Then stick it into a NAS.
Actually, large drives like this make perfect sense in RAID arrays. Just make sure your using at least RAID 6 with drives this big - the rebuild times are scary long. I run a mix of 18TB drives in my home server and the key is having a solid backup strategy, not avoiding large drives. No matter the brand, always assume any drive will fail.
Too bad it's Seagate.
If it means anything, I have been using Seagate Ironwolf HD's in my NAS for years now after having to switch to them when HGST went under, and I have yet to have any issues with one yet. I think I have 5 right now.
The data hoarder in me says yes. The realist says I'm only using 4TB out of 14 right now.
I would wait. There have been recent developments about heating the HD surface with a laser to increase storage capacity. I think it's wise to see how this develops and wether it causes problems.

top 21 comments